Table 4 Convergence diagnostics (95% quantile of potential scale reduction factor) for parameters of the asymmetric size-dependent competition model fitted to data for the 15 studied stands of Quercus robur
Forest stand | g m | x 0 | x b | a | β | σ | ϕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
B | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.01 |
C | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
D | 1.00 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
E | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
F | 1.02 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
G | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
H | 1.00 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
I | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 1.00 | 1.01 |
K | 1.01 | 1.08 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.01 |
L | 1.00 | 1.02 | 1.05 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
M | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.06 | 1.05 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
O | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
P | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Q | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 |