Q. no | Question | Answer | Responses | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | Austria | Czechia | Germany | Hungary | Poland | Slovakia |
1 | Do you consider genetic diversity of forest trees to be important? | Yes | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
n = 49 | No | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
 | Uncertain | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
2 | Do you consider forest genetic diversity in your management plans? | Yes | 83 | 100 | 71 | 100 | 41 | 57 |
n = 49 | No | 17 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 29 | 43 | |
 | Uncertain | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 29 | 0 | |
3 | Do you feel you are well-informed about forest genetic diversity? | Yes | 42 | 40 | 43 | 100 | 53 | 14 |
n = 49 | No | 42 | 60 | 43 | 0 | 41 | 43 | |
 | Uncertain | 17 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 43 | |
4 | Do you expect changes of your conservation area due to climate change? | Yes | 100 | 40 | 100 | 100 | 88 | 71 |
n = 49 | No | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 | |
 | Uncertain | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
4.1 | If yes, will it have any influence on the conservation objectives? | Will be easier to reach? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
n = 49 | Will be more difficult to reach? | 8 | 40 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 29 | |
 | Conservation objectives will not change | 67 | 20 | 29 | 0 | 59 | 29 | |
 | Will not have any influence on the conservation objectives | 25 | 40 | 29 | 100 | 0 | 14 | |
 | No answer | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 12 | 29 | |
5 | Do you consider climate change in your management planning | Yes | 67 | 60 | 71 | 0 | 35 | 43 |
n = 49 | No | 33 | 40 | 29 | 100 | 41 | 57 | |
 | Uncertain | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | |
6 | Do you consider planting and afforestation/reforestation activities in order to improve forest ecosystem services, in particular to increase forest stability in climate change? | Yes | 50 | 100 | 43 | 100 | 65 | 57 |
n = 49 | No | 50 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 29 | 43 | |
 | Uncertain | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
6.1 | If yes, how do you select forest reproductive material? | I use material of our own forests (seeds, seedlings…) | 67 | 80 | 33 | 100 | 40 | 0 |
I use material from the closest nursery | 0 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 20 | 0 | ||
Other | 33 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | ||
I have never used FRM in the area | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 33 | ||
6.2 | Do you take national regions of provenance into account when selecting the planting material? | Yes | 88 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 56 | 33 |
No | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | ||
Don’t know | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | ||
Never used FRM | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 50 | ||
6.3 | Have you ever used planting material in the area from other regions outside your country? | Yes | 33 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
No | 67 | 100 | 71 | 100 | 100 | 86 | ||
6.3.1 | If yes, why? | Unavailability of domestic seeds/seedlings | 0 | Â | 100 | Â | Â | 100 |
Less expensive reproductive material | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Better genetic material (i.e., better growth, stem form) | 50 | Â | 0 | Â | Â | 0 | ||
Better adaption to expected climate conditions | 50 | Â | 0 | Â | Â | 0 | ||
6.4 | Would you use planting material from other regions outside your country? | Yes | 25 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 29 |
No | 75 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 88 | 71 | ||
7 | Have you ever received subsidies for planting activities? | Yes | 30 | 40 | 29 | 100 | 41 | 0 |
n = 49 | No | 40 | 40 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 43 | |
 | Never used FRM | 30 | 20 | 43 | 0 | 29 | 57 | |
8 | Please rank the following aspects regarding the importance for the conservation activities in the area: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
n = 49 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |
[1] Plant tree provenances fit for climate change (also from other countries) | Very important | 8 | 20 | 43 | 0 | 12 | 14 | |
Important | 33 | 60 | 14 | 0 | 41 | 43 | ||
Less important | 17 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 12 | 29 | ||
Not important | 33 | 0 | 14 | 100 | 18 | 0 | ||
No answer | 8 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 14 | ||
[2] Keep the tree composition of the area the same | Very important | 50 | 20 | 29 | 0 | 53 | 29 | |
Important | 33 | 40 | 29 | 0 | 47 | 14 | ||
Less important | 0 | 20 | 29 | 100 | 0 | 43 | ||
Not important | 17 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | ||
No answer | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
[3] Use of domestic seeds and plants | Very important | 42 | 40 | 43 | 0 | 71 | 29 | |
Important | 17 | 60 | 43 | 100 | 29 | 71 | ||
Less important | 33 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Not important | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
No answer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
[4] Minimize anthropogenic influence in the area | Very important | 50 | 60 | 29 | 100 | 71 | 14 | |
Important | 8 | 20 | 14 | 0 | 29 | 71 | ||
Less important | 33 | 20 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 14 | ||
Not important | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
No answer | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
9 | How big is the conservation area of your organization in ha | Not answered | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
n = 49 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |
10 | Please specify the category of the conservation area (IUCN categories): | Strict nature reserve | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
n = 45 | Wilderness area | 20 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
 | National park | 40 | 60 | 33 | 0 | 63 | 43 | |
 | National monument or natural feature | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
 | Habitat management area/species management area | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | |
 | Protected landscape/protected seascape | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | |
 | Protected area with sustainable use of natural resources (managed resource protected area) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
 | Other: | 20 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
 | NA = no response |  |  |  |  |  |  |