Skip to main content

Table 4 ANOVA results (F statistic value and probability levels) and test of marginal mean comparison of the effect of site type and management alternative under the baseline climate scenario on equivalent annual income from timber and cone production (EAI), carbon storage (CS), average annual increment in total volume (MAI), saw log harvests (MHsaw), and annual average cone production over the rotation period (CPha and CPtree) (n = 18)

From: A model-based analysis of climate change vulnerability of Pinus pinea stands under multiobjective management in the Northern Plateau of Spain

  

EAI (€)

CS (kg ha−1 year−1)

MAI (m3 ha−1 year−1)

MHsaw (m3 ha−1 year−1)

CPha (kg ha−1 year−1)

CPtree (kg tree−1 year−1)

 

Site type (S)

1181.9***

140.9***

146.9***

18.9***

76.61***

12.45***

 

Management (M)

1.40 ns

42.0***

4.2*

18.4***

11.76**

8.98**

Site type

ST1

862.4 a

42,625 a

2.97 a

1.13 a

333.2 a

3.06 a

ST2

410.7 c

29,847 b

2.15 b

0.64 b

114.5 c

1.09 cb

ST3

261.2 d

18,563 d

1.37 c

0.27 c

41.7 d

0.41 dc

ST4

91.8 e

5960 f

0.52 d

0.00 c

9.2 d

0.11 d

ST5

484.0 b

24,918 c

2.01 b

0.71 b

174.6 b

1.58 b

ST6

425.8 c

13,436 fe

1.21 c

0.23 c

86.5 c

0.72 dcb

Management

CP

420.1 a

27,258 a

1.59 b

0.77 a

157.6 a

1.87 a

TP

421.0 a

17,318 c

1.76 a

0.20 c

93.2 b

0.63 b

CTP

428.4 a

23,099 b

1.76 a

0.52 b

129.0 a

0.98 b

  1. Different letter indicates significant differences between levels for a given factor
  2. CP cone production, TP timber production, CTP combination of cone and timber production
  3. Probability levels are indicated as *P ≤ 0.05,**P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ns: P > 0.05