Skip to main content

Table 4 Context, objectives and timescales for resistant tree programmes. N (native), NN (Non-native), USFS (US Forest Service), IETIC (Inland Empire Tree Improvement Co-operative)

From: Key lessons from resistant tree breeding programmes in the Northern Hemisphere

 

Organisation

 

The American Chestnut Foundation (TACF)

American Chestnut Co-operators Foundation (ACCF)

B.C. Ministry of Forests

Italian Institute of Plant Protection

Several North American programmes3

Context and objectives

Region

North America

North America

Europe

North America

Tree

American chestnut

Sitka spruce

Several species of elm

Western White Pine

Threat

Chestnut blightNN

White pine weevilN

Dutch Elm DiseaseNN

White Pine Blister RustNN

Severity

Very high

High

Very high

High

Impacts

Cultural value

Timber production

Aesthetic

Timber production

Biodiversity

 

Costs to remove dead and diseased trees

Disease control costs

Forest structure and functioning

 

Forest ecology

Commercial use

 

Cultural

 

Organisation

Not-for-profit

Not-for-profit

Government

Research institute

Government (+ industry and universities for IETIC)

Objectives

- Species restoration for cultural, environmental, economic and biological values

- Raising awareness

- Restoration of pure-bred American chestnut particularly for cultural and environmental value

- Raising awareness

- Produce resistant Sitka spruce for economic value

- Restoration, particularly for urban and landscaping uses

- Primarily for economic value, but also ecological and environmental benefit

Timescales and costs

Start date

19831

19801

Provenance trial in 1974. Screening trials from 1984

Late 1970s2

Several programmes, beginning in 1950s and 1960s

Investment

- $2.7 million in 2015

- USFS tests cost $1200–12,000 ha−1 (establishment) and $1200–2400 ha−1 year−1 (maintenance)

?

?

?

- Total IETIC costs $4.1m (1978–2006). Cost $236,459 in 2005, but also some income from seed sale (IETIC 2007)

Status

- Resistant seed produced in several orchards

- Ongoing tests to confirm resistance

- Intend general distribution in a few years

- Ongoing breeding and testing of the most resistant material

- Putatively resistant material now supplied to volunteers for planting

- Large-scale deployment of material from breeding programmes

- Guidelines for planting resistant material

- Five patented cultivars released to market (1997–2011)

- Ongoing breeding to improve resistance and viability against other threats

- Partially resistant material planted operationally over substantial areas

- Ongoing testing and breeding

  1. ?indicates that information could not be obtained from the literature consulted
  2. 1Incorporates previous knowledge of field resistance and material produced during earlier programmes by Connecticut Agricultural Experimentation Station and USFS
  3. 2Builds on material produced in earlier resistant elm programmes, particularly in the Netherlands
  4. 3Several semi-independent programmes in different regions of USA and Canada employing similar approaches