Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the ANOVA showing the direct and the interaction effects of RDIc, HBc, and SSc on the three indices of growth response to drought (resistance, resilience, and recovery; n = 269 trees). The Tukey multiple comparisons of means. The number of * corresponds to the p values (*, **, and ***: 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001). See text for details

From: Decreasing stand density favors resistance, resilience, and recovery of Quercus petraea trees to a severe drought, particularly on dry sites

  

Df

Sum Sq

Mean Sq

F value

Pr (> F)

Resistance (Rt)

RDIc

2

2.005

1.0025

12.33

< 0.0000***

HBc

2

5.165

2.5826

31.765

< 0.0000***

SSc

2

0.133

0.0664

0.817

0.4429

RDIc:HBc

3

1.121

0.3737

4.596

0.0038**

RDIc:SSc

4

0.13

0.0325

0.4

0.8088

HBc:SSc

4

0.078

0.0195

0.24

0.9157

Residuals

251

20.407

0.0813

  

Resilience (Rs)

RDIc

2

10.422

5.211

67.346

< 0.0000***

HBc

2

5.168

2.584

33.397

< 0.0000***

SSc

2

0.958

0.479

6.189

0.00238**

RDIc:HBc

3

1.5

0.5

6.464

0.00031***

RDIc:SSc

4

0.691

0.173

2.234

0.06592

HBc:SSc

4

0.641

0.16

2.072

0.08502

Residuals

251

19.422

0.077

  

Recovery (Rc)

RDIc

2

4.91

2.4573

18.267

< 0.0000***

HBc

2

0.85

0.4225

3.141

< 0.0000**

SSc

2

1.14

0.5703

4.24

0.01546**

RDIc:HBc

3

2.85

0.9485

7.051

0.00014***

RDIc:SSc

4

0.84

0.2089

1.553

0.18743

HBc:SSc

4

0.72

0.1808

1.344

0.25414

Residuals

251

33.76

0.1345

 Â