Table 6 Growth models of silver fir on Mont-Ventoux, France, following comparisons of growth between infected (N = 14) and uninfected trees (N = 6) using Student’s t test (p < 0.05)

TC4_S7

0

–

0.480

4.70

0.00147

**

3.15

19.9

0.00498

*

839

650

TC12_S6

0

–

0.429

5.00

0.00158

**

1.88

19.9

NS

NS

740

526

TC13_S12

0

–

0.332

3.27

0.0131

*

−1.42

16.7

NS

NS

231

251

TC15_S13

0

–

0.451

7.57

<0.001

***

2.04

12.5

NS

NS

693

457

TCR14

0

–

0.594

4.89

0.00346

**

2.50

13.2

0.0262

*

556

403

TCR49

0

–

0.952

62.2

<0.001

***

3.19

10.2

0.00931

**

2,600

412

TCR58

1

1997

0.235

4.27

0.0129

*

−0.28

14.4

NS

NS

735

765

TC8_S3

1

1997

0.0900

2.61

NS

NS

–

–

–

–

–

–

TC3_S17

1

1999

0.375

7.40

0.000793

**

−1.39

18.8

NS

NS

677

778

TC1_S7

1

2001

0.859

25.4

<0.001

***

3.41

18.6

0.00299

**

814

710

TC7_S8

1

2001

0.402

3.15

0.0118

*

6.72

19.8

<0.001

***

816

205

TCR16

1

2002

0.376

5.83

0.00153

**

−4.71

11.2

0.000600

**

1,426

2,504

TCR45

1

2004

0.583

9.95

<0.001

***

−2.94

12.9

0.0114

*

515

727

TCR38

2

1997

0.579

7.31

<0.001

***

−5.81

19.9

<0.001

***

2,262

3,284

TCR5

2

1997

0.868

31.0

<0.001

***

−4.42

10.7

0.00110

**

1,774

3,844

TC3_S10

2

2001

0.539

5.16

0.000702

**

1.11

19.7

NS

NS

846

740

TC4_S11

2

2001

0.407

8.32

<0.001

***

3.11

17.8

0.00613

*

995

805

TC15_S1

3

1992

0.367

5.63

0.00186

**

3.80

16.5

0.00148

**

2,048

1,363

TCR13

3

1996

0.331

4.97

0.00373

**

−0.813

11.8

NS

NS

1,560

1,774

TCR6

3

2000

0.822

19.5

<0.001

***

−0.770

16.5

NS

NS

979

1,037