Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences in symmetric component, asymmetric component, and leaf size among lineages determined by the Scheffe post hoc comparison test (P < 0.05)

From: Genetic, geographic, and climatic factors jointly shape leaf morphology of an alpine oak, Quercus aquifolioides Rehder & E.H. Wilson

Lineages

Symmetric component

Asymmetric component

Leaf size

Mean ± S.D

Groups

Mean ± S.D

Groups

Mean ± S.D

Groups

WSP-HDM

0.01 ± 0.07

A

0 ± 0.02

A

741.67 ± 145.52

B

Tibet

 − 0.03 ± 005

B

0 ± 0.02

A

814.74 ± 115.22

A

Mix

0 ± 0.04

AB

0 ± 0.02

A

817.21 ± 84.84

A

  1. Values are means + S.D. (n = 273); the group “A” significantly differs from the group “B”