Skip to main content

Table 5 PBRAVO model—validation statistics for the output stand variables simulated using as input data the first year of measurements in sample plots of 1,000 m2

From: A tree distance-dependent growth and yield model for naturally regenerated pure uneven-aged maritime pine stands in central inland of Portugal

 

Year t 1 (n = 32)

Year t 2 (n = 30)

Year t 3 (n = 28)

Variable

\( \overline{e} \)

\( a\overline{e} \)

\( {\sigma^2}p \)

\( {R^2}p \)

\( \overline{e} \)

\( a\overline{e} \)

\( {\sigma^2}p \)

\( {R^2}p \)

\( \overline{e} \)

\( a\overline{e} \)

\( {\sigma^2}p \)

\( {R^2}p \)

N

 

30.560

45.667

9,436.02

0.8283

47.229

64.043

11,689.69

0.809

G

−0.114

0.175

0.0489

0.999

1.961

2.109

12.384

0.8468

2.095

2.225

14.744

0.788

dg

−0.023

0.842

0.0348

0.998

0.374

0.751

0.806

0.9478

−0.010

0.973

2.201

0.829

\( \bar{h} \)

−0.021

0.933

1.2238

0.822

0.121

1.226

2.085

0.6889

−0.045

1.237

2.423

0.552

h dom

 

−0.058

0.442

0.388

0.946

−0.037

0.713

0.886

0.866

V

24.926

24.926

197.148

0.962

38.207

38.207

892.248

0.866

38.702

38.702

938.467

0.830

  1. \( \overline{e} \) model bias evaluated with the mean prediction errors, \( a\overline{e} \) model precision with the mean of the absolute value of the prediction errors, σ 2 p prediction error variance, R 2 p modelling efficiency computed with the prediction errors, N number of trees per hectare, G basal area per hectare, dg quadratic mean diameter at breast height, \( \bar{h} \) average height, h dom dominant height, V total volume per hectare