Table 2 Mean relative importance of each variable to the final ensemble model of each species studied for all environmental predictors plus spatial filters model (CLIM + NCLIM + SPAT). The variables highlighted in italics are the five top-ranked importance factors for each species
Species | CLIM | NCLIM | SPAT | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIO3 | BIO4 | BIO15 | BIO19 | CST | HII | LUCC | PC | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | |
Q. aquifolioides | 6 . 3 | 18 . 7 | 3.9 | 7 . 6 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 17 . 5 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 6 . 3 | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Q. longispica | 10 . 7 | 14 . 9 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 5 . 7 | 11 . 1 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 9 . 0 | 4.7 | 3.6 |
Q. monimotricha | 8 . 2 | 17 . 8 | 2.9 | 5.5 | 2.7 | 19 . 3 | 9 . 9 | 5 . 5 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 2.7 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 3.6 |
Q. pannosa | 5.5 | 22 . 9 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 7 . 3 | 11 . 5 | 5.7 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 6 . 3 | 3.3 | 7 . 8 | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Q. spinosa | 10 . 0 | 10 . 2 | 4.0 | 6 . 7 | 3.9 | 17 . 4 | 17 . 8 | 5.3 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
Q. senescens | 7 . 4 | 22 . 6 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 5.4 | 5 . 6 | 12 . 5 | 8 . 7 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Q. guyavaefolia | 4.9 | 15 . 7 | 5.3 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 5.7 | 10 . 8 | 7 . 9 | 7 . 0 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 8 . 3 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 4.1 |
Mean | 7 . 6 | 17 . 5 | 4.1 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 9 . 3 | 13 . 0 | 6 . 0 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 5.2 | 3.2 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 3.7 |