Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of correct indications in different sample set ups with stimuli and blanks

From: Using synthetic semiochemicals to train canines to detect bark beetle–infested trees

Dog ID

Sample set-up1

Target scent

Response type

Stimuli age

Correct indications

(n/trial)

1 h

6 h

36 h

n

%

Mean

both dogs

Number of indications

A

1

Methylbutenol

CPa (16)

16

16

16

48

100

 

CN (48)

32

28

31

91

63

 

B

CP (16)

13

16

16

45

94

97%

CN (48)

30

27

29

86

60

61%

A

2a

Methylbutenol and cis-verbenol

CP (12 + 12)

24

20

23

67

93

 

CN (40)

23

18

17

58

48

 

B

CP (12 + 12)

23

21

22

66

92

92%

CN (40)

17

14

22

53

44

46%

A

2b

Ipsdienol and verbenone

CP (8 + 8)

16

16

16

48

100

 

CN (48)

47

44

36

127

88

 

B

CP (8 + 8)

16

16

16

48

100

100%

CN (48)

43

28

31

102

71

80%

A

3

cis-Verbenol, ipsdienol, and verbenone

CP (4 + 16 + 4)

23

22

24

69

96

 

CN (40)

37

40

33

110

92

 

B

CP (4 + 16 + 4)

24

22

24

70

97

97%

CN (40)

31

36

32

99

83

87%

  1. 1Arrangement of positive (target) and disturbance (non-target) stimuli, see Figure A in ESM_2 (Johansson et al. (2019))
  2. CP, correct positive; CN, correct negative