Skip to main content

Table 2 Ranking frequencies in seven tested images (N = 423) and average rankings

From: Consumers’ perceptions and preference profiles for wood surfaces tested with pairwise comparison in Germany

 

Image 1

Image 3

Image 4

Image 6

Image 8

Image 10

Image 12

Rank 1

N (%)

157 (37.1)

11 (2.6)

50 (11.8)

57 (13.5)

88 (20.8)

31 (7.3)

29 (6.9)

Rank 2

N (%)

48 (11.3)

75 (17.7)

53 (12.5)

92 (21.7)

53 (12.5)

49 (11.6)

53 (12.5)

Rank 3

N (%)

28 (6.6)

90 (21.3)

68 (16.1)

89 (21)

27 (6.4)

39 (9.2)

82 (19.4)

Rank 4

N (%)

30 (7.1)

72 (17)

79 (18.7)

57 (13.5)

41 (9.7)

52 (12.3)

92 (21.7)

Rank 5

N (%)

31 (7.3)

66 (15.6)

66 (15.6)

61 (14.4)

38 (9)

63 (14.9)

98 (23.2)

Rank 6

N (%)

34 (8.0)

85 (20.1)

63 (14.9)

48 (11.3)

56 (13.2)

94 (22.2)

43 (10.2)

Rank 7

N (%)

95 (22.5)

24 (5.7)

44 (10.4)

19 (4.5)

120 (28.4)

95 (22.5)

26 (6.1)

Mean ranking

3.50

4.08

4.00

3.46

4.27

4.72

3.97

  1. Figures highlighted in italics illustrate local maxima in bimodal distributions