Q. no | Question | Answer | Responses | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | Austria | Czechia | Germany | Hungary | Poland | Slovakia |
1 | Do you consider genetic diversity of forest trees to be important? | Yes | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 96 | 94 |
n = 510 | No | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
 | Uncertain | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | |
2 | Do you consider forest genetic diversity in your management plans? | Yes | 81 | 91 | 84 | 79 | 87 | 76 |
n = 510 | No | 12 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 18 | |
 | Uncertain | 7 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 6 | |
3 | Do you feel you are well-informed about forest genetic diversity? | Yes | 50 | 73 | 44 | 53 | 84 | 34 |
n = 510 | No | 41 | 14 | 38 | 32 | 7 | 54 | |
 | Uncertain | 8 | 14 | 18 | 16 | 9 | 12 | |
4 | Do you consider climate change in your management planning? | Yes | 91 | 64 | 92 | 84 | 38 | 88 |
n = 508 | No | 8 | 14 | 4 | 16 | 48 | 8 | |
 | Uncertain | 2 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 4 | |
5 | Do you expect changes in your forest area due to climate change? | Yes | 95 | 82 | 93 | 100 | 69 | 85 |
n = 510 | No | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 6 | |
 | Uncertain | 1 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 22 | 9 | |
5.1 | If yes, will it have any influence on the management objectives? | (a) Will be easier to reach | 6 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 4 | 9 |
n = 433 | (b) Will be more difficult to reach | 81 | 72 | 72 | 53 | 36 | 74 | |
 | (c) Management objectives will change | 13 | 17 | 16 | 37 | 61 | 16 | |
 | (d) No influence | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
6 | Do you consider planting and afforestation/reforestation activities in order to improve forest ecosystem services, in particular to increase forest stability in climate change? | Yes | 95 | 95 | 97 | 63 | 84 | 96 |
n = 507 | No | 5 | 5 | 3 | 21 | 4 | 0 | |
 | Uncertain | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 12 | 4 | |
6.1 | If yes, how do you select FRM? | (a) I use material of our own forests (seeds, seedlings…) | 63 | 62 | 54 | 67 | 84 | 48 |
n = 507 | (b) I use material from the closest nursery | 30 | 29 | 43 | 25 | 14 | 33 | |
 | (c) Other | 7 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 19 | |
 | (d) I have never used FRM in the area | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
6.2 | If yes, do you take national regions of provenance into account when selecting the planting material? | (a) Yes | 98 | 100 | 97 | 100 | 100 | 98 |
(b) No | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
n = 447 | (c) Uncertain | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
 | (d) Never used FRM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
6.3 | Have you ever used planting material in this area from other regions outside your country? | (a) Yes | 18 | 14 | 22 | 19 | 2 | 4 |
n = 495 | (b) No | 75 | 86 | 75 | 75 | 97 | 96 | |
 | (c) Uncertain | 7 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | |
6.3.1 | If yes, why? | Unavailability of domestic seeds/seedlings | 56 | 33 | 43 | 100 | 43 | 33 |
 | Less expensive reproductive material | 6 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 33 | |
 | Better genetic material (i.e., better growth, stem form) | 17 | 33 | 21 | 0 | 29 | 0 | |
 | Better adaption to expected climate conditions | 22 | 33 | 29 | 0 | 14 | 33 | |
6.4 | Would you use planting material from other regions outside your country? | Yes | 24 | 23 | 43 | 26 | 13 | 24 |
n = 503 | No | 64 | 64 | 41 | 53 | 55 | 73 | |
 | Uncertain | 12 | 14 | 17 | 21 | 32 | 2 | |
7 | Have you ever received subsidies for planting activities? | Yes | 27 | 95 | 77 | 89 | 67 | 58 |
n = 489 | No | 72 | 5 | 23 | 11 | 33 | 42 | |
 | Uncertain | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
8 | Please rank the following aspects regarding the importance for the management activities in the area: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
n = 507 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |
8.1 | Plant tree provenances fit for climate change (also from other countries) | (a) Very important | 47 | 41 | 49 | 11 | 19 | 42 |
n = 506 | (b) Important | 39 | 36 | 40 | 63 | 59 | 46 | |
 | (c) Less important | 9 | 9 | 8 | 26 | 15 | 6 | |
 | (d) Not important | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
 | (e) No answer | 2 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | |
8.2 | Keep the tree composition of the area the same | (a) Very important | 26 | 14 | 7 | 21 | 68 | 14 |
n = 507 | (b) Important | 51 | 41 | 49 | 32 | 31 | 36 | |
 | (c) Less important | 19 | 27 | 34 | 47 | 0 | 42 | |
 | (d) Not important | 3 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
 | (e) No answer | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
8.3 | Use of domestic seeds and plants | (a) Very important | 54 | 68 | 27 | 68 | 48 | 60 |
n = 509 | (b) Important | 36 | 27 | 57 | 32 | 46 | 32 | |
 | (c) Less important | 9 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 8 | |
 | (d) Not important | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
 | (e) No answer | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
8.4 | Minimize anthropogenic influence in the area | (a) Very important | 3 | 64 | 3 | 37 | 31 | 38 |
n = 506 | (b) Important | 30 | 27 | 13 | 42 | 52 | 46 | |
 | (c) Less important | 38 | 9 | 54 | 11 | 16 | 10 | |
 | (d) Not important | 25 | 0 | 28 | 11 | 0 | 4 | |
 | (e) No answer | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
9 | Do you think the national legislation on seed transfer is well-adapted in times of climate change? | Yes | 28 | 18 | 34 | 16 | 36 | 48 |
n = 501 | No | 26 | 41 | 31 | 26 | 19 | 30 | |
 | Uncertain | 45 | 41 | 35 | 58 | 45 | 22 | |
10 | Do you think the European legislation on seed transfer is well-adapted in times of climate change? | Yes | 9 | 5 | 14 | 5 | 11 | 10 |
n = 498 | No | 27 | 9 | 19 | 37 | 8 | 22 | |
 | Uncertain | 64 | 86 | 66 | 58 | 81 | 68 | |
11 | How big is the forest area of your organization (ha)? | Not answered | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
12 | Please specify the ownership of the forest: | (a) Public | 29 | 50 | 62 | 61 | 3 | 2 |
n = 496 | (b) Private | 67 | 45 | 21 | 33 | 83 | 20 | |
 | (c) Both | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
 | (d) Other | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 78 |