Skip to main content

The effects of provenance, climate, and chemical defense on the resistance of Pinus pinaster Aiton to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer)

Abstract

Key message

The resistance of Pinus pinaster Aiton to pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer) varied among populations from the Iberian Peninsula, with survival rates for inoculated seedlings ranging from 5 to 100%. These differences in resistance were paralleled by differences in some constitutive chemical defenses. Populations from the southeastern Iberian Peninsula displayed higher resistance than northern populations.

Context

The presence of the pinewood nematode (PWN), Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer), in Portugal threatens Mediterranean pine species such as Pinus pinaster Aiton.

Aims

We have focused on assessing the resistance of P. pinaster populations to B. xylophilus, looking for any relationship between the PWN resistance and some constitutive chemical defenses and geoclimatic parameters.

Methods

Two-year-old seedlings from 32 provenances and two seed orchards were evaluated in an experiment of artificial inoculation following a randomized complete block design under greenhouse conditions. We measured growth-related traits, response to B. xylophilus inoculations, and constitutive chemical compounds in needles of the evaluated seedlings and compiled geoclimatic data for each population. Mixed models, nonparametric tests, correlations, and PCA were used to analyze the data.

Results

Survival, wilting symptoms, morphological traits, and nematode density varied significantly among populations. Lower concentrations of constitutive polyphenols, lipid-soluble substances, and tannins were related to higher PWN resistance. Populations from the southeast of the Iberian Peninsula showed higher survival rates than those from further north. Additionally, we observed that populations to warm, dry climates showed higher resistance to B. xylophilus than populations originating from humid, temperate climates.

Conclusion

Higher susceptibility to PWN is related to lower growth traits, to lower levels of certain constitutive chemical compounds, and to adaptations to harsher climate.

1 Introduction

Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer) Nickle, the pinewood nematode (PWN), is the agent of pine wilt disease (PWD), a severe disease outside the native region of this North American nematode. It can kill trees in a few weeks or months. The main tree hosts of this pathogen are conifer trees of the genus Pinus. Under natural conditions, they are infected through pine sawyer beetles belonging to the genus Monochamus, which are vectors of this pathogen (Linit 1988).

The first PWD outbreak was detected in Japan at the beginning of the twentieth century. Since then, the disease has spread through Asian countries, and in 1999, it was detected for the first time in Europe, specifically in the Setubal Peninsula, Portugal (Mota et al. 1999). Later, in 2008, the whole Portuguese territory was considered as demarcated zone (Mota et al. 2009), and since then, several outbreaks have been reported in Spain, some of which still remain active (Junta de Castilla y León 2019; Xunta de Galicia 2019). This situation constitutes a potential threat to the health of European coniferous forests (Evans et al. 1996; Vicente et al. 2012). Recently, several studies have predicted the expansion of the disease from Portugal through Central Spain and into Europe within the next few years (De la Fuente et al. 2018) and the establishment of PWD in Spain (De la Fuente and Saura 2021). The estimated economic losses in Spain due to PWD could reach nearly 12 billion euros for the 2008 to 2030 period if no control measures are efficiently deployed (Soliman et al. 2012).

The present work focuses on P. pinaster, which has a circum-Mediterranean distribution area, with fragmented populations spread throughout the Atlantic coast of eastern France, Portugal, and the Mediterranean Basin. Over a third of the forests in Spain are coniferous, and the ample distribution of P. pinaster (about 1.4 million hectares, considering both natural and planted forests) makes it an important species for the ecology and economy of the country. Indeed, it is one of the main timber species, amounting to 14.3% of the timber volume of Spanish forests (Bravo et al. 2017). In this country, all-natural P. pinaster forests have been classified into 28 provenances according to differences in genetic, phenotypic, and ecological patterns (Alía et al. 1997, 2009). In addition, based on a gene pool study, different geographic areas were defined for P. pinaster populations: French, northwest Iberian Peninsula, central and southeast Iberian Peninsula, Italian, and Moroccan groups (Jaramillo-Correa et al. 2015). This differentiation can reflect genetic selection due to diverse climates and environmental conditions (González-Martínez et al. 2002; Lamy et al. 2012, 2011).

Genetic breeding for resistance is one way to manage the impact of PWD. Several breeding programs against B. xylophilus reported successful results for different pine species. Japan developed the first breeding programs for Pinus thunbergii Parl. and Pinus densiflora Sieb. and Zucc. in 1978. Today, the resistant clones obtained from these programs are being used for reforestation in this country (Matsunaga et al. 2016; Kurinobu 2008; Nose and Shiraishi 2008). However, in Europe, breeding programs have been focused on improving traits of economic interest so far. The French breeding program for P. pinaster aimed at improved growth and stem forms (Bouffier et al. 2008). Alike, the Galician breeding program for this species was initially developed based on growth traits and stem form (Zas and Merlo 2008). Recently, the selection based on resistance has been evaluated since the potential for breeding PWN-resistant pines was confirmed for P. pinaster families of the Galician breeding program (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2018). In addition, genetic variation in PWN susceptibility has also been demonstrated for other species, such as Pinus radiata Don (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2021).

Growth traits are often a selection criterion in breeding programs. However, the pine trees selected for better growth traits do not have to be necessarily resistant to PWN. For example, Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. (2018) reported a positive correlation between the growth traits and susceptibility to PWN. Conversely, Carrasquinho et al. (2018) reported a negative relationship between these traits. Other studies have found a positive relation between the number of branches and survival (Hakamata et al. 2013; Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017b, 2018).

According to Morgenstern (1996), geographic variation in forest species can lead to genetic variation patterns as a consequence of natural selection and other genetic processes. The host response to a disease may vary in populations with different provenances, as was reported for Pinus halepensis Mill. provenances against Gremmeniella abietina (Lagerb.) Morelet (Romeralo et al. 2016) and P. pinaster provenances against PWN (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017b). In particular, Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. (2017b) reported that susceptibility among P. pinaster provenances could be positively related to autumn precipitation and mean maximum temperature during summer at the original provenance sites.

Several authors have reported that constitutive chemical compounds may play a major part in defense against PWN (Linit 1988; Stamps and Linit 1998; Rodrigues et al. 2017). At species level, PWN-resistant species showed higher levels of polyphenolic compounds in the phloem (Pimentel et al. 2017a, b) and xylem (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017a). In contrast, at provenance level, P. pinaster provenances with higher polyphenolic concentrations in excised branch segments proved to be more susceptible to PWN (Zas et al. 2015). Recently, at family level, Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. (2021) found higher levels of condensed tannins and soluble carbohydrates in needles from resistant P. radiata families to PWN. In addition, it is known that nutrients also regulate metabolic activity associated with susceptibility against diseases and pathogens (Datnoff et al. 2007). Previous studies determined that resistant species such as P. halepensis showed higher constitutive content of nitrogen than susceptible species such as P. radiata or Pinus sylvestris. In contrast, susceptible species showed higher constitutive content of lipid-soluble substances than resistant species (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017a, 2021).

In this study, the main objective was to assess the susceptibility of a wide range of P. pinaster populations against PWN. To achieve this, we tested seedlings from thirty-two provenances and two seed orchards (one in Galicia, one in France) to the following: (1) identify the variation among P. pinaster populations in susceptibility to PWN, (2) explore the relationship between constitutive chemical compounds present in needles and PWN resistance, and (3) determine if there is a geoclimatic cline for susceptibility to PWN.

2 Material and methods

2.1 Plant material and experimental design

Two-year-old P. pinaster seedlings from thirty-four populations were evaluated in an inoculation experiment in June 2020. Populations originated from 32 natural stands each from one provenance region. In addition, two seed orchards with two breeding populations were used, HSC26001 in Galicia and HSFRVG006 in France (Table 1). We arranged these populations into six geographic groups based on different gene pools defined by Jaramillo-Correa et al. (2015) through the study of molecular markers related to climate adaptation (Table 1).

Table 1 Pinus pinaster populations evaluated for resistance to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, along with associated geoclimatic data

The experiment was performed under controlled conditions at the Lourizán Forest Research Center (42° 24′ 33″ N, 8° 39′ 46″ W, Pontevedra, Spain). The seedlings were grown in 2-l plastic pots in nursery beds using a mixture of peat moss and vermiculite (9:1v/v) as substrate. The seedlings had a mean height of 100.8 cm at the moment of PWN inoculation. The experiment followed a randomized complete block design with 20 blocks and one tree plot. In five of these blocks, a second seedling of each population was established as control. Twenty seedlings per population were inoculated with Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Bührer) and five with distilled water (controls). The duration of this experiment was 133 DAI (days after inoculation). Temperature ranged between 16 and 32 °C, with a mean temperature of 18.7 °C. Watering by drip irrigation occurred on a weekly basis during the assay.

2.2 Pinewood nematode culture and inoculation procedure

A total of 678 seedlings were inoculated with a local isolate of B. xylophilus obtained from As Neves (Pontevedra, Spain) in 2010. Nematodes were cultured on non-sporulating Botrytis cinerea Pers. growing on PDA medium at 25 °C. The inoculum was prepared by extracting nematodes using a modified Baermann funnel technique and adjusting the concentration to 4000 nematodes per milliliter in distilled water. A cut was made in the previous year’s growth on the stem of all seedlings. Then, a 1-cm-wide strip of gauze was put around the wound, and 300 µl of inoculum was pipetted into the xylem. The gauze was covered by parafilm to prevent the risk of unsuccessful inoculation. Each seedling was inoculated with an average of 1200 nematodes at mixed developmental stages. Control seedlings were inoculated with 300 µl of distilled water using the same method.

2.3 Morphological traits

Prior to inoculation, the following morphological traits were measured: total initial height (H, in cm), height increment from the previous year’s growth to the inoculation date (ΔH, in cm), and total number of branches (NB, in number) at the inoculation date.

2.4 Disease development and survival

Wilting symptoms (W) were assessed twice a week until the end of the assay, which occurred when there was no further progress in symptoms. We used a seven-level scale corresponding to the percentage of affected needles from 1 (no external symptoms) to 7 (all needles brown and wilted) (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2018).

Survival and disease development variables were estimated from the wilting symptoms. Survival (S) was assessed as binary: seedlings with wilting symptoms in levels 1 to 5 were considered alive (1), whereas those in levels 6 or 7 were considered dead (0). Disease development was studied using three variables in populations that had at least five dead seedlings before the end of the experiment. The start of wilting symptoms (SWd) for each seedling was established as the day after inoculation (DAI) when wilting symptoms reached level 3. The DAI on which wilting symptoms reached level 6 was considered the end of wilting symptoms (EWd) for the seedling. The duration of wilting symptoms (DWd) was defined as the difference in days between the start and the end of wilting symptoms.

2.5 Quantification of nematode density

All seedlings from six of the 20 blocks randomly selected were harvested to quantify the nematode density. Every seedling from the selected blocks that reached level 7 was harvested immediately, and their nematode populations were extracted by a modified Baermann funnel method (Schröder et al. 2009). At the end of the experiment, all seedlings from these blocks that were still alive were harvested. In total, 203 seedlings were harvested and divided into the following: roots and stems. The nematodes were extracted and counted using a stereomicroscope (Olympus Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Dry weight (105 °C, 48 h) was determined, and nematode density (per gram of dry weight) was estimated for stem (NDs), roots (NDr), and total seedling (NDt).

2.6 Chemical compounds

Prior to inoculation, needle samples from every seedling of 12 blocks randomly selected were collected and immediately frozen at −20 °C. Some months later, after the end of the experiment, survival data was analyzed, and the 5 most and 5 least susceptible populations were selected for the chemical compound analysis. Then, the 12 needle samples from each population were arranged into four major samples, each one composed by samples coming from three blocks of the inoculation experiment. All frozen needles from these ten populations were cleaned with distilled water, cut into small parts, lyophilized for 72 h, and crushed into a homogeneous powder.

Based on previous works (Datnoff et al. 2007; Zas et al. 2015; Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017a, 2021; Pimentel et al. 2017a), the following chemical compounds were selected to be quantified: nitrogen (N; %), lipid-soluble substances (Lip; mg·g−1 of dry tissue), total polyphenols (Pol; mg·g−1 of dry tissue), condensed tannins (Tan; mg·g−1 of dry tissue), soluble monosaccharides (Mon; mg·g−1 of dry tissue), and starch (Sta; mg·g−1 of dry tissue).

Nitrogen was analyzed using the Kjeldahl method as in Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. (2018). Liposoluble substances were identified through gravimetry, with petroleum ether as the specific solvent, which was removed from the sample with a rotary vacuum evaporator (Heidolph Instruments GMbH and Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany). From the defatted sample, condensed tannins and total polyphenols were extracted by refluxing in Soxhlet, with methanol-water (50:50 v/v) for 5 min. KHSO3 was added to prevent oxidation of phenolic compounds during extraction, and methanol was removed by a rotary vacuum evaporator (Heidolph Instruments GMbH and Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany). Condensed tannins were determined colorimetrically with H2SO4/vanillin reagent (Scalbert et al. 1989), and a Perkin Elmer Lambda 35 UV-Vis spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) was used to measure the samples at 500 nm. Folin-Ciocalteu reagent was used to determine total polyphenols, and the samples were measured at 750 nm with the spectrophotometer. The results were expressed as milligram of catechin equivalent per gram of dry tissue (mg/g). To prevent other substances from interfering, the substances/isolates were measured with and without polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (Domínguez 1987). The soluble monosaccharides were extracted in ULTRA-TURRAX (EtOH dilution (80%) and distilled water (20 percent) and then centrifuged. The ethanol and soluble carbohydrates were removed using the Dubois method (rotary evaporator), and the extracts were analyzed as glucose. The same method was applied to analyze starch. All analyses were hydrolyzed with H2SO4 5N[MM3] [TSE4] [MM5] and analyzed colorimetrically as soluble carbohydrates. The results were expressed in mg glucose g-1 lyophilized tissue.

2.7 Bioclimatic parameters

Using the central coordinates of every provenance region (Table 1), bioclimatic data for three decades (1970–2000) were obtained from WorldClim (https://www.worldclim.org/data/worldclim21.html). More than 25 parameters were applied, and those more highly correlated with survival were selected: June precipitation (P6, mm); annual precipitation (P, mm); mean minimal temperature in August (T8, °C); annual mean temperature (Tm, °C); mean temperature of warmest quarter (Ts, °C); maximum temperature of warmest month (Tmax, °C); and Martonne aridity index (MAR), estimated as follows:

$$MAR=\frac{P}{Tm+10}$$
(1)

and Rivas-Martínez thermicity index (RV), calculated as follows:

$$RV=10 \times \left(Tm+Tmax+Tmin\right)$$
(2)

where Tmin is the minimum temperature of the coldest month of each population (°C).

2.8 Statistical analysis

Morphological traits (H, AH, and NB) were analyzed using a mixed model where the population was considered as a random effect. Disease development variables (SWd, EWd, DWd, and W) were analyzed with a mixed model where both the population and the block were considered as random effects. For survival (S), analysis was performed using a binomial generalized mixed model with block and population as random effects. Additionally, so as to evaluate the existence of variation in susceptibility to PWN among geographic groups and populations within these groups, survival was reanalyzed considering the geographic group as a fixed effect and the population nested within geographic group and block as random effects. Lastly, differences among populations for each geographic group were evaluated with population and block as random effects.

All analyses were performed with R (version 4.0.3 Vienna, Austria; R Core Team 2020). For analysis of morphological traits and disease development variables, the lmer function from lme4 package (Bates et al. 2015) was used. When needed, the variables were transformed to achieve normality and homoscedasticity assumptions. For survival analysis, glmer logit function from the lme4 package was used. The Tukey test was performed to find significant differences among geographic groups. Finally, predicted survival for each population was estimated with the inverse logit function in each model.

In all analyses, the significance of random factors was determined using the likelihood ratio test (LRT):

$$LRT=-2\times\left(LLRreduced-LLRfull\right)$$
(3)

where the \(LLRreduced\) is the restricted log likelihood of the model without the random effect of interest and \(LLRfull\) is the restricted log likelihood of the whole model.

Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to search for nematode density differences among populations in the stem, roots, and total seedling.

Spearman’s correlation was estimated to measure phenotypic correlation among all variables using the observed values and BLUP correlation using the population BLUP. The BLUPs for survival were obtained from the mixed model analysis where the geographic group was not considered. We then computed residuals from the mixed model analyses for each trait; these residues do not include the main effects. Using these residuals, the Spearman’s correlations were calculated again.

All chemical compounds were analyzed by ANOVA using the two resistance classes and the 5 populations nested within each resistance class as fixed factors.

To analyze bioclimatic parameters, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. First, Pearson correlations for bioclimatic parameters, latitude, and survival rate were determined. Variables correlated to survival were chosen for the PCA analysis. Then, a linear regression was performed with survival rate as the dependent variable and principal components (PC) as independent variables, to determine the relation between PC and survival.

3 Results

3.1 Morphological traits

All morphological traits differed significantly among populations (Table 2). HSFRVG006, PTES06, and populations from the Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula showed the highest values for height variables (H and ΔH). Moreover, PTES06 and PTES04 had the highest number of branches. In contrast, Moroccan populations presented the lowest growth and number of branches (data not shown).

Table 2 Mean values ± standard deviations (SD), variance components (σ2), likelihood ratio significance test (χ2LRT)

3.2 Survival and disease duration

Highly significant differences were found for wilting symptoms and survival among populations (Table 2). Mean survival at the end of the experiment was 44%, and the mean wilting symptom level was 4.9, ranging by population from PTES20 (100% survival and 2.2 for wilting symptoms) to PTESF (6% survival and 6.56 for wilting symptoms). The Galician populations (PTES01a and PTES01b), PTES09, and both seed orchards were the most susceptible to PWN, with the lowest survival values and the highest symptom levels. In contrast, populations from the south of the Iberian Peninsula presented the highest survival and the lowest symptom levels (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pinus pinaster populations evaluated in the experiment. The color gradient represents the different intervals of the observed survival rate

We found highly significant differences among geographic groups (χ2LRT = 25.94, p < 0.001) and populations within groups (χ2LRT = 18.89, p < 0.001) for survival at the end of the experiment. The ratio population variance to residual variance was 0.49 when only population and block were considered, and it decreased to 0.19 when the geographic group was added (data not shown). Hence, a large part of the population variance obtained initially could be explained by the geographic group. The southeast of the Iberian Peninsula was the most resistant geographic group since it showed both the highest best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) and predicted survival (0.62, Fig. 2). By contrast, the Atlantic coast and Central Iberian Peninsula geographic groups had the lowest predicted survival (0.21 and 0.31, respectively). The predicted survival for the rest of geographic groups was 0.25 for France-Catalonia region, 0.35 for Morocco-Oria region, and 0.39 for Corsica Island. Significant differences among populations within each geographic group were found for all groups, except the Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula populations (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Survival ranking of populations by geographic group at 133 DAI. Values were calculated from a binomial generalized mixed model with geographic group as a fixed effect and populations within geographic groups and blocks as random effects. The predicted survival for each geographic group is shown in brackets. Solid horizontal line represents best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs) of each geographic group on the logit scale. Gray bars represent best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPS) of each population on the logit scale. Vertical lines are standard errors of BLUPS. Seed orchards are highlighted with a red rectangle. ACIB, Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula; CEIB, Central Iberian Peninsula; FCR, France-Catalonia region; MO, Morocco-Oria region; Cor, Corsica Island; SEIB, southeast the Iberian Peninsula

No differences were found for the start, end, and duration of symptoms for populations (SWd, EWd, and DWd, Table 2). On average, first symptoms started 41 DAI, and seedlings died at 66 DAI.

3.3 Nematode density

Analyses of nematode densities revealed significant differences among populations in roots (χ2 = 48.33, p = 0.041), stem (χ2 = 55.05, p = 0.009), and total seedling (χ2 = 50.66, p = 0.025, Fig. 3). The median number of B. xylophilus recovered from the total seedling ranged from 0.1 to 2123.66 nem·gdw1. At the end of the assay, the vast majority of the surviving seedlings showed mean wilting symptoms below level 3 (92 out of 95) and not more than 22 nem·gdw−1. The only three seedlings that survived with a wilting level of 5 had higher numbers of nematodes (PTES17, 167.9 nem·gdw−1; PTMAATLA, 265.1 nem·gdw−1; and PTES18, 1115.0 nem·gdw−1). No B. xylophilus were recovered from control seedlings (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Bursaphelenchus xylophilus per gram of dry wood of the entire plant (roots, stem, and needles) by population. Circles represent outliers, and horizontal line represents median values

3.4 Correlations

Phenotypic correlations showed that survival was negatively correlated with all morphological traits, except the number of branches. Nematode densities (NDr, NDs, and NDt) were negatively correlated with survival, and NDs and NDt were also negatively correlated with some disease duration variables (SWd and EWd). BLUP correlations showed that survival was negatively correlated with all morphological traits. SWd was positively correlated with EWd (Table 3). Regarding the residual correlations, we found no significant correlation for any trait except for the number of branches that showed a slight positive correlation with survival (0.08, p-value < 0.05). Thus, there is no environmental effect identified affecting two traits at the same time.

Table 3 Spearman’s correlation matrix of BLUPs (above the diagonal) and phenotypic (below the diagonal) coefficients between pairs of traits

3.5 Chemical compounds

Significant differences between resistant classes were found for constitutive total polyphenols, lipid-soluble substances, and condensed tannins. Moreover, we observed significant differences in populations within resistant groups for nitrogen, total polyphenols, condensed tannins, and soluble monosaccharides (Table 4). Populations in the resistant class had lower levels of constitutive total polyphenols, lipid-soluble substances, and condensed tannins than those in the susceptible class. The summary statistics for each chemical compound in each resistant class and population was shown in Table 5 in Appendix.

Table 4 Results of ANOVA, LSMean values ± standard deviations (SD) by resistance classes for constitutive chemical compounds, F ratios (degrees of freedom shown as subscript), and p-values are shown

3.6 Relation with bioclimatic variables

Only one principal component (PC) was significant in the PCA regression with survival (PC1; t-value = 4.37; p ≤ 0.001; Fig. 4). This PC had a positive relation with survival and explained 63.37% of the climate variables. It was positively associated with temperature variables (Tm, T8, Ts, Tmax, and RV) and negatively associated with precipitation and a geographical variable (P, P6, MAR, and latitude). Specifically, populations coming from places with high temperatures in summer and low precipitation (especially in summer) had higher survival after nematode inoculation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Principal component analysis defined by one component and represented as a ranking of aridity climate conditions. ACIB, Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula; CEIB, Central Iberian Peninsula; FCR, France-Catalonia region; MO, Morocco-Oria region; Cor, Corsica Island; SEIB, southeast the Iberian Peninsula; dashed black line represents the main survival trend (R2 = 0.37, p-value < 0.001)

4 Discussion

Our study confirms the large variability of P. pinaster susceptibility to B. xylophilus among populations and also among geographic groups, with the largest resistance in southern Iberian populations. Considering the geographic groups, there were differences among populations within all groups, except the Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula group. The relation found in this study between survival and morphological traits agree with other authors, since survival is negatively related to growth rate and the number of nematodes (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017b, 2018). Besides, we have observed an association between PWN resistance and concentration in needles of some constitutive chemical compounds, such as lipid-soluble substances. Lastly, as other authors reported for other species and diseases (Romeralo et al 2016), we found a clinal pattern in the PWN susceptibility among populations that was related to climate at the population site. Thus, a northwest to southeast gradient of survival was observed in the Iberian Peninsula.

The highly significant differences in resistance to PWN among populations found in this study corroborate the results reported by Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. (2017b) for six P. pinaster provenances. Other pine species have also shown differences among provenances for resistance to PWN, such as P. densiflora (Fujimoto et al. 1989; Fuyuan et al. 1996), Pinus massoniana Lamb. (Okamura et al. 2010), and P. thunbergii (Matsunaga et al. 2016). However, Hopf-Biziks et al. (2016) found no variation in resistance to this nematode among several German Pinus sylvestris L. provenances, since all of them displayed a 100% susceptibility at the end of the experiment. Currently, provenance-based variations in resistance to pathogens are commonly found in pine species. Examples include P. halepensis, Pinus contorta Douglas, P. sylvestris, and Picea abies L. to Gremmeniella abietina (Hansson 1998; Romeralo et al. 2016), P. sylvestris to Dothistroma septosporum (Perry et al. 2016), or Pinus tecunamii Eguiluz and Perry. and Pinus patula Schl. and Cham. to Fusarium circinatum Nirenberg and O’Donnell (Hodge and Dvorak 2007).

The large variation found in resistance to PWN among pine populations in Spain is an important finding and should be taken into account to more accurately predict the future impact of PWD there. De la Fuente et al. (2018) and De la Fuente and Saura (2021) developed disease-spread prediction models considering the same level of resistance for all P. pinaster populations. Currently, testing the resistance of adult populations in field trials is forbidden in Spain since B. xylophilus is a quarantined organism. For this reason, it is difficult to determine whether the resistance observed in greenhouse experiments can be extrapolated to field trials. Nevertheless, different studies reported a similar PWN susceptibility in young seedlings than in adult trees in some pine species (Hopf-Biziks and Schröder 2019; Linit and Tamura 1987; Donald et al. 2003; Daub 2008). Given this situation, introducing the resistance levels of each population in these models could provide us a rough prediction that would help predict where central, regional, and local governments should be more concerned about the spread of PWD.

Our results also highlight the high differentiation among geographic groups for resistance to PWN, even though differences among populations within regions remain significant. Other authors, such as Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. (2017b), Hurel et al. (2021), and De Miguel et al. (2022), also reported similar results for different pathogens when they grouped provenances into these geographic groups, based on Jaramillo-Correa et al. (2015). Analyzing each geographic group separately, all of them showed significant differences among populations for survival with the exception of the Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula group. Populations within each geographic group share the same evolutionary history (Jaramillo-Correa et al. 2015), but local adaptations within groups can affect the interaction between the population and multiple biotic and abiotic traits (Ramírez-Valiente et al. 2022). Some groups, such as Central Iberian Peninsula, southeast Iberian Peninsula, and Morocco-Oria region, have a great environmental heterogeneity which leads to small-scale local adaptations, as have been highlighted for growth traits (Alía et al. 1997; Archambeau et al. 2021; Hurel et al. 2021; Sugai et al. 2023). In the case of the France-Catalonia region group, the Pyrenees Mountain range is a physical barrier separating both populations, probably resulting in different specific adaptations, likely affecting the PWN resistance levels. On the contrary, the low environmental heterogeneity of the Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula group (Archambeau et al. 2021) could explain the lack of differentiation in PWN resistance among populations of this group.

The significant differences found among populations for nematode density in this study are not in agreement with the results of Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. (2017b), who found no differences among provenances. However, the number of provenances considered was different between their study and ours. We quantified nematode density in thirty-four populations from 32 provenances, while their study included six provenances. Since we increased the number of populations analyzed, the possibility of finding significant differences also increased. Therefore, the higher southern Iberian populations, which were the most resistant, had the lowest nematode densities. At the end of the assay, our findings corroborated those of Son and Moon (2013); lower symptoms in surviving seedlings were accompanied by lower nematode density, usually below 1 nem·gdw−1. As expected, and as other authors have reported (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017b, 2018), nematode density showed a negative correlation with survival and a positive correlation with symptomatology.

Growth traits were negatively correlated to survival, i.e., resistance to PWN. It seems that the lower the growth of a population, the greater its constitutive defenses (Matteo and Voltas 2016). While Carrasquinho et al. (2018) found positive relationships among survival and height in Portuguese half-sib P. pinaster families, other authors have demonstrated that greater height implies higher mortality (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2018). Similarly, the number of branches limits the spread of PWN through the host (Hakamata et al. 2013; Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017b, 2018). However, we observed that the populations with the lower number of branches had the higher survival. Breeding programs usually consider these traits as selection criteria. In comparison, the Galician seed orchard showed higher survival but lower growth rate than the French one. To improve resistance to PWD in both programs and avoid loss of growth yields, controlled cross-breeding with the most PWN-resistant populations may provide interesting options for breeding programs. Likewise, although the disease resistance was not considered in the Australian breeding program for P. pinaster, this program has included several provenances since its inception to improve several growth traits (Butcher 2007).

Despite the fact that PWN does not directly affect needles, constitutive defenses were studied in this tissue as a proxy, since several studies have already related the constitutive chemical compounds in needles with those in phloem and xylem (Wainhouse et al. 2000; Moreira et al. 2012; Alonso Santos et al. 2013, 2021). In addition, some authors already reported a significant relation between the susceptibility to PWN and the chemical composition in needles in P. massoniana (Zou et al. 2000) and P. radiata (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2021). The high concentration of total polyphenols, tannins, and lipid-soluble substances found in needles of susceptible populations is in agreement with the results reported by Zas et al. (2015) where the provenances with higher concentrations of total polyphenolic compounds had a higher incidence of nematode migration through branches in in vitro experiments. Conversely, even though it has not been studied in our work, it would be possible that resistant populations might have developed higher levels of induced defenses, since studies performed on coniferous species suggest that lower levels of constitutive defense in needles are related to a higher response of induced defenses (Moreira et al. 2014). Besides, the period of time between the attack and the induction of defenses is known to be a key factor against some diseases (Ganthaler et al. 2017). The relation between the level of total polyphenols and tannin content to PWN resistance is different at the species and provenance level. Our results suggest that resistant P. pinaster provenances have lower levels of these compounds than susceptible provenances, while resistant pine species show higher levels than susceptible pine species (Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017a; Pimentel et al. 2017b, a; Canas et al. 2021). Moreover, other authors have highlighted the important role of specific phenolic compounds as constitutive defenses in other coniferous species (Nunes da Silva et al. 2013; Ganthaler et al. 2017). Regarding the rest of chemical compounds, we did not find differences among resistance classes for nitrogen, monosaccharides, and starch. However, Alonso Santos et al. (2021), working at species level, reported higher levels of nitrogen and starch in needles of resistant pine species.

Even though differences were found in polyphenolic compounds and tannins concentrations, the wide variation observed among populations within resistance groups and the small number of populations represented make it difficult to establish for detecting resistant populations based on levels of these chemical compounds. Clearer results were obtained for liposoluble substances, and their content in needles could be a useful approach to discard the most susceptible populations. Nevertheless, since populations other than those analyzed can display different behaviors, these results must be considered cautiously. Further analysis of chemical compounds should be done in order to advance in this field.

In general, we observed that P. pinaster susceptibility varied according to the geographical origin of each population, as other studies have reported for other species (Hansson 1998; Hodge and Dvorak 2007; López-Goldar et al. 2015; Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. 2017b; Romeralo et al. 2016). Such differences in susceptibility to PWN may be due to how the different populations have adapted to their respective climates, as occurred with P. sylvestris provenances and resistance to D. septosporum (Perry et al. 2016). Indeed, Menéndez-Gutiérrez et al. (2017b) suggested that susceptibility could be related to the autumn precipitation and mean maximum temperature during summer at the original provenance sites. Different temperatures and precipitations among the different locations of each population can generate a significant differentiation in terms of adaptive traits (Correia et al. 2014). For example, P. pinaster response to drought stress varies depending on the origin of the population (Corcuera et al. 2012; Gaspar et al. 2013).

Populations originating from arid climates showed higher survival and lower growth traits than those populations originating from humid and temperate climates. The resource availability hypothesis supports our results since stressful environments with low-resource availability favor plants with higher levels of defenses and lower growth rates. Conversely, plants adapted to low-stress environments with ample resource availability tend to prioritize growth over defense mechanisms, resulting in lower disease resistance (Coley et al. 1985; Endara and Coley 2011). We suggest that adaptations to more arid origins may be associated with greater resistance to PWD. Future research lines could be developed to identify those possible adaptations to aridity, whether chemical or physical, may be associated with resistance to PWN. This is especially interesting in the context of climate change and rising temperatures.

5 Conclusion

The variation in resistance to PWN found in populations of P. pinaster was high. In addition, part of this variation can be explained by geographic groups. Both the height traits and number of branches are negatively correlated to resistance to PWN. Some constitutive chemical defenses found in this work, such as the constitutive level of lipid-soluble substances, could be a helpful reference for selecting the putatively most resistant P. pinaster populations. The adaptations to the climate of origin of each population affect the resistance to PWN. In addition, populations adapted to harsher, arid climates are more resistant than populations adapted to climates with less water stress and milder temperatures.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The custom code and/or software application generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Alía R, Moro J, Denis JB (1997) Performance of Pinus pinaster provenances in Spain: interpretation of the genotype by environment interaction. Can J For Res 27:1548–1559. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-27-10-1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alía R, Garcia del Barrio JM, Iglesias S et al (2009) Regiones de procedencia de especies forestales de España. OA Parques Nacionales, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso Santos M, Ignacio Quinteiro MF, Rozados Lorenzo MJ, et al (2013) Analogías y diferencias en el nivel de diversos parámetros químicos en tejidos de P. taeda (resistente a Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) y otros pinos (P. pinaster, P. radiata, P. sylvestris, P. halepensis y P. pinea), que pudieran ser susceptibles al nematodo en Galicia. 6° Congr For Español 1–9. ISBN: 978-84-937964-9-5

  • Alonso Santos M, Menéndez-Gutiérrez M, Díaz Vazquez R (2021) Constitutive chemical compounds in different tissues of seven pine species and their relationship with susceptibility to pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Environ Sci Proc 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/iecf2020-07767

  • Archambeau J, Garz MB, Vega MDM, Brachi B (2021) Extreme climatic events but not environmental heterogeneity shape within-population genetic variation in maritime pine. bioRxiv 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.17.456636

  • Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouffier L, Raffin A, Kremer A (2008) Evolution of genetic variation for selected traits in successive breeding populations of maritime pine. Heredity 101:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2008.41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo F, Guijarro M, Cámara A, et al (2017) La situación de los bosques y el sector forestal en España – ISFE 2017. ISBN: 978-84-941695-5-7

  • Butcher TB (2007) Achievements in forest tree genetic improvement in Australia and New Zealand 7: maritime pine and brutian pine tree improvement programs in Western Australia. Aust For 70(3):141–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2007.10675014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canas S, Trindade CS, Sun B, Naves P (2021) Phenolic compounds involved in pine wilt disease: HPLC-based method development and validation for their quantification. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 30:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-020-00599-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasquinho I, Lisboa A, Inácio ML, Gonçalves E (2018) Genetic variation in susceptibility to pine wilt disease of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) half-sib families. Ann For Sci 75:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0759-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. 3rd edition. Science (New York) 230(4728):895–899. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.230.4728.895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corcuera L, Gil-Pelegrin E, Notivol E (2012) Aridity promotes differences in proline and phytohormone levels in Pinus pinaster populations from contrasting environments. Trees Struct Funct 26:799–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0651-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Correia I, Santos L, Faria C et al (2014) Cone to seedling—variation between Pinus pinaster provenances from contrasting altitudes. For Sci 60:724–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dattnoff LE, Elmer WH, Huber DM (2007) Mineral and plant disease (no. L-0809). American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, p 278. ISBN: 978-0-89054-346-7

  • Daub M (2008) Investigations on pathogenicity, invasion biology and population dynamics of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner und Buhrer 1934) Nickle 1970 in European conifers. PhD dissertation

  • De la Fuente B, Saura S, Beck PSA (2018) Predicting the spread of an invasive tree pest: the pine wood nematode in southern Europe. J Appl Ecol 55:2374–2385. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Fuente B, Saura S (2021) Long-term projections of the natural expansion of the pine wood nematode in the Iberian Peninsula. Forests 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070849

  • De Miguel M, Rodríguez-Quilón I, Heuertz M et al (2022) Polygenic adaptation and negative selection across traits, years and environments in a long-lived plant species (Pinus pinaster Ait., Pinaceae). Mol Ecol 31:2089–2105. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez MT (1987) Influencia de nutrientes y polifernoles getales en la humificación de la horarasca de especies autóctonas e introducidas en la provincia de Huelva. INIA, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald PA, Stamps WT, Linit MJ, Todd TC (2003) Pine wilt disease. Plant Health Instr. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-I-2003-0130-01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endara MJ, Coley PD (2011) The resource availability hypothesis revisited: a meta-analysis. Funct Ecol 25:389–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01803.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans HF, McNamara DG, Braasch H et al (1996) Pest risk analysis (PRA) for the territories of the European Union (as PRA area) on Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and its vectors in the genus Monochamus. EPPO Bull 26:199–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.1996.tb00594.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto Y, Toda T, Nishimura K et al (1989) Breeding project on resistance to the pine-wood nematode. An outline of the research and the achievement of the project for ten years. Bull For Tree Breed 7:1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuyuan X, Minghong G, Zhenchang Z, Kegong Z (1996) Studies on resistance of pine species and Masson pine provenances to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and the epidemic law of the nematode in Nanjing. For Res 9:521–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganthaler A, Stöggl W, Kranner I, Mayr S (2017) Foliar phenolic compounds in Norway spruce with varying susceptibility to Chrysomyxa rhododendri: analyses of seasonal and infection-induced accumulation patterns. Front Plant Sci 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar MJ, Velasco T, Feito I et al (2013) Genetic variation of drought tolerance in Pinus pinaster at three hierarchical levels: a comparison of induced osmotic stress and field testing. PLoS One 8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González-Martínez SC, Alía R, Gil L (2002) Population genetic structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): a comparison of allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Heredity 89:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hakamata T, Kato K, Yamamoto S (2013) Correlation of seedling size and branch number with disease resistance of Pinus thunbergii seedlings to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. For Pathol 43:238–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson P (1998) Susceptibility of different provenances of Pinus sylvestris, Pinus contorta and Picea abies to Gremmeniella abietina. Eur J For Pathol 28:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1998.tb01162.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge GR, Dvorak WS (2007) Variation in pitch canker resistance among provenances of Pinus patula and Pinus tecunumanii from Mexico and Central America. New For 33:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9023-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf-Biziks A, Schröder T (2019) Population dynamics and pathogenicity of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in seven-to-eight-year-old Pinus sylvestris trees. J Kulturpflanzen 71:109–130. https://doi.org/10.5073/JfK.2019.05.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf-Biziks A, Schröder T, Schütz S (2016) The pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner & Buhrer) Nickle, and its pathogenicity to German Pinus sylvestris provenances. J Plant Dis Prot 123:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-016-0005-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurel A, de Miguel M, Dutech C et al (2021) Genetic basis of growth, spring phenology, and susceptibility to biotic stressors in maritime pine. Evol Appl 14:2750–2772. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo-Correa JP, Rodríguez-Quilón I, Grivet D et al (2015) Molecular proxies for climate maladaptation in a long-lived tree (Pinus pinaster Aiton, Pinaceae). Genetics 199:793–807. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.173252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Junta de Castilla y León (2019) ORDEN FYM/380/2019, de 11 de abril, por la que se establece una zona demarcada y se adoptan en ella medidas fitosanitarias de emergencia para el control del nematodo de la madera del pino, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buhrer) Nickle et al., en la provincia de Salamanca. Boletín Of. Castilla y León 20330–20338

  • Kurinobu S (2008) Current status of resistance breeding of Japanese pine species to pine wilt disease. Forest Sci Technol 4:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2008.9656338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamy JB, Bouffier L, Burlett R et al (2011) Uniform selection as a primary force reducing population genetic differentiation of cavitation resistance across a species range. PLoS One 6(8):e23476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamy JB, Frederic L, Plomion C et al (2012) Micro-evolutionary patterns of juvenile wood density in a pine species. Plant Ecol 213:1781–1792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0133-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linit MJ (1988) Nematode-vector relationships in the pine wilt disease system. J Nematol 20:227–235

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linit MJ, Tamura H (1987) Relative susceptibility of four pine species to infection by pinewood nematode. J Nematol 19:44–50

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López-Goldar X, Sampedro L, Zas R (2015) Defensive strategies in Pinus pinaster: interpopulation variation in constitutive and induced allocation to chemical defences. In: Conference: genetics of host-parasite interactions in forestry

  • Matsunaga K, Miyata S, Iwaizumi M, et al (2016) Genetic diversity and pinewood nematode resistant breeding project of Pinus thunbergii in Kyushu region. In: 127th Annual JFS Meeting. p 6

  • Matteo GD, Voltas J (2016) Multienvironment evaluation of Pinus pinaster provenances: evidence of genetic trade-offs between adaptation to optimal conditions and resistance to the maritime pine bast scale (Matsucoccus feytaudi). For Sci 62:553–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez-Gutiérrez M, Alonso M, Jimenez E et al (2017a) Interspecific variation of constitutive chemical compounds in Pinus spp. xylem and susceptibility to pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Eur J Plant Pathol 150:939–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-017-1334-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez-Gutiérrez M, Alonso M, Toval G, Díaz R (2017b) Variation in pinewood nematode susceptibility among Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances from the Iberian Peninsula and France. Ann For Sci 74:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0677-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez-Gutiérrez M, Alonso M, Toval G, Díaz R (2018) Testing of selected Pinus pinaster half-sib families for tolerance to pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Forestry 91:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpx030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez-Gutiérrez M, Alonso M, Díaz R (2021) Assessing genetic variation in resistance to pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) in Pinus radiata Don half-sib families. Forests 12(11):1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira X, Zas R, Sampedro L (2012) Differential allocation of constitutive and induced chemical defenses in pine tree juveniles: a test of the optimal defense theory. PLoS One 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira X, Mooney KA, Rasmann S et al (2014) Trade-offs between constitutive and induced defences drive geographical and climatic clines in pine chemical defences. Ecol Lett 17:537–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern EK (1996) Geographic variation in forest trees: genetic basis and application of knowledge in silviculture. UBC Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Mota MM, Braasch H, Bravo MA et al (1999) First report of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Portugal and in Europe. Nematol Int J Fundam Appl Nematol Res 1:727–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Mota MM, Futai K, Vieira P (2009) Pine wilt disease and the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus BT. In: Ciancio A, Mukerji KG (eds) Integrated management of fruit crops nematodes. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 253–274

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nose M, Shiraishi S (2008) Breeding for resistance to pine wilt disease. pp 334–350

  • Nunes da Silva M, Lima MRM, Vasconcelos MW (2013) Susceptibility evaluation of Picea abies and Cupressus lusitanica to the pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Plant Pathol 62:1398–1406. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura Y, Toda T, Ubukata M (2010) Results of the cooperative development of technology for pine wilt nematode resistance breeding in Anhui province. For Tree Breed 237:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry A, Brown AV, Cavers S et al (2016) Has Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) co-evolved with Dothistroma septosporum in Scotland? Evidence for spatial heterogeneity in the susceptibility of native provenances. Evol Appl 9:982–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12395

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel CS, Firmino PN, Calvão T et al (2017a) Pinewood nematode population growth in relation to pine phloem chemical composition. Plant Pathol 66:856–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel CS, Gonçalves EV, Firmino PN et al (2017b) Differences in constitutive and inducible defences in pine species determining susceptibility to pinewood nematode. Plant Pathol 66:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Ramírez-Valiente JA, Santos del Blanco L, Alía R et al (2022) Adaptation of Mediterranean forest species to climate: lessons from common garden experiments. J Ecol 110:1022–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues AM, Mendes MD, Lima AS, et al (2017) Pinus halepensis, Pinus pinaster, Pinus pinea and Pinus sylvestris essential oils chemotypes and monoterpene hydrocarbon enantiomers, before and after inoculation with the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Chem Biodivers 14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201600153

  • Romeralo C, Witzell J, Diez JJ (2016) Aleppo pine provenances vary in susceptibility and secondary chemical response to Gremmeniella abietina infection. Plant Pathol 65:664–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scalbert A, Monties B, Janin G (1989) Tannins in wood: comparison of different estimation methods. J Agric Food Chem 37:1324–1329. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00089a026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder T, Mcnamara DG, Gaar V (2009) Guidance on sampling to detect pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in trees, wood and insects. EPPO Bull 39(2):179–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2009.02287.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliman T, Mourits MCM, van der Werf W et al (2012) Framework for modelling economic impacts of invasive species, applied to pine wood nematode in europe. PLoS One 7(9):e45505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045505

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Son JA, Moon YS (2013) Migrations and multiplications of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and B. mucronatus in Pinus thumbergii in relation to their pathogenicity. Plant Pathol J 29:116–122. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.06.2012.0091

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps WT, Linit MJ (1998) Neutral storage lipid and exit behavior of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus fourth-stage dispersal juveniles from their beetle vectors. J Nematol 30:255–261

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugai K, Setsuko S, Nagamitsu T et al (2023) Environmental and genetic effects on phenotypic differences between Elaeocarpus photiniifolia (Elaeocarpaceae) ecotypes in dry and mesic habitats on a Japanese oceanic island. Plant Species Biol 38:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente C, Espada M, Vieira P, Mota M (2012) Pine wilt disease: a threat to European forestry. Eur J Plant Pathol 133:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-011-9924-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wainhouse D, Ashburner R, Forrest GI, Boswell RC (2000) The effect of variation in light and nitrogen on the composition of resin in young Sitka spruce. Silvae Genet 49:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Xunta de Galicia (2019) RESOLUCIÓN de 28 de diciembre de 2018, de la Dirección General de Ganadería, Agricultura e Industrias Agroalimentarias, por la que se declara en el territorio de la Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia la presencia de cinco nuevos positivos del organismo de cuarentena Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buhrer) Nickle et al. (nemátodo del pino) y se ordena comenzar las medidas para su erradicación. D. Of. Galicia 8:1559–1573

  • Zas R, Moreira X, Ramos M et al (2015) Intraspecific variation of anatomical and chemical defensive traits in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) as factors in susceptibility to the pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Trees Struct Funct 29:663–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-1143-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zas R, Merlo E (2008) El programa de mejora genética de Pinus pinaster en Galicia. Boletín del CIDEU 6–7:5–24. ISSN:1885-5237

  • Zou Y, Sun H et al (2000) Correlation between element contents and Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Masson’s pine. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol 27:24–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ricardo Ferradás, Eva Prada, Margarita Alonso, and Francis Ignacio for their technical assistance.

Code availability

The custom code and/or software application generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This work was funded with National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (RTA2017-00012-C02-01 project), rural development program funds of Galicia 2014–2020 co-financed 75% with FEADER fund (AC-2020), and INDITEX enterprise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, RD; methodology, RD; investigation, ETS and LV; data curation, ETS and LV; formal analysis, ETS; writing — original draft preparation, ETS; writing — review and editing, ETS, MMG, LV, and RD; funding acquisition, MMG and RD; and supervision, RD. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esteban Torres-Sánchez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors gave their informed consent to this publication and its content.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling editor: Christelle Robinet

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection on “Advances in the understanding of the pine wilt disease and in its management strategy”.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 5
figure 5

Black columns represent BLUPS (on the logit scale, right axis), white columns show predicted survival (scale 0–1, left axis), and gray columns indicate observed survival (scale 0–1, left axe of the graphic) for each population. Values were calculated from a binomial generalized mixed model for survival at 133 DAI with population and block as random effects. Vertical lines are standard errors of each variable

Table 5 Statistical summary for chemical compounds in needles by resistance classes

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torres-Sánchez, E., Menéndez-Gutiérrez, M., Villar, L. et al. The effects of provenance, climate, and chemical defense on the resistance of Pinus pinaster Aiton to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer). Annals of Forest Science 80, 33 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-023-01202-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-023-01202-x

Keywords