Skip to main content

Geographic variation of tree height of three pine species (Pinus nigra Arn., P. pinaster Aiton, and P. pinea L.) gathered from common gardens in Europe and North-Africa

Abstract

Key message

This datapaper collects individual georeferenced tree height data from Pinus nigra Arn., P. pinaster Aiton, and P. pinea L. planted in common gardens in France, Germany, Morocco, and Spain. The data can be used to assess genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity with further applications in biogeography and forest management. The three datasets are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3250704 (Vizcaíno-Palomar et al. 2018a), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3250698 (Vizcaíno-Palomar et al. 2018b), and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3250707 (Vizcaíno-Palomar et al. 2018c), and the associated metadata are available at https://metadata-afs.nancy.inra.fr/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/644682d3-78c6-4fcc-af26-b1a928be7b1b , https://metadata-afs.nancy.inra.fr/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/535b8ad0-9315-4d78-80bd-d0f6cbb9d0ce and https://metadata-afs.nancy.inra.fr/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/4cc0d2f0-00a9-42c8-aa34-fbbc647e3eb9 for P. nigra, P. pinaster and P. pinea, respectively.

Background

Understanding how tree species and populations will perform under future climatic conditions has become essential for sustainable forest management. Plastic responses and genetic variation are two of the processes that can generate phenotypic variation within species, and thus help populations to cope with climate change (Bolnick et al. 2011; Alberto et al. 2013; Benito Garzón et al. 2019). In forest trees, genetic diversity is generally involved in long-term adaptive responses while plasticity entails shorter responses to acclimatize (Franks and Hoffmann 2012; Chevin et al. 2013).

Pines are keystone species in many Mediterranean and European ecosystems and are often used for ecological restoration and in multi-purpose plantations. Their evolutionary history, ecology, and the ecosystem services they provide are well-known (Tapias et al. 2004; Ruiz-Benito et al. 2012; Fady 2012). However, understanding their fine-scale local adaptation patterns and how phenotypes and genotypes are associated remain a scientific challenge.

Rather recently, common garden experiments established with the aim of selecting the best forest reproductive material and to provide resources for breeding programs have been rediscovered and now reanalyzed as climate change experimental designs, see for example, Rehfeldt et al. (2002), Benito Garzón et al. (2011), O’Neill and Nigh (2011), Benito Garzón and Fernández-Manjarrés (2015) and Vizcaíno-Palomar et al. (2016). Common gardens provide highly valuable information for disentangling the genetic component of phenotypic trait variability, for detecting evidence of local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity. Because of this legitimate renewed interest, great efforts are currently made to digitize, harmonize, and compile datasets obtained from common gardens beyond the national scale (e.g., Robson et al. 2018).

Methods

In this datapaper, we gather individual and georeferenced phenotypic variation data of tree height from three pine species of high importance for Mediterranean and European forestry and habitat management: Pinus nigra Arn., P. pinaster Aiton, and P. pinea L. Tree height data have been generated in common gardens distributed across the species ranges where different genetic units have been grown. The genetic units included in these datasets are wild type resources whose names are those of the locality where they were collected from. In some cases, they correspond to identified seed stands and are listed in country databases as forest reproductive material. When appropriate, they can be found in the European Union FOREMATIS information system http://ec.europa.eu/forematis/.

Specifically, we compiled data from 15 P. nigra common gardens located in France, Germany, and Spain and planted between years 1968 and 2009. The experimental design varies depending on the common garden, from a randomized complete block design (RCB) to a randomized incomplete block design, RIB, see Table 1. Likewise, the number of blocks varies from 1 to 70, and in the case of the German common gardens, blocks have been called X, Y, and Z. The total number of genetic units (here provenances) tested varies from 2 to 48 (Table 1). In P. pinaster, the data were compiled from 14 common gardens located in France, Morocco, and Spain, planted between 1966 and 1992 (Table 1). In this specific species, the data have been compiled from both provenance and progeny tests. Specifically, Pavillon and Malgaches are provenances tests, while Saint Alban, Le Bray, and La Mole are progeny-provenance tests. The experimental design depends on the common garden, being RCB or RIB; the number of blocks varies from 4 to 127 and the number of genetic units from 10 to 467. For the data collected from the progeny tests, we only gathered the data derived from crosses between parents from the same geographic origin. Finally, in P. pinea, the data were compiled from 9 common gardens located in France and Spain, and planted between 1993 and 1997 (Table 1). The experimental design was RIB with 43 to 171 blocks, except in one site with 15 RCB. The number of tested genetic units (here provenances) tested varies from 26 to 38.

Table 1 Summary information of the common gardens of each pine species. The number of genetic units makes reference to the original number established in the common garden, i.e., not accounting for catastrophic events which could have depleted one or some of the genetic units

Tree height data were measured on site with a telescopic ruler with a centimeter precision, see https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/ephesis/ephesis/ontologyportal.do and specify CO_357:1000037 in the search button (Steinbach et al. 2013), and depending on the common garden, tree height was recorded at different tree ages. These data were always collected block by block to minimize temporal variance.

The raw data collected in the common gardens were compiled into three datasets, one for each species. The same process to generate a clean and ready dataset was repeated for each one of them. Firstly, as tree height measurements were taken in different years, we created a new variable called “Age” by subtracting the Year when the measurement was taken to the Year when the common garden was installed. This variable measures the number of years an individual tree has been growing in the common garden. Secondly, we created a code for each tree measured in a common garden. This code allows us for tracking each individual tree height over years and it is useful to assess individual tree variation. Thirdly, the geographic origin of the different genetic units (either originated in provenance tests or in progeny tests) and common gardens were georeferenced. Finally, we filtered and cleaned the dataset by eliminating negative and/or missing tree height values.

The final dimensions of each dataset were of 194,642 individual tree height data measurements for P. nigra with 15 common gardens and 78 different provenances, 123,801 individual tree height data measurements for P. pinaster with 14 common gardens and 182 different genetic units, and 56,624 individual tree height measurements for P. pinea with 9 common gardens and 55 different provenances. Figure 1 shows for each pine species the genetic units tested and the sites where the common gardens were established. We used the R version 3.2.3 (2015-12-10) run in linux-gnu operating system for data and file quality check and compilation. We employed basic functions, e.g., merge, rbind, spTransform, to build the datasets.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The three networks of common gardens are represented in a separate map. Red triangles represent common gardens, light-blue circles represent genetic units, and yellow areas represent the natural distribution of the species according to EUFORGEN source (http://www.euforgen.org/). Top left Pinus nigra, top right Pinus pinaster, bottom left Pinus pinea

Access to data and metadata description

The three datasets are available on ZENODO, please always refer to the latest version, at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3250704 (Vizcaíno-Palomar et al. 2018a), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3250698 (Vizcaíno-Palomar et al. 2018b), and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3250707 (Vizcaíno-Palomar et al. 2018c) for P. nigra, P. pinaster, and P. pinea, respectively.

The data records are described in the metadata description files.

The associated metadata are available at https://metadata-afs.nancy.inra.fr/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/644682d3-78c6-4fcc-af26-b1a928be7b1b, https://metadata-afs.nancy.inra.fr/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/535b8ad0-9315-4d78-80bd-d0f6cbb9d0ce and https://metadata-afs.nancy.inra.fr/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/4cc0d2f0-00a9-42c8-aa34-fbbc647e3eb9 for P. nigra, P. pinaster and P. pinea, respectively.

Technical validation

Data acquisition in the field followed strict, high-quality standards, such as block-by-block measurement paths to minimize environmental and temporal variance, and the use of prefilled data loggers (when it was possible) to match previous measurements with the current status of each tree. Back-to-the-lab, quality checks such as computing minimum and maximum values, visualizing data distribution histograms, and checking differences between current and previous values were systematically used and aberrant values were removed. Part of these data have already been used successfully in previous studies (Alía et al. 1995; Harfouche et al. 1995; Climent et al. 2008; Šeho et al. 2010; Mutke et al. 2010, 2013; Benito Garzón et al. 2011; Huber and Šeho 2016; Vizcaíno-Palomar et al. 2016).

Reuse potential and limits

The reuse of the data presented here is simple. The data files are encoded in UTF-8; hence, potential users just need to load the data and indicate this encode. For example, R users just need to add encoding = “UTF-8” in the function used for reading the file. If users open the file in Excel, they need to indicate the source of the data which is the UTF-8. Once the data is loaded, it is ready to be analyzed; users do not need to combine or merge any other files. Users will find that each row contains individual tree height data, defined by a set of variables (a total of 19) such as the name and the geographical position of the common garden —either provenance or progeny test— (Site_name, Long_S, Lat_S) and the name of the genetic unit and the geographical position (Prov_name, Long_P, Lat_P), year of plantation, age, etc. For further information, users can check the metadata description files. Differences among genetic units and sites should be only interpreted in the environmental context of the test sites from where the data were gathered.

Datapapers gathering common gardens (such as provenance tests) are starting to appear due to their relevance to help assess the ability of forests to deal with climate change, see for example, the recent datapaper on European beech common garden networks (Robson et al. 2018). Here, we present for the first time a datapaper collecting tree height from an extensive network of common gardens within and across countries and for three Mediterranean pine species covering European and African distribution ranges. Actually, these are powerful datasets enhancing to assess plastic responses in large climatic gradients, which is of high relevance within the climate change context; for further analysis on modeling, species ranges based on their phenotypic variation and applications for forest management as for example assisted migration programs.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

France: We acknowledge the invaluable help of F. Rei (INRA UEFM, Avignon, France), N. Cheval, C. Magnin, L. Moras, N. Morrisson, L. Puzos, and L. Severin (INRA UEFP, Bordeaux, France), F. Bonne, T. Paul, and V. Rousselet (INRA UEFL, Nancy, France) for data collection in French common gardens. These pine species are some of the many forest tree species managed at INRA in the GEN4X network of common gardens (see http://www.efpa.inra.fr/Outils-et-Ressources/Systemes-d-experimentation-et-d-observation/Reseau-GEN4X). Likewise, we acknowledge the invaluable help of the Unité Expérimentale Forêt Pierroton, UEFP, which produced the material and planted, managed, and measured the trials of P. pinaster located in France.

Germany: We acknowledge the help of Andreas Zaiser and Christoph Sommer (Bavarian Office for Seeding and Planting) for data collection in Germany.

Morocco: We gratefully acknowledge the forest tree genetic improvement team for their assistance and dedicated involvement in every step throughout the P. pinaster field trials process.

Spain: We acknowledge the GENFORED team; they took field measurements, keep updated and cleaned the databases, and make possible to keep alive a great network of common gardens of different tree species. Similarly, to Javier Gordo (Junta de Castilla y León), Aránzazu Prada (Generalitat Valenciana), and Salustiano Iglesias (MAPAMA) for data collection in P. pinea common gardens.

Funding

We acknowledge the funding called Investments for the future: Programme IdEx Bordeaux (France), reference ANR-10-IDEX-03-02, thanks to that MBG coordinated this datapaper and NVP worked on it. Identically, we acknowledge funding from the French Ministry of Agriculture in charge of forests and its regional bureau in Montpellier, the ANR project AMTools (ANR-11-AGRO-0005), and the Aix-Marseille Université (as part of GG’s PhD thesis) for the French data. In the same way, we acknowledge the support from the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fishery and Environment (MAPAMA) and the regional governments of Junta de Castilla y León and Generalitat Valenciana through agreements with Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM). Likewise, we acknowledge funding from the Bavarian State Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Forestry (StMELF) for the German data. The creation of the network of P. pinea common gardens was made possible by the support given from FAO Silva Mediterranea (http://www.fao.org/forestry/silva-mediterranea/en/). INRA funded the creation and maintenance of the French experimental network of common gardens (GEN4X), as well as the development and implementation of the information system archiving its data, GnpIS (https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Tools/GnpIS). P. pinea data collected in the future will be archived on GnpIS at: https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/ephesis/ephesis/viewer.do#dataResults). INIA funded the Spanish network by successive projects OT03-002, AT2010-007, AT2013-004, and RTA2013-00011. Finally, this publication is part of a project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programmer under grant agreement no. 676876 (GenTree).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NVP compiled, cleaned, and checked the data from the three pine species and wrote the manuscript. MBG coordinated data acquisition from the three pine species and wrote the manuscript. RA coordinated the study designs and collected the data of P. nigra and P. pinaster in Spain. GG collected and compiled the data of P. nigra in France. GH and MS coordinated the study design of P. nigra in Germany and collected the data. SM collaborated in the study design of P. pinea in Spain, collected and checked the data. PP coordinated the study design of P. pinaster in France and collected the data. AR is in charge of data gathering, checking, and archiving the common gardens of P. pinaster in France. HS coordinated the study design of P. pinaster in Morocco and collected the data. DV collected data of P. pinea common gardens and took care of metadata and data curation for this species. BF coordinated the study design of P. pinea in France and collected the data. Likewise, BF coordinated data acquisition from the three pine species and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to, and approved, the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Vizcaíno-Palomar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Marianne Peiffer

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection on Mediterranean pines

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vizcaíno-Palomar, N., Garzón, M.B., Alia, R. et al. Geographic variation of tree height of three pine species (Pinus nigra Arn., P. pinaster Aiton, and P. pinea L.) gathered from common gardens in Europe and North-Africa. Annals of Forest Science 76, 77 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0867-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0867-2

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Assisted migration
  • Genetic variation
  • Niche breadth
  • Phenotypic plasticity
  • Tree height