Skip to main content

Table 3 The effects of site types (A-E; see text and legend of Fig.Ā 1) and rainfall during Mayā€“September on Gremmeniella abietina damage. Parameter estimates (and standard deviation), with the p values of the tests of significance of the term, of the linear predictor of the GLM (see Eq. 1 in the ā€œData analysisā€ section) fitted on different data sets

From: Vulnerability to pine sawfly damage decreases with site fertility but the opposite is true with Scleroderris canker damage; results from Finnish ICP Forests and NFI data

Ā 

ICP Forests Level 1

NFI 8 and NFI 9

NFI 10

Intercept (Ī±, effect of B)

āˆ’3.90 (0.49)

āˆ’6.61 (0.23)

āˆ’3.33 (0.48)

Difference of A to B (Ī²A)

0.64 (0.09) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

0.50 (0.07) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

āˆ’0.26 (0.25) pā€‰=ā€‰0.296

Difference of C to B (Ī²C)

āˆ’0.36 (0.08) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

āˆ’0.43 (0.05) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

0.21 (0.10) pā€‰<ā€‰0.044

Difference of D to B (Ī²D)

0.28 (0.20) pā€‰=ā€‰0.156

0.75 (0.06) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

0.78 (0.17) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

Difference of E to B (Ī²E)

āˆ’1.33 (0.28) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

0.58 (0.04) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

1.33 (0.09) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

Effect of rainfall (Ī³)

0.006 (0.002) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

0.01 (<0.001) pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

āˆ’0.003 (0.002) pā€‰=ā€‰0.120