The role of wood harvest from sustainably managed forests in the carbon cycle

Table 1 Comparison of ecosystem flux data and ecosystem lateral fluxes. [gC m⁻² year⁻¹]. Percent values indicate managed as percent of protected from the same data source

Parameter	Source	unmanaged	managed
Gross Primary Production, GPP	Schulze et al. 2009	1107	1107
	Herbst et al. 2015; Knohl personal commun ication	1575	1627
	Noormets et al., 2015: Luyssaert database	1562	1698
	Noormets et al., 2015: Bond-Lamberty database	1989	1887
Ecosystem respiration, Reco	Schulze et al. 2009	857	857
	Herbst et al. 2015; Knohl personal commun ication	1063	1042
	Noormets et al., 2015: Luyssaert database	1460	1460
	Noormets et al., 2015: Bond-Lamberty database	1698	1384
GPP-Reco	Schulze et al. 2009	250	250
	Herbst et al. 2015; Knohl personal commun ication	512	585
	Noormets et al., 2015: Luyssaert database	102	238
	Noormets et al., 2015: Bond-Lamberty database	291	503
ecosystem turnover and plant respiration	leaf and root turnover (Bond Lamberty database)	377	491
	plant respiration (Luyssaert database)	1133	1460
	soil respiration (Luyssaet database)	923	1013
	sum	2056	2473
ecosystem storage and export	Change in stand volume (Schulze et al. 2020; Schulze et al. 2020a,b)	0,4 - 225	35
	Change in soil Carbon (Wellbrock et al. 2019)	40	40
	harvest (Schulze et al. 2020)	0	230
	sum	40,4 - 265	305

ISSN: 1297-966X