Skip to main content

Table 5 Demographic histories of Taxus baccata populations inferred using the Approximate Bayesian Computing approach. Pr(const. Ne), the posterior probability of the scenario of constant population size, Pr(var. Ne), the posterior probability of the scenario of varying population size; N0μ, the posterior estimates of the current effective population size multiplied by the mean mutation rate μ, NAμ, the posterior estimates of the effective population size of the ancestral population; τ = , the mutation-scaled number of generations backward in time to the demographic event; 95% CI, the 95% credible interval for estimates

From: Trunk perimeter correlates with genetic bottleneck intensity and the level of genetic diversity in populations of Taxus baccata L

Population

Pr(const. Ne)

Pr(var. Ne)

Mode

N0μ

NAμ

τ

Median

95% CI

Mode

Median

95% CI

Mode

Median

95% CI

Bogdaniec

0.001

0.999

0.013

0.014

0.004,0.035

0.70

1.47

0.249,8.32

0.008

0.015

0.002,0.099

Cisowa Góra A

0.263

0.737

0.480

0.480

0.099,0.813

2.29

21.0

1.22,71

1.17

1.81

0.042,6.75

Cisowa Góra B

0.193

0.807

0.477

0.502

0.216,0.807

5.48

27.7

1.82,85.1

1.95

2.67

0.219,8.57

Czarne

0.026

0.974

0.429

0.439

0.114,0.758

2.74

21.6

1.71,74.5

1.44

1.72

0.082,6.69

Czersk

0.05

0.951

0.275

0.279

0.101,0.518

1.61

2.56

0.323,6.94

0.079

0.409

0.023,3.06

Kórnik

0.255

0.746

0.070

0.086

0.017,0.232

1.86

4.63

0.494,22.8

0.038

0.087

0.005,0.62

Łagów

0.005

0.995

0.127

0.142

0.038,0.351

3.10

7.8

0.938,36.5

0.090

0.223

0.022,1.51

Radomice

0.153

0.847

0.242

0.261

0.091,0.481

1.82

14.6

0.664,51.6

0.656

1.06

0.054,4.14

Rokita

0.353

0.647

0.037

0.046

0.012,0.125

1.36

3.15

0.431,16.8

0.021

0.052

0.005,0.380

Tychowo

0.312

0.688

0.266

0.263

0.089,0.526

3.54

14.3

1.44,59.2

0.427

0.769

0.084,3.81

Wierzchlas

0.354

0.646

0.275

0.271

0.064,0.543

1.71

11.6

0.747,45.1

0.272

0.606

0.026,3.15