Skip to main content

Table 6 Evaluation of the goodness-of-fit of the complete distribution for each Gsp, by stand type and per treatment

From: Density and diameter distributions of saplings in naturally regenerated and planted coniferous stands in Québec after various approaches of commercial thinning

    

Stand type

 

Treatments

  

Total

 

Natural stands

Plantations

 

TrT0

TrTElite

TrT1/3

TrTBF

White spruce

R2

72.05

 

11.38

69.92

 

84.46

66.95

54.34

73.76

RMSE

13.73

 

8.78

14.47

 

11.52

13.25

15.89

14.09

Kolmogorv-Smirnov (D-value)

0.0512

 

0.1852

0.0625

 

0.0625

0.0694

0.0877

0.0617

Kolmogorv-Smirnov (p value)

0.3321

 

0.0493

0.2106

 

0.9412

0.4910

0.5262

0.9981

Balsam fir

R2

81.19

 

78.95

71.12

 

84.69

76.38

88.04

36.99

RMSE

42.10

 

64.53

24.83

 

28.22

52.95

38.98

6.68

Kolmogorv-Smirnov (D-value)

0.0375

 

0.0651

0.0463

 

0.0833

0.0702

0.0870

0.1250

Kolmogorv-Smirnov (p value)

0.6280

 

0.6372

0.6091

 

0.5596

0.3688

0.4143

0.6272

Hardwoods

R2

54.27

 

32.55

59.59

 

66.42

43.49

49.99

73.77

RMSE

27.26

 

28.72

26.78

 

19.68

35.73

20.70

26.08

Kolmogorv-Smirnov (D-value)

0.0950

 

0.1185

0.0993

 

0.1032

0.1111

0.1790

0.1975

Kolmogorv-Smirnov (p value)

0.0130

 

0.2993

0.0309

 

0.5137

0.1938

0.0111

0.0848