Skip to main content

Table 2 Parameters used to estimate the genetic structure of the Ulmus laevis populations studied, averaged across six nuclear microsatellite loci

From: Population history, genetic variation, and conservation status of European white elm (Ulmus laevis Pall.) in Poland

CODE

A

Ae

AR11

Pa

Ho

He

Fis

N0 %

WIR

4.0

2.6

3.8

0

0.635

0.540

−0.139

0.18

GRZ

4.0

2.3

3.6

0

0.639

0.542

−0.186

0.00

POJ

4.0

2.3

3.1

0

0.638

0.540

−0.214

0.00

TRB

4.0

2.3

3.4

0

0.636

0.539

−0.118

1.02

ZRB

4.0

2.3

3.0

0

0.635

0.538

−0.169

0.80

OLO

4.0

2.3

3.3

0

0.638

0.541

−0.135

0.48

LEM

4.0

2.3

3.2

0

0.635

0.538

−0.146

0.33

SŁO

4.0

2.3

3.5

0

0.634

0.539

−0.078

1.53

URA

4.2

2.4

3.3

0

0.637

0.573

−0.101

1.12

KLE

5.7

2.5

3.9

2

0.595

0.573

−0.030

2.90

BIE

4.8

2.5

3.5

1

0.675

0.585

−0.144

2.48

BRZ

4.1

2.4

3.6

0

0.640

0.548

−0.167

2.86

WIC

4.1

2.4

3.8

0

0.640

0.549

−0.035

2.25

URW

4.1

2.4

3.7

0

0.641

0.550

−0.161

0.06

CZL

4.0

2.3

3.8

0

0.648

0.549

−0.069

0.69

DWU

4.0

2.3

3.6

0

0.646

0.549

−0.102

1.91

SOK

4.0

2.3

3.1

0

0.645

0.546

−0.253

0.0

BIL

4.0

2.3

3.3

1

0.650

0.547

−0.178

0.30

WIL

4.0

2.3

3.6

1

0.645

0.548

−0.114

0.91

BJL

4.0

2.3

2.2

1

0.643

0.542

−0.362

0.00

WIW

4.0

2.3

3.6

0

0.635

0.540

−0.164

0.00

LAM

3.7

2.1

3.1

0

0.608

0.529

−0.133

1.39

ROZ

4.0

2.3

3.8

0

0.636

0.541

−0.123

0.56

LOP

4.0

2.3

3.3

0

0.634

0.539

−0.173

0.00

WIK

4.0

2.3

3.8

0

0.638

0.544

−0.118

0.74

OLR

4.0

2.3

3.5

0

0.639

0.545

−0.111

2.91

LUS

4.0

2.3

2.8

0

0.650

0.547

−0.321

1.61

KRZ

3.9

2.3

2.6

0

0.643

0.539

−0.244

0.02

MEL

4.0

2.4

3.7

0

0.645

0.567

−0.110

2.05

BAB

4.0

2.4

3.0

0

0.643

0.552

−0.219

7.40

KLC

4.0

2.3

3.7

0

0.639

0.542

−0.033

2.48

SKU

4.0

2.3

3.6

1

0.642

0.542

−0.166

1.32

POD

4.1

2.3

3.7

2

0.639

0.547

−0.028

0.80

SZC

4.1

2.3

3.4

0

0.638

0.546

−0.177

0.97

TUM

3.9

2.3

3.2

1

0.645

0.543

−0.114

0.51

GRA

3.9

2.3

3.4

0

0.646

0.541

−0.171

0.82

BOB

3.9

2.3

3.5

4

0.645

0.540

−0.181

0.31

MAK

3.9

2.3

3.2

0

0.647

0.543

−0.157

2.28

PRZ

4.1

2.3

3.9

0

0.647

0.554

−0.117

1.33

KAL

4.0

2.3

3.5

0

0.640

0.544

−0.166

0.04

STU

4.0

2.3

3.2

0

0.640

0.544

−0.198

2.20

Mean

4.2

2.4

4.0

0.05

0.641

0.553

0.149

1.21

  1. A average number of alleles, Ae effective number of alleles, AR average allelic richness (after rarefaction), Pa number of private alleles, He unbiased expected heterozygosity, Ho observed heterozygosity, N0 (%) null allele frequency, Fis Wright’s fixation index (all not significantly differ from zero). The population codes are shown in Table 1