Skip to main content

Table 1 Ranges of the ‘adequate to optimal’ (A/O) nutritional class for tree foliar concentrations (mg g−1) of nitrogen (N), potassium (K) and magnesium (Mg) as compiled by Stefan et al. (1997), ratios of N/Mg and N/K according to Mellert and Göttlein (2012); species-specific critical limits of the molar ratio of base cations to total aluminium (Bc/Al) and of the inorganic N concentration in the mineral top soil solution (Nmin, mg L−1) regarding nutrient imbalances, and the critical limit for the mineral N concentration in the soil solution below the rooting zone (Nmin) regarding nitrogen saturation

From: Exceedance of critical loads and of critical limits impacts tree nutrition across Europe

Species groupa

Foliage

Soil solution

mineral topsoil

deepest lysimeters

N a

K a

Mg a

N/Mgb

N/Kb

Bc/Al c

Nmin d

Nmin d

Spruce

12–17

3.5–9

0.6–1.5

10.7–21

1.7–3.3

1.2

0.2

1

Pine

12–17

3.5–10

0.6–1.5

10.8–22.9

2–4

1.2

0.2

1

Silver fir

12–17

3.5–9

0.6–1.5

10.7–22.9*

1.7–4*

1.2

0.2

1

Douglas fir

12–17

3.5–10

0.6–1.5

10.7–22.9*

1.7–4*

0.3

0.2

1

Other conifers

12–17

3.5–10

0.6–1.5

10.7–22.9*

1.7–4*

1.2

0.2

1

Beech

18–25

5–10

1–1.5

8.2–21.8

1.9–3.8

0.6

0.4

1

Birch

18–25

5–10

1–1.5

8.1–21.8*

1.7–3.8*

0.8

0.4

1

Oak

15–25

5–10

1–2.5

8.1–21.8

1.7–3.7

0.6

0.4

1

Other broadleaves

15–25

5–10

1–2.5

8.1–21.8*

1.7–3.8*

0.6

0.4

1

  1. aForest Foliar Coordinating Centre of the Expert Panel on Foliage and Litterfall of ICP Forests (Stefan et al. 1997)
  2. bMellert and Göttlein (2012)
  3. cSverdrup and Warfvinge (1993) and Lorenz et al. (2008)
  4. dIost et al. (2012)
  5. *Adapted