From: Integrated and systemic management of storm damage by the forest-based sector and public authorities
 | Forest-based sector (FBS) | Public authorities (PA) |
---|---|---|
Strengths | • Strong operational know-how | • Financial capacity |
• Strong empirical knowledge | • Legislative power | |
• Large body of scientific knowledge | • Regulatory levers | |
Weaknesses | • Reluctance to manage risks | • Lack of public risk governance |
• Limited common strategy | • No integrated policy for forest risks | |
• Short versus long-term goals | • Unclear storm management strategy | |
• Private versus public behaviors | • Fragmented and unbalanced approach | |
• Lack of financial liquidity | • Complexity of cost-efficiency analyses | |
• Few long-term impact assessments | • Poor cooperation with other regions/states | |
• Share of knowledge (all levels) | • Staff, structures, and facilities | |
Opportunities | • Advanced decision support systems | • Advanced decision support systems |
• Innovation capacity | • Innovation capacity in the FBS | |
• Development of ICT solutions | • Development of ICT solutions | |
• Higher expectations towards forest | • Societal expectations towards forests | |
• Coordination initiatives | • Increase of societal risk awareness | |
• Increasing scientific knowledge | • Advanced economic impact assessments | |
• Emergence of new markets | • Role of forests in climate mitigation | |
Threats | • Macro-economic context | • Macro-economic context |
• Climatic and market uncertainties | • Public expectations | |
• Change resistance | • Change resistance | |
• Timber market disruption | • Shrinkage of financial resources | |
• Reduction of financial support | • Globalization of timber market | |
• Inappropriate legislation | • EU competition rules | |
• Rigid decisional framework | • Uncontrolled ideological issues | |
• Loss of experienced people | • Emotional management | |
• Lack of solidarity | • Uncertain impacts of climate change |