Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the multivariate analyses (using both morphological and genetic variables) describing the three Quercus species studied

From: Using joint multivariate analyses of leaf morphology and molecular-genetic markers for taxon identification in three hybridizing European white oak species (Quercus spp.)

Variables

Abbr.

FAMD/HCPC

LDA

Contribution to FAMD

HCPC cluster 1

HCPC cluster 2

HCPC cluster 3

Standardized coefficient

LDA group 1

LDA group 2

LDA group 3

Dim. 1

Dim. 2

Q. robur

Q. pubescens

Q. petraea

LD1

LD2

Q. robur

Q. pubescens

Q. petraea

Morphological

 Basal shape

BS

7.27

0.00

5.32 ± 1.9

3.77 ± 1.53

3.7 ± 1.44

0.11

−0.05

5.31 ± 1.43

3.73 ± 1.54

3.76 ± 1.91

 Lamina shape/obversity

OB

3.57

0.22

62.98 ± 7.41

57.18 ± 7.57

58.23 ± 7.03

0.09

−0.03

63.15 ± 6.95

57.05 ± 7.49

58.37 ± 7.4

 Petiole ratio

PR

16.81

0.00

6.2 ± 2.33

13.18 ± 3.64

13.84 ± 3.89

−0.27

0.31

6.12 ± 3.79

13.4 ± 3.75

13.62 ± 2.27

 Lobe depth ratio

LDR

7.35

0.05

73.35 ± 10.16

65.67 ± 9.62

65.72 ± 9.89

0.05

0.26

73.13 ± 9.8

65.18 ± 9.79

66.63 ± 10.26

 Lobe depth ratio at widest sinus

LDRW

0.63

6.52

37.96 ± 8.55

39.51 ± 9.95

33.61 ± 7.53

−0.08

−0.37

37.91 ± 7.06

39.83 ± 9.67

32.8 ± 8.62

 Lobe number ratio

LLNR

4.93

2.17

0.45 ± 0.34

0.76 ± 0.39

0.59 ± 0.42

0.15

−0.35

0.47 ± 0.34

0.8 ± 0.43

0.5 ± 0.36

 Percentage venation

RPV

16.12

0.00

6.54 ± 1.63

3.33 ± 1.97

3.25 ± 1.64

0.41

−0.02

6.57 ± 1.55

3.22 ± 1.98

3.39 ± 1.63

 Lobe width ratio

LWR

0.08

0.31

30.02 ± 4.38

31.57 ± 4.84

30.9 ± 4.41

−0.05

−0.14

29.93 ± 4.35

31.4 ± 4.8

31.1 ± 4.42

 Presence of stellate hair on lamina

LS

5.78

19.65

0.01

0.07

0.84

Used for grouping

0.03

0.27

0.67

 Presence of stellate hair on vein

VS

0.11

0.44

0.00

0.00

0.02

Not used

0.00

0.00

0.01

 Presence of clustered hair on lamina

LC

6.56

19.65

0.01

0.96

0.18

Used for grouping

0.01

0.77

0.30

 Presence of clustered hair on vein

VC

3.12

21.30

0.00

0.70

0.03

Not used

0.01

0.53

0.13

 Presence of intermediate hair on lamina

LI

8.89

11.30

0.03

0.30

0.88

Not used

0.04

0.47

0.72

Genetic

 PCoA component 1

PCo1

17.58

0.66

0.17 ± 0.09

−0.06 ± 0.06

−0.11 ± 0.07

1.04

−0.13

0.18 ± 0.06

−0.06 ± 0.06

−0.12 ± 0.08

 PCoA component 2

PCo2

0.10

9.89

0.01 ± 0.08

−0.05 ± 0.09

0.04 ± 0.09

0.18

0.70

0.01 ± 0.07

−0.06 ± 0.08

0.06 ± 0.08

 PCoA component 3

PCo3

0.02

3.25

−0.01 ± 0.07

0.03 ± 0.09

−0.02 ± 0.09

−0.04

−0.41

0 ± 0.09

0.03 ± 0.09

−0.03 ± 0.07

 PCoA component 4

PCo4

0.45

3.10

−0.01 ± 0.07

0.03 ± 0.09

−0.01 ± 0.09

−0.24

−0.39

−0.01 ± 0.09

0.03 ± 0.09

−0.02 ± 0.07

 PCoA component 5

PCo5

0.21

0.58

0.01 ± 0.08

−0.01 ± 0.08

0.01 ± 0.08

0.16

0.21

0.01 ± 0.08

−0.01 ± 0.08

0 ± 0.08

 PCoA component 6

PCo6

0.42

0.91

−0.01 ± 0.09

0.02 ± 0.07

0.00 ± 0.07

−0.13

−0.23

−0.01 ± 0.07

0.02 ± 0.07

−0.01 ± 0.09

  1. Listed are the variables and their abbreviations; the contribution of each variable to the first two dimensions of the factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD); averages (± standard deviation) of the variables in the three clusters defined by hierarchical clustering of principal components (HCPC; in case of hair types, the proportion is given); contribution of each variable (standardized coefficient) to the first two linear discriminants of the linear discriminant analysis (LDA); averages (± standard deviation) of the variables in the three groups of the LDA (in case of hair types, the proportion is given). Values of LLNR are log-transformed; RPV is square root-transformed