Skip to main content
  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Leaf morphological and genetic differentiation between Quercus robur L. and its closest relative, the drought-tolerant Quercus pedunculiflora K. Koch

Abstract

• Introduction

The study of phenotypic and genetic differentiation between incipient species or species that have recently diverged provides insights into the evolutionary history of species complexes and may contribute to our understanding of how species will evolve in contrasting environmental conditions.

• Objective

Here, we characterise the differences in leaf morphology and we estimate the genetic differentiation between Quercus robur and its closest relative, the drought-tolerant Quercus pedunculiflora. We have examined whether these two ecologically divergent taxa have different genetic structures using both nuclear and chloroplast markers.

• Results

By analysing 844 individual trees from seven Q. robur and seven Q. pedunculiflora populations and one mixed forest containing both taxa, we found that abaxial laminar pubescence is the most discriminating leaf descriptor between Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora. The analysis of seven enzyme-coding gene loci revealed no taxon-specific alleles with a frequency > 0.03. The DNA chloroplast haplotypes observed in Q. pedunculiflora have been found in our Q. robur sample or have been previously reported in Q. robur.

• Conclusions

The very low level of nuclear divergence revealed by the isozyme markers and the incomplete sorting of Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora populations according to their physical appearance suggests that Q. pedunculiflora is an incipient oak species and that the process of ecological speciation is not completed.

1 Introduction

In species-rich tree genera, such as Quercus (oaks), there is often a debate regarding the exact number of species (Rushton 1993). This happens because the species delineation is sometimes a very difficult task (De Queiroz 2007). Traditionally, morphological and ecological criteria are used to delimit one species from another. However, in the last years, genetic data are increasingly used in addressing the species status, as for example in the case of oaks (Muir et al. 2000). When species have only recently diverged or the speciation is ongoing, the phenotypic and genetic differentiation between species is very low. The morphological divergence may be limited to several flower and leaf characters (e.g. in oaks, Schwarz 1993), while the genetic differences may be restricted to a few genomic regions under selection (Turner and Hahn 2007).

In contrast to Quercus robur L, the most widespread oak species in Europe, Quercus pedunculiflora K. Koch has a more restricted distribution in south-eastern Europe, from Balkan Peninsula across Crimea to the Caucasus and northern part of Anatolia (Schwarz 1993; Menitsky 2005). Both taxa are members of the section Robur, series Pedunculatae Schwarz. Q. pedunculiflora is phenotypically very similar to Q. robur, the pedunculate oak (Schwarz 1937; Georgescu and Cretzoiu 1941). There are small morphological differences such as the length of the cupula peduncle, which is usually longer in Q. pedunculiflora, or the pubescence on the abaxial surface of the leaf (Schwarz 1993). While Q. robur prefers wetter soils which can be subject to flooding for short periods of time, Q. pedunculiflora grows under dry conditions being more drought tolerant (Stanescu et al. 1997; Donita et al. 2004). Its taxonomic position either as distinct species or as subspecies (ecotype) of Q. robur sensu lato is a subject of debate among botanists (Georgescu and Morariu 1948; Ciocarlan 2000; Donita et al. 2004; Broshtilov 2006).

Because of its adaptations to a more arid climate, Q. pedunculiflora may become a very important tree species for forestry, particularly in view of global climate change. Rising temperatures will result in vegetation shifts to higher altitudes and northern latitudes (Kremer 2007). Q. pedunculiflora is considered a keystone species for the forest ecosystems of the wood-steppe zone, the survival of many other plant and animal species depending on it (Donita et al. 2005). Its natural occurrence has been drastically reduced by land conversion to agriculture, human activities and poor forest management over the last centuries. At present, in some geographical areas (e.g. Northern Balkans) its distribution range is very fragmented and comprises only few isolated populations (Stanescu et al. 1997).

Due to its great ecological, economic and social importance, Q. robur has been intensively studied across Europe in the last two decades. There is a large body of literature on morphological and genetic variation, population differentiation and divergence of Q. robur from other closely related oak species (e.g. Fortini et al. 2009; Lepais et al. 2009; Viscosi et al. 2009). However, until present there is no genetic study which addresses the difference between the two sister species or very closely related taxa, Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora, or which investigates the genetic variation in Q. pedunculiflora, except for one test on half-sib progenies (Enescu 1993).

The purpose of this study is to characterise the differences in leaf morphology and to estimate the genetic differentiation between Q. robur and its closest relative, Q. pedunculiflora. More specifically, we were interested to find the most discriminating leaf variables between Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora and to examine using both nuclear and chloroplast markers whether these two ecologically divergent taxa have different genetic structures.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Plant material

Seven Q. robur and seven Q. pedunculiflora populations were sampled across the entire distribution range of the two taxa in Romania (Table 1). In addition, one mixed forest with both taxa, Letea Natural Reserve, was sampled in the Danube Delta. All populations are naturally regenerated and currently managed as gene reserves, with two exceptions (P-SNA and P-PUN—Table 1). Twigs with leaves and buds were collected during 2008 from approximately 50 adult trees per population. The trees were located at least 50 m apart from each other in order to avoid, as much as possible, the sampling of related individuals.

Table 1 Geographic location and climate conditions of the sampled Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora populations and of the mixed forest with both oak taxa

2.2 Morphological analysis

We focused on leaf descriptors because of the difficulty to obtain acorns and cupulas. The distance between two consecutive mast years can reach up to 10 years or more in both taxa. Three completely developed leaves collected from the part of the crown exposed to sunlight and from each of the 844 sampled individuals were analysed. A set of leaf morphological descriptors, which are commonly employed for oak species identification (Kremer et al. 2002), was used in this study. Leaf morphology was assessed by means of five dimensional variables (lamina length, petiole length, lobe width, sinus width and length of lamina at the largest width), two counted variables (number of lobes and number of intercalary veins); two observed variables (basal shape of the lamina and the abaxial laminar pubescence),which were scored as an index (Kremer et al. 2002) and five transformed characters (lamina shape, petiole ratio, lobe depth ratio, percentage venation and lobe width ratio). The dimensional descriptors were measured on leaf pictures with WinFOLIA software (Regent Instruments 2007). The basal shape of the lamina was scored from 1 to 9 and the pubescence density was ranked from 1 (no pubescence) to 6 (dense hairiness). The pubescence on the abaxial lamina was assessed with a stereomicroscope (×30). Mean values of each leaf descriptor per population and taxon as well as the P values for the comparisons (t test) between Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora were calculated using STATISTICA v8 software (StatSoft 2008). The data set for seven pure populations of Q. robur and seven pure populations of Q. pedunculiflora was used for the construction of a discriminant function using the same software. This function was then applied for classifying the trees sampled in the mixed forest from the Danube Delta as either Q. robur or Q. pedunculiflora.

2.3 Isozyme analysis

Enzymes were extracted from meristematic tissues after removing the bud scales. Separation of enzymes from crude homogenates was done by horizontal starch–gel electrophoresis following standard procedures (Müller-Starck et al. 1996; Zanetto et al. 1996). Seven enzyme systems were analysed (Enzyme Commission number and controlling locus are given in parenthesis): aspartate aminotransferase (2.6.1.1; Aat-B), isocitrate dehydrogenase (1.1.1.42, Idh-B), menadione-reductase (1.6.99.2; Mnr-A), 6-phosphogluconate-dehydrogenase (5.3.1.9; 6-Pgdh-B), phosphoglucose-isomerase (5.3.1.9; Pgi-B), phosphoglucomutase (2.7.5.1; Pgm-A) and shikimic acid dehydrogenase (1.1.1.25; Skdh-A). The seven enzyme-coding gene loci showed Mendelian inheritance in controlled crosses (Müller-Starck et al. 1996; Zanetto et al. 1996). Alleles were labelled in accordance with the relative migration rate of the corresponding band as related to the most common one. At every locus, 100 was assigned to the most frequent alleles.

2.4 Chloroplast DNA analysis

DNA was extracted from buds and leaves using the Qiagen DNeasy96 Plant Kit following the manufacturer protocol, but without using liquid nitrogen for disruption. The sample size for the chloroplast DNA analysis comprises five randomly selected trees per population. Four large regions of the chloroplast DNA were amplified, and each one was cut with restriction enzymes: psaA–trnS (AS) with HinfI, trnD–trnT (DT) with TaqI, trnC–trnD (CD) with TaqI and trnT–trnF (TF) with HinfI. The methods used are described in details elsewhere (Toader et al. 2009). The restriction fragments were then run on 8% polyacrylamide gels and stained with SYBR Gold (Molecular Probes). Nomenclature of the chloroplast haplotypes follows (Petit et al. 2002a). Chloroplast haplotypes, which did not fit exactly the restriction patterns, were named after the most similar ones and by adding prime (e.g. haplotype 15′).

2.5 Statistical data analysis

For each enzyme-coding gene locus and population, percentage of polymorphic loci, observed and effective number of alleles, number of private alleles (i.e. alleles found only in one taxon), allele frequencies, observed and expected heterozygosity, fixation index, divergence from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, Nei's genetic distances was calculated using the computer software GenAlEx version 6.3 (Peakall and Smouse 2006). An unweighted pair group method arithmetic average (UPGMA) dendrogram of the oak populations based on Nei's genetic distance, was constructed using MEGA version 4 (Tamura et al. 2007). A hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed using ARLEQUIN software version 3.5.1.2 (Excoffier et al. 2005). The significance of the F statistics was tested by permuting individuals between the populations. The number of permutations was set to 10,000. The frequency of the chloroplast DNA haplotypes and the population statistics for chloroplast data were calculated using the HAPLODIV software (Pons and Petit 1995).

3 Results

3.1 Leaf morphology

Only one out of five dimensional variables showed significant differences between Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora populations (Table 2). The petiole length was on average approximately 2 mm longer in Q. pedunculiflora. The morphological differences were more substantial at the observed variables. While Q. robur leaves show almost no trichomes on the abaxial surface of the leaf, Q. pedunculiflora leaves are densely pubescent (Table 2). Basal shape had smaller ear-like lobes (i.e. auricles) in Q. pedunculiflora populations. Two composed variable showed also significant differences (P < 0.05). One descriptor is petiole ratio, which is positively correlated with the petiole length. The second descriptor, lobe depth ratio, exhibited greater values in Q. pedunculiflora populations, which means that the leaves of this taxon have deeper sinuses compared to Q. robur.

Table 2 Mean and standard deviation values of 14 leaf descriptors in seven populations of Q. robur and seven populations of Q. pedunculiflora, respectively

The discriminant analysis, which was performed using the two groups of pure populations, showed that the pubescence on the abaxial surface of the leaf (PU) has the lowest value of Partial Wilks' Lambda (0.07), followed by petiole length, lobe width, basal shape and lamina shape, but with much higher values (0.98–099). The Partial Wilks' Lambda indicates that variable ‘pubescence’ contributes most to the overall discrimination. The first two discriminating variables were retained for the construction of the following discriminant function between Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora: ID = 686 − (228 × PU) − (5.8 × PL). This function gave positive values for Q. robur and negative values for Q. pedunculiflora (Fig. 1). Based on this discriminant function, the individuals sampled in the mixed oak forest from the Danube Delta were then classified as either Q. robur (47 samples) or Q. pedunculiflora (52 samples).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of the discriminant function values according to the oak taxon: Q. pedunculiflora (unshaded) and Q. robur (shaded)

3.2 Isozyme analysis

The seven enzyme-coding gene loci were polymorphic in all oak populations. A total of 41 alleles were observed in our sample (Table 3). The two oak taxa shared the common alleles at all loci but each harboured rare alleles (frequency ≤ 0.03) which were not found in the other taxon: four alleles in Q. robur and five alleles in Q. pedunculiflora. The private allele with the highest frequency, Pgi-B-129 (Table 3), was detected in all Q. robur pure populations. The other three Q. robur private alleles were observed in two up to five populations. Most of the alleles unique to Q. pedunculiflora were observed in two but not the same populations, only the private allele, Idh-B-82, occurred in one population (P-BAN).

Table 3 Mean allele frequencies at each enzyme-coding gene locus in Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora

The mean number of alleles per locus varied between 3.00 and 3.86 in Q. robur populations and between 2.86 and 3.86 in Q. pedunculiflora populations. When averaged across populations, this parameter was slightly higher in Q. robur than in Q. pedunculiflora (Table 4). The same trend was observed for the effective number of alleles (Ae). However, the mean value of observed heterozygosity (H o) was the same in both taxa. Only three out of the 56 tests for each taxon showed significant deviations (P < 0.05) from genotypic frequencies expected under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Q. robur as well as Q. pedunculiflora showed on average a very low heterozygote deficit, but this measure varied from one population to another (Table 4).

Table 4 Summary of genetic diversity over seven enzyme-coding gene loci for each population and taxon

The hierarchical AMOVA showed that most of the total genetic variation is within populations and only a small fraction (F ST = 0.039) is among the 16 populations (Table 5). The variation between taxa, averaged over all loci, was more than double in comparison to the variation among populations within taxa. The most discriminating enzyme-coding gene loci between taxa were Pgm-A and Idh-B (Table 5). Four other loci (6-Pgdh-B, Skdh-A, Mnr-A and Aat-B) differentiated better within populations of Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora, respectively, and not between the two taxa.

Table 5 Locus by locus and global AMOVA

The dendrogram constructed using Nei's genetic distances between pairs of populations revealed two clusters which comprise mostly populations of a single taxon (Fig. 2). Two Q. pedunculiflora populations situated in south-western Romania (P-PUN and P-BRC) were grouped together with other Q. robur populations from the same geographical region. One Q. pedunculiflora population (P-LT), situated in the Danube Delta, was grouped together with the single Q. pedunculiflora population (P-BAN) located between the Danube and the Black Sea (Fig. 2). The Q. robur population from the Danube Delta (R-LT) was included in one cluster with Q. pedunculiflora populations from the same geographical area, and not with the other Q. robur populations.

Fig. 2
figure 2

UPGMA cluster analysis using Nei's distances obtained from seven isozyme markers for 16 oak populations

3.3 Chloroplast DNA analysis

A total of eight chloroplast haplotypes were detected in the 16 oak populations. Most of the observed haplotypes belong to lineage A (Petit et al. 2002b) of the European oaks (haplotypes 4a, 4b′, 5a, 5c and 6), two haplotypes belong to lineage E (haplotype 13 and haplotype 15′) and one haplotype belong very likely to lineage F (haplotype 9′). Twelve out of the 16 oak populations were fixed for one or another haplotype (Fig. 3). The most common chloroplast haplotypes irrespective of taxon were haplotype 4a (frequency = 0.325) and haplotype 5a (frequency = 0.263). Three chloroplast haplotypes (haplotypes 4a, 5a and 9′) are shared by Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora (Fig. 3). Four chloroplast haplotypes were apparently specific for Q. robur (haplotype 6, 4b′, 5c and 15′) and one (haplotype 13) for Q. pedunculiflora. As expected, Q. robur, which covers a larger area in this study, has a higher level of total genetic diversity compared to Q. pedunculiflora, which is confined to south-eastern Romania (h T = 0.891 for Q. robur versus h T = 0.721 for Q. pedunculiflora). On the contrary, the coefficient of genetic differentiation, G ST, has a higher value in Q. pedunculiflora (G ST = 0.930 versus G ST = 0.761 for Q. robur), which shows the very low level of within population diversity, as it has been described for maternally inherited markers and measured in many tree species.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Geographical distribution of the chloroplast DNA haplotypes. The shadow area represents the Carpathian Mountains (elevation over 500 m)

4 Discussion

The morphological characterization of the pure populations of Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora showed that one leaf descriptor, abaxial laminar pubescence, contributes most to the differentiation between the two taxa. At the population level, three more leaf variables (petiole length, basal shape and lobe depth ratio) confirmed other minor leaf morphological differences described in the literature (Schwarz 1993; Stanescu et al. 1997). However, based solely on these last three leaf variables, one could not distinguish between individuals of Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora. In dendrological manuals (e.g. Stanescu et al. 1997), it is also mentioned a rare variety (var. virescens) of Q. pedunculiflora which exhibits a very low density of hairs on the abaxial surface of the leaf. However, this variety was not detected in our populations of Q. pedunculiflora, although we covered very well the actual natural occurrence of this taxon in Romania by including in this survey the most representative populations, the majority of them selected as forest genetic resources.

The high density of fasciculate hairs observed on the lower surface of Q. pedunculiflora leaves is undoubtedly an adaptation for survival on drier sites, which is also particular to Quercus pubescens. Other leaf morphological traits of Q. pedunculiflora also show similarities to Q. pubescens: longer petiole (8.33 ± 0.67) and deeper sinuses compared to Q. robur. These morphological similarities may support the hypothesis of introgression of genetic material from Q. pubescens, a species which has the petiole length ranging from 8 to 15 mm (20 mm), and in many instances deep sinuses (Bussotti 1998). The values of the discriminant function indicate a larger variance in Q. pedunculiflora than in Q. robur (see Fig. 1). This higher leaf morphological variation in Q. pedunculiflora may also represent an evidence of introgression from Q. pubescens, the only oak species that co-occurs with Q. pedunculiflora in the wood steppe of south-eastern Romania (Stanescu et al. 1997). Hybridization of Q. robur with other Quercus species, which show adaptations to drought, such as Q. pubescens, may have played a role in the formation of Q. pedunculiflora. Subsequent introgression following hybridization may be responsible for the transfer of few adaptations (e.g. pilosity) to Q. robur populations situated on the ecological margin of species distribution. Evidence for adaptive introgression between species has been reported in other plant species: sunflower and Louisiana Iris (see Arnold and Martin 2009 and references therein). For testing the hypothesis of introgressive hybridization, future investigations should include all oak species present in the region, which are potentially linked by gene flow. The importance of considering all species when studying hybridization was very well illustrated in a recent study on oak species in France (Lepais et al. 2009).

To our knowledge, this is the first investigation which aims at genetically differentiating the most widespread European white oak species, Q. robur, from Q. pedunculiflora, a less known taxon, which occurs in the wood steppe of south-eastern Europe. The presence of nine private alleles, most of them with very low frequency, may be mainly due to the small sample size for each population. However, the rare alleles are more susceptible to the loss through genetic drift than the more frequent ones (Nei and Chakraborty 1975). In case of private allele Pgi-B-129, which occurs in seven Q. robur populations, and shows frequencies ≥ 0.05 in three populations, it might be that there was not enough time to spread across Q. pedunculiflora populations since it appeared through a mutation. On average, Q. robur showed a higher allelic richness and gene diversity than Q. pedunculiflora, although the differences are not significant (P > 0.05). The greater fragmentation of natural distribution and smaller population size may lead to stronger effects of genetic drift in Q. pedunculiflora as compared to Q. robur.

The amount of nuclear differentiation between the two taxa (0.028) is slightly lower than the value estimated throughout Europe with the same category of genetic markers for the differentiation between Q. robur and Quercus petraea (Zanetto et al. 1994). However, the isozyme diversity between Q. robur and Q. petraea across regions in Central and Eastern Europe (0.020) was lower compared to our study when one outlier locus, Gludh-A, is excluded (Gömöry et al. 2001). Higher values for isozyme differentiation among Q. robur, Q. petraea and Q. pubescens are reported in a series of other studies (Finkeldey 2001; Belletti et al. 2005; Curtu et al. 2007). The values of Nei's distances estimated in our study are also lower than those reported in other isozyme studies on European oak species (Zanetto et al. 1994).

The level of genetic differentiation between Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora varied across the enzyme-coding gene loci. Two loci, Idh-B and Pgm-A, have better discriminated between taxa than among populations within taxa. Interestingly, isocitrate dehydrogenase (Idh) is one of the few enzyme systems at which selection effects have been detected (see Gömöry et al. 2010 and references therein). Moreover, Idh-B and Pgm-A loci showed high F ST values in a recent study within the white oak complex in Slovakia (Gömöry and Schmidtova 2007) or between Asian Quercus species (Potenko et al. 2007). Such markers that experience high levels of gene flows within species but little introgression (interspecific gene flow) are useful for species delimitation (Petit and Excoffier 2009).

If Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora were distinct species, then the populations should have clustered according to physical appearance rather than geographic location. However, unlike other studies (Zanetto et al. 1994; Muir et al. 2000; Potenko et al. 2007) not all the populations of the same taxon are grouped together. For instance, the samples of Q. robur from the Danube Delta are grouped together with two Q. pedunculiflora populations from the same geographical area rather than with other Q. robur populations. These results support the hypothesis that Q. pedunculiflora is an incipient species which has recently evolved under the dry conditions of the wood steppe in south-eastern Europe. The ecological specialisation of Q. robur populations to a more arid climate has conducted to the formation of a sister or minor species, Q. pedunculiflora, a taxon which exhibits several adaptations to drought such as hairiness on the abaxial surface of the leaf or thicker bark compared to Q. robur. As in other oak species, the gene flow between Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora, especially in areas of sympatry, like the mixed forest in the Danube Delta, is still very intense. Flowering phenology does not seem to represent a reproductive barrier between Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora since the two taxa flowered simultaneously in a mixed stand in Eastern Romania (Chesnoiu et al. 2009). Recent studies have found substantial gene flow during the process of speciation (Hey 2006). Ecological divergence in the presence of gene flow may be explained by the fact that natural selection can prevent gene flow at some genes (e.g. the genes responsible for adaptation to dry conditions) and it can enable other genes to pass between populations (Hey 2006).

The two taxa share the most frequent chloroplast haplotypes, but also one rare haplotype of presumably Caucasian origin, which was observed for the first time in the Danube Delta. The sharing of both common and rare chloroplast haplotypes supports also the existence of gene flow between oak species in the recent past (Lexer et al. 2006). Haplotype 13, which in our study seems to be present only in one Q. pedunculiflora population from south-western Romania, was previously reported in Q. robur populations from central Romania (Bordács et al. 2002). So, there are no specific haplotypes for Q. pedunculiflora, all of them being detected in Q. robur either in this study or in previous surveys on material from the same regions (Bordács et al. 2002). On the other hand, haplotype 6, which was observed only in one Q. robur population in north-western Romania, is very common in the Carpathian Basin, where no Q. pedunculiflora trees are mentioned to occur, at least in Romania. The haplotypes detected in this study match very well those previously found in the northern Balkans and are likely to have migrated from the Balkan and Italian Peninsulas, but also from the eastern part of the Black Sea (Petit et al. 2002a).

The very low level of nuclear differentiation revealed by the isozyme markers as well as the lack of differentiation at the chloroplast DNA level between Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora might be explained by ongoing or recent divergence of the two taxa. Even though Q. robur and Q. pedunculiflora exhibit different morphology and ecological preferences, the genetic differences between them are quite small and are very probably restricted to a few genomic regions under selection. Whether the formation of Q. pedunculiflora is mainly due to the direct adaptation of Q. robur to drier habitats or to introgressive hybridization with other xerophilous oak species (e.g. Q. pubescens) remains to be tested. Future research should use more marker loci distributed throughout the whole oak genome and/or adaptive markers, which will hopefully be soon available, to detect possible ‘genomic islands’ of incipient speciation.

References

  • Arnold M, Martin N (2009) Adaptation by introgression. J Biol 8:82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belletti P, Leonardi S et al (2005) Allozyme variation in different species of deciduous oaks from northwestern Italy. Silvae Genetica 54:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordács S, Popescu F et al (2002) Chloroplast DNA variation of white oaks in the northern Balkans and in the Carpathian Basin. For Ecol Manage 156:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broshtilov K (2006) Quercus robur L. leaf variability in Bulgaria. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 147:64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussotti F (1998) Q. pubescens Willd. In: Schütt P, Schuck HJ, Lang UM and Roloff A (Eds), Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse: Handbuch und Atlas der Dendrologie, Ecomed, Landsberg am Lech, pp 1–10

  • Chesnoiu EN, Sofletea N et al (2009) Bud burst and flowering phenology in a mixed oak forest from Eastern Romania. Ann For Res 52:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciocarlan V (2000) Flora ilustrata a Romaniei. Editura Ceres, Bucuresti, 1139 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtu AL, Gailing O et al (2007) Genetic variation and differentiation within a natural community of five oak species (Quercus spp). Plant Biology 9:116–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz K (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst Biol 56:879–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donita N, Geambasu T et al (2004) Dendrologie. Editura Vasile Goldis, Arad, 423 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Donita N, Popescu A et al (2005) Habitatele din Romania. Editura Tehnica Silvica, Bucuresti, 496 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Enescu V (1993) A test of half-sib progenies of greyisch oak. Quercus pedunculiflora K Koch. Ann Sci For 50:439–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G et al (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinforma Online 1:47–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finkeldey R (2001) Genetic variation of oaks (Quercus spp.) in Switzerland. 1. Allelic diversity and differentiation at isozyme gene loci. For Genet 8:185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortini P, Viscosi V et al (2009) Comparative leaf surface morphology and molecular data of five oaks of the subgenus Quercus Oerst (Fagaceae). Plant Biosyst 143:543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu CC, Cretzoiu P (1941) Consideratiuni sistematice asupra speciei Quercus pedunculiflora K Koch. in Romania. Analele ICAS 7:3–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu CC, Morariu J (1948) Monografia stejarilor din România. Universul, Bucuresti, 26 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gömöry D, Schmidtova J (2007) Extent of nuclear genome sharing among white oak species (Quercus L. subgen. Lepidobalanus (Endl.) Oerst.) in Slovakia estimated by allozymes. Plant Syst Evol 266:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gömöry D, Yakovlev I et al (2001) Genetic differentiation of oak populations within the Quercus robur/Quercus petraea complex in Central and Eastern Europe. Heredity 86:557–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gömöry D, Longauer R et al (2010) Across-species patterns of genetic variation in forest trees of Central Europe. Biodivers Conserv 19:2025–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey J (2006) Recent advances in assessing gene flow between diverging populations and species. Curr Opin in Genet & Development Genomes and evolution 16:592–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer A (2007) How well can existing forests withstand climate change. In: Koskela J, Buck A, Teissier du Cros E (eds) Climate change and forest genetic diversity: implications for sustainable forest management in Europe. Bioversity International, Rome, pp 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer A, Dupouey JL et al (2002) Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Ann For Sci 59:777–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepais O, Petit RJ et al (2009) Species relative abundance and direction of introgression in oaks. Mol Ecol 18:2228–2242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lexer C, Kremer A et al (2006) Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism. Mol Ecol 15:2007–2012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menitsky YL (2005) Oaks of Asia, Science Publishers, p 549

  • Muir G, Fleming CC et al (2000) Species status of hybridizing oaks. Nature 405:1016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Starck G, Zanetto A et al (1996) Inheritance of isoenzymes in sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and offspring from interspecific crosses. For Genet 3:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit RJ, Excoffier L (2009) Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24:386–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petit R, Brewer S et al (2002a) Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonisation routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. For Ecol Manage 156:49–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit R, Csaikl U et al (2002b) Chloroplast DNA variation in European white oaks. Phylogeography and patterns of diversity based on data from over 2600 populations. For Ecol Manage 156:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons O, Petit RJ (1995) Estimation, variance and optimal sampling of gene diversity. I. Haploid locus. Theor Appl Genet 90:462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potenko V, Koren O et al (2007) Genetic variation and differentiation in populations of Japanese emperor oak Quercus dentata Thunb. and Mongolian oak Quercus mongolica Fisch. ex Ledeb. in the south of the Russian Far East. Russ J Genet 43:387–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regent Instruments I (2007) WinFOLIA: Image analysis systems and software, Regent Instruments Inc

  • Rushton BS (1993) Natural hybridization within the genus Quercus. Ann Sci For 50:73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz O (1937) Monographie der Eichen Europas und des Mittelmeergebietes I. Textband, Dahlem, Berlin, 200 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz O (1993) Quercus L. In: Tutin TG, Burges NA, Chater AO (eds) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 72–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanescu V, Sofletea N et al (1997) Flora forestiera lemnoasa a Romaniei. Editura Ceres, Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft (2008) STATISTICA for Windows [Software-System For Data Analysis]

  • Tamura K, Dudley J et al (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toader A, Moldovan IC et al (2009) DNA isolation and amplification in oak species (Quercus spp.). Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov 2 Series II: 45–50

  • Turner TL, Hahn MW (2007) Locus- and population-specific selection and differentiation between incipient species of Anopheles gambiae. Mol Biol Evol 24:2132–2138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viscosi V, Lepais O et al (2009) Leaf morphological analyses in four European oak species Quercus and their hybrids: A comparison of traditional and geometric morphometric methods. Plant Biosystems 143:564–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanetto A, Roussel G et al (1994) Geographic variation of inter-specific differentiation between Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. For Genet 1:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanetto A, Kremer A et al (1996) Inheritance of isozymes in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). J Hered 87:364–370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to numerous colleagues from the forest districts across the country for assisting us during the field sampling. We are grateful to Ecaterina Chesnoiu and Andras Tothpal for field assistance and help in the leaf measurements and Tudor Stancioiu for his suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript. We wish to also thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by CNCSIS–UEFISCSU, project number PNII-IDEI 183/2007. Mihai Cristian Enescu acknowledges a PhD scholarship (POSDRU/88/1.5/S/59321) financed by ESF and the Romanian Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandru Lucian Curtu.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Luc Paques

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curtu, A.L., Sofletea, N., Toader, A.V. et al. Leaf morphological and genetic differentiation between Quercus robur L. and its closest relative, the drought-tolerant Quercus pedunculiflora K. Koch. Annals of Forest Science 68, 1163–1172 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0105-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0105-z

Keywords