Skip to main content

Table 1 Values of visual contrast weights between land cover classes

From: Visual complexity and the montado do matter: landscape pattern preferences of user groups in Alentejo, Portugal

LCC

C

IC

RF

IP

NP

SA

MS

VN

OR

IO

OG

MT

EC

PN

MF

SF

C

0

               

IC

1

0

              

RF

1

1

0

             

IP

1

1

1

0

            

NP

1

1

1

1

0

           

SA

2

2

2

2

1

0

          

MS

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

         

VN

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

        

OR

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

0

       

IO

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

0

      

OG

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

0

     

MT

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

0

    

EC

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

0

   

PN

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

0

  

MF

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

0

 

SF

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

0

  1. LCC land cover classes, C cereal, IC irrigated culture, RF rice field, IP irrigated pasture, NP natural pasture, SA shrubs in agricultural area, MS heterogeneous agricultural land, VN vineyard, OR orchard, IO intensive olive grove, OG olive grove, MT montado, EC eucalyptus, PN pinus, MF mixed forest, SF scrubs in forest land
Back to article page

Annals of Forest Science

ISSN: 1297-966X