Skip to main content

Table 2 Parameter estimates and goodness of fits for linear models of self-thinning relationships

From: Significant differences and curvilinearity in the self-thinning relationships of 11 temperate tree species assessed from forest inventory data

 

Intercept (trees/ha)

lnD g (cm)

σ 2 (trees/ha)

logLik

γ

LRT1

μ (trees/ha)

LRT2

Pubescent oak

12.270

−1.809

2.190

−316.683

0.971

***

−2.917

*

0.283

0.094

1.285

0.017

2.470

Pedunculate oak

12.138

−1.758

1.731

−820.640

0.965

***

−2.585

***

0.161

0.049

0.401

0.009

0.865

Sessile oak

12.681

−1.911

1.238

−562.624

0.961

***

−2.181

***

0.181

0.058

0.198

0.009

0.503

Common beech

12.950

−1.941

1.321

−1451.857

0.946

***

−2.236

***

0.110

0.034

0.143

0.008

0.356

Scots pine

11.993

−1.615

1.338

−3,137.467

0.933

***

−1.324

***

0.125

0.039

0.322

0.013

0.689

Aleppo pine

12.512

−1.881

0.612

−562.740

0.861

***

0.200

ns

0.277

0.081

0.166

0.036

0.407

Corsican pine

12.104

−1.653

1.166

−204.123

0.936

***

−2.089

ns

0.211

0.065

0.477

0.025

1.357

Maritime pine

11.982

−1.711

0.854

−2,669.932

0.903

***

−1.757

***

0.079

0.024

0.058

0.010

0.193

Norway spruce

13.086

−1.878

1.222

−639.428

0.962

***

−2.168

***

0.108

0.033

0.219

0.004

0.564

Silver fir

12.621

−1.779

0.853

−658.444

0.006

***

−1.797

***

0.108

0.032

0.083

0.007

0.273

Douglas fir

12.133

−1.646

1.128

−511.402

0.941

***

−2.061

***

0.189

0.057

0.141

0.012

0.371

  1. Standard errors are in italics. LRT1 corresponds to the likelihood ratio test between the model fitted by OLS and the stochastic frontier model fitted by maximum likelihood (significance of a left-tailed distribution for the residuals). LRT2 corresponds to the likelihood ratio test of μ (existence of a mode in the left-tailed distribution of residuals)
  2. ns non-significant
  3. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05