Skip to main content

Table 8 Stand structural characteristics of beech, mixed (beech-oak), oak and linden forests (means (SD), averaged over the three transects, n = number of plots). Plots dominated by beech: all plots with basal area of F. sylvatica > 66.6%, oak: all plots with basal area of Quercus species > 66.6%, linden: all plots with basal area of T. tomentosa: > 66.6%, mixed: all other forests (except for stands with T. tomentosa > 66.6%) for the three transects (A, B, C). Stem ha−1, DBH, height (h), basal area (BA), stem volume (Vol) and carbon in stem biomass (AGC). Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between forest types are indicated by different small letters (one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test)

From: Climate warming-induced replacement of mesic beech by thermophilic oak forests will reduce the carbon storage potential in aboveground biomass and soil

 

Beech (n = 69)

Mixed (n = 106)

Oak (n = 52)

Linden (n = 38)

Stem [ha−1]

636.3 (311.3) a

869.3 (469.8) b

733.4 (267.4) a b

1234.7 (486.4) a b

DBH [cm]

26.8 (14.4) a

21.3 (12.3) b

23.0 (11.4) b

20.1 (9.7) b

h [m]

26.5 (6.2) a

20.5 (7.2) c

17.7 (7.5) b

20.5 (6.7) c

BA [m2 ha−1]

46.2 (3.2) a

41.3 (14.2) b

37.8 (9.5) b

48.5 (13.3) a

Vol [m3 ha−1]

621.9 (211.5) a

499.2 (229.8) b c

446.1 (149.1) c

544.6 (191.8) a b

AGC [Mg C ha−1]

180.9 (61.6) a

137.2 (60.3) b

141.3 (46.7) b

125.3 (41.6) b