Table 4 Relative frequency (%) that a particular segregation approach achieved the highest ranking based on overall stumpage value for a given stand type and terrain type
Stand type and terrain type | Number of forest and market combinations | Stumpage top ranking (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NoSeg | PHISeg | LandSeg | CPYSeg | MillSeg | ||
Pruned and Not steep | 12 | 0 | 83 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
Pruned and Steep | 18 | 0 | 56 | 39 | 0 | 5 |
Unpruned and Not steep | 12 | 8 | 33 | 50 | 0 | 7 |
Unpruned and Steep | 18 | 17 | 11 | 50 | 0 | 22 |