Skip to main content

Table 11 Prediction bias (%) of the simple NLME H–D model of N. pumilio in stand 2 and stand 12, respectively

From: Determination of optimal tree height models and calibration designs for Araucaria araucana and Nothofagus pumilio in mixed stands affected to different levels by anthropogenic disturbance in South-Central Chile

Alternatives

Simple NLME model

Generalized NLME model

Stand

Bias (%)

Stand

Bias (%)

Stand

Bias (%)

Stand

Bias (%)

Only diameters/only diameters and stand variables are measured

2

 − 6.282

12

 − 16.438

2

 − 9.184

12

 − 36.010

 + 1 height random tree

 − 6.176

 − 16.213

 − 9.139

 − 36.005

 + 2 height random trees

 − 6.179

 − 15.886

 − 9.214

 − 36.010

 + 3 height random trees

 − 6.232

 − 15.656

 − 9.206

 − 36.119

 + 4 height random trees

 − 6.256

 − 15.551

 − 9.214

 − 36.066

 + 5 height random trees

 − 5.805

 − 15.406

 − 9.078

 − 36.083

 + 6 height random trees

 − 6.052

 − 15.049

 − 9.323

 − 36.057

 + 7 height random trees

 − 5.969

 − 14.765

 − 9.318

 − 36.210

 + 8 height random trees

 − 5.967

 − 14.736

 − 9.302

 − 36.187

Individual fit to data from each stand (ONLS)

0.148

0.018

  
  1. Bold, statistics of selected models