Skip to main content

Table. 2 The effects of site type (Aā€“E; see text and legend of Fig.Ā 1) and the likelihood of cold winter on the probability of pine sawfly damage. Parameter estimates (and standard deviation), with the p values of the tests of significance of the term, of the linear predictor of the GLM (see Eq. 1 in the ā€œData analysisā€ section) fitted on different data sets

From: Vulnerability to pine sawfly damage decreases with site fertility but the opposite is true with Scleroderris canker damage; results from Finnish ICP Forests and NFI data

Ā 

ICP Forests Level 1

NFI 8 and NFI 9

NFI 10

Intercept (Ī±, effect of B)

āˆ’3.34 (0.16)

āˆ’6.88 (0.16)

āˆ’4.48 (0.16)

Difference of A to B (Ī²A)

āˆ’1.17 (0.40) pā€‰=ā€‰0.003

āˆ’13.2 (185.7) pā€‰=ā€‰0.94

āˆ’1.06 (0.59) pā€‰=ā€‰0.076

Difference of C to B (Ī²C)

0.43 (0.17) pā€‰=ā€‰0.012

1.28 (0.14) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

0.89 (0.17) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

Difference of D to B (Ī²D)

āˆ’1.37 (1.01) pā€‰=ā€‰0.176

āˆ’0.39 (0.33) pā€‰=ā€‰0.234

āˆ’0.64 (0.59) pā€‰=ā€‰0.279

Difference of E to B (Ī²E)

0.91 (0.29) pā€‰=ā€‰0.002

1.19 (0.15) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

0.45 (0.21) pā€‰=ā€‰0.030

Effect of the likelihood of cold winter (Ī³)

āˆ’3.75 (0.68) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

3.80 (0.28) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

āˆ’5.31 (0.68) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001