From: Genetic variation in Pinus taeda wood properties predicted using non-destructive techniques
Ā | \( h_i^2 \) | SE | \( h_{{HS}}^2 \) | SE | \( h_{{FS}}^2 \) | SE | \( * H_{{FS}}^2 \) | SE | CV% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Traits | GA diallel | ||||||||
Acoustic velocity | 0.76 | (0.25) | 0.81 | (0.07) | 0.83 | (0.09) | ā | ā | 13 |
D. stiffness | 0.86 | (0.23) | 0.88 | (0.03) | 0.94 | (0.04) | ā | ā | 23 |
NIR density | 0.66 | (0.23) | 0.87 | (0.02) | 0.75 | (0.10) | ā | ā | 7 |
NIR coarseness | 0.56 | (0.22) | 0.89 | (0.02) | 0.68 | (0.12) | ā | ā | 5 |
NIR MFA | 0.30 | (0.26) | 0.68 | (0.25) | 0.45 | (0.33) | 0.82 | (0.12) | 10 |
NIR MOE | 0.27 | (0.26) | 0.64 | (0.29) | 0.40 | (0.33) | 0.81 | (0.13) | 13 |
NIR cell wall | 0.41 | (0.23) | 0.76 | (0.17) | 0.72 | (0.24) | 0.75 | (0.17) | 7 |
Ā | NC diallel | ||||||||
Acoustic velocity | 0.38 | (0.16) | 0.87 | (0.03) | 0.74 | (0.12) | 0.75 | (0.11) | 10 |
D. stiffness | 0.42 | (0.16) | 0.88 | (0.02) | 0.82 | (0.07) | ā | ā | 18 |
NIR density | 0.92 | (0.24) | 0.89 | (0.01) | 0.84 | (0.07) | ā | ā | 9 |
NIR coarseness | 0.50 | (0.21) | 0.85 | (0.04) | 0.66 | (0.12) | ā | ā | 7 |
NIR MFA | 0.19 | (0.13) | 0.72 | (0.11) | 0.38 | (0.18) | ā | ā | 11 |
NIR MOE | 0.42 | (0.19) | 0.83 | (0.05) | 0.61 | (0.14) | ā | ā | 18 |
NIR cell wall | 0.78 | (0.24) | 0.88 | (0.02) | 0.79 | (0.08) | ā | ā | 9 |
Ā | SC diallel | ||||||||
Acoustic velocity | 0.30 | (0.13) | 0.85 | (0.04) | 0.69 | (0.14) | 0.73 | (0.12) | 10 |
D. stiffness | 0.30 | (0.13) | 0.79 | (0.06) | 0.51 | (0.13) | ā | ā | 18 |
NIR density | 0.50 | (0.21) | 0.88 | (0.10) | 0.84 | (0.12) | ā | ā | 7 |
NIR coarseness | 0.14 | (0.19) | 0.45 | (0.44) | 0.39 | (0.40) | ā | ā | 4 |
NIR MFA | 0.28 | (0.17) | 0.82 | (0.18) | 0.71 | (0.20) | ā | ā | 11 |
NIR MOE | 0.25 | (0.18) | 0.69 | (0.25) | 0.61 | (0.26) | ā | ā | 12 |
NIR cell wall | 0.20 | (0.20) | 0.57 | (0.34) | 0.50 | (0.33) | ā | ā | 6 |