Annals of Forest Science

Table 4 Abacus defining cutting conditions for planing giving a surface quality of oak acceptable to consumers without denibbing operation

From: Visuo-tactile and topographic characterizations of finished wood surface quality by French consumers and industrials: acceptability thresholds for raised grain

	Vf (m min⁻¹)
N (rpm)	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27	28	29	30
6000	0.11 (0.67)	0.12 (0.75)	0.13 (0.83)	0.14 (0.92)	0.16 (1)	0.17 (1.08)	0.18 (1.17)	0.2 (1.25)
7000	0.09 (0.57)	0.1 (0.64)	0.11 (0.71)	0.12 (0.79)	0.14 (0.86)	0.15 (0.93)	0.16 (1)	0.17 (1.07)	0.18 (1.14)	0.19 (1.21)
8000	0.08 (0.5)	0.09 (0.56)	0.1 (0.63)	0.11 (0.69)	0.12 (0.75)	0.13 (0.81)	0.14 (0.88)	0.15 (0.94)	0.16 (1)	0.17 (1.06)	0.18 (1.13)	0.19 (1.19)	0.2 (1.25)
9000	0.07 (0.44)	0.08 (0.5)	0.09 (0.56)	0.1 (0.61)	0.11 (0.67)	0.11 (0.72)	0.12 (0.78)	0.13 (0.83)	0.14 (0.89)	0.15 (0.94)	0.16 (1)	0.17 (1.06)	0.18 (1.11)	0.18 (1.17)	0.19 (1.22)
10,000	0.06 (0.4)	0.07 (0.45)	0.08 (0.5)	0.09 (0.55)	0.09 (0.6)	0.1 (0.65)	0.11 (0.70)	0.12 (0.75)	0.13 (0.8)	0.13 (0.85)	0.14 (0.9)	0.15 (0.95)	0.16 (1)	0.17 (1.05)	0.17 (1.10)	0.18 (1.15)	0.19 (1.20)	0.2 (1.25)
11,000	0.06 (0.36)	0.06 (0.41)	0.07 (0.45)	0.08 (0.5)	0.09 (0.55)	0.09 (0.6)	0.1 (0.64)	0.11 (0.68)	0.11 (0.73)	0.12 (0.77)	0.13 (0.82)	0.14 (0.86)	0.14 (0.91)	0.15 (0.95)	0.16 (1)	0.17 (1.05)	0.17 (1.09)	0.18 (1.14)	0.19 (1.18)	0.19 (1.23)
12,000	0.05 (0.33)	0.06 (0.38)	0.07 (0.42)	0.07 (0.46)	0.08 (0.5)	0.09 (0.54)	0.09 (0.58)	0.1 (0.63)	0.11 (0.67)	0.11 (0.71)	0.12 (0.75)	0.13 (0.79)	0.13 (0.83)	0.14 (0.88)	0.14 (0.92)	0.15 (0.96)	0.16 (1)	0.16 (1.04)	0.17 (1.08)	0.18 (1.13)	0.18 (1.17)	0.19 (1.21)	0.2 (1.25)

The top numbers correspond to the average chip thickness, em, in mm, and the numbers in parentheses correspond to the feed rate per tooth, fz, in mm/tooth/rev

Back to article page

ISSN: 1297-966X

Contact us

Submission enquiries: annforsci@inrae.fr
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com