- Research Paper
- Open access
- Published:
Canopy gap impacts on soil organic carbon and nutrient dynamic: a meta-analysis
Annals of Forest Science volume 81, Article number: 12 (2024)
Abstract
Key message
The forest canopy gaps, formed by natural or anthropogenic factors, have been found to reduce soil carbon content and increase nutrient availability. The magnitudes of these effects have been observed to increase with gap age and size, and are largely influenced by changes in temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation.
Context
Local studies have illustrated the influence of canopy gaps on the spatial heterogeneity of soil carbon and nutrients, playing a pivotal role in driving forest regeneration and succession. Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown whether the response of soil carbon and nutrient content to gap formation is consistent across forest ecosystems at global scale.
Aims
The aim of this paper is to assess the homogeneity of the observed responses of soil carbon and nutrients following gap formation among a wide array of forest ecosystems and climatic regions.
Methods
We performed a meta-analysis synthesizing 2127 pairwise observations from 52 published articles to quantify the changes in in soil physical, chemical, and microbial variables resulting from gap creation in natural forests and plantations spanning tropical to boreal regions.
Results
Canopy gaps resulted in significant decrease of soil organic carbon (Corg) and microbial carbon (Cmic). The concentrations of ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3−), and available phosphorus (available P) increased following gap creation. These changes mainly occurred in the growing season and in the mineral soil layer, becoming more pronounced with increasing gap age and size. The change in Corg was negatively regulated by mean annual precipitation, and was associated with the changes in Nt and Nmic. The change in NH4+ was positively regulated by mean annual temperature, and was associated with the changes in available P and oxidoreductases (Ox-EEAs). The model explaining the change in soil carbon content exhibited a higher explanatory power than the one accounting for changes in soil nutrient availability.
Conclusion
The results indicated that forest canopy gaps resulted in a reduction in soil carbon content and an increase in nutrient availability. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the role of small-scale disturbances as drivers of forest ecosystem succession.
1 Introduction
Canopy gaps widely occur in forest communities and are mainly formed by natural treefalls or as a consequence of selective logging (Pollmann 2002). The heterogeneity of environmental resources caused by the occurrence of canopy gaps drives plant community succession (Fahey and Puettmann 2008; Kelemen et al. 2012; McNab et al. 2021). Numerous studies have shown that canopy gap dynamics, along with the resulting variations in light, temperature, and soil moisture regimes (Gray et al. 2002; Ritter et al. 2005; Galhidy et al. 2006), generally promote forest regeneration and succession (Yamamoto 2000; Dechnik-Vazquez et al. 2016; Zhu et al. 2021; Lu et al. 2023). For instance, a global meta-analysis demonstrated that canopy gaps enhanced woody plant regeneration and that the effects were influenced by gap characteristics, such as gap age and size, and environmental factors (Zhu et al. 2014). Meanwhile, recent local studies have reported that the plant community succession and microclimatic change following canopy gap creation exert certain impacts on the soil carbon flow and nutrient cycling (Gough et al. 2021; Griffiths et al. 2021).
Forest regrowth following disturbances plays a crucial role in facilitating the terrestrial biosphere's noticeable absorption of anthropogenic CO2 emissions (Pugh et al. 2019; Jayakrishnan et al. 2022). Nevertheless, the impacts of creating canopy gaps on soil carbon fractions have shown ambiguity, with reports of both positive and negative effects, as well as instances where no impact was observed (dos Santos et al. 2016; Amolikondori et al. 2022). To a considerable extent, this disparity can be accounted for by the reality that canopy gaps modify the decomposition patterns of soil organic matter, thereby impacting the storage of carbon in the soil. Simultaneously, canopy gaps elevate environmental heterogeneity, giving rise to distinct microbial community structures and vegetation compositions. This, in turn, influences the input of exogenous organic carbon into the soil.
Mounting evidence suggests that soil nutrient availability stands out as a primary limiting factor for forest primary productivity, co-regulated by plant diversity and species turnover throughout the stages of forest succession (Long et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2021; Joshi and Garkoti 2023). Typically, canopy gaps play a role in expediting soil nutrient cycling within forest successional processes, encompassing nutrient release, migration, and transformation (Muscolo et al. 2014). In addition, canopy gap characteristics, including size, spatial pattern, locations, and frequency, can influence light and water distribution as well as rates of litterfall decomposition, potentially leading to changes in nutrient availability (Zhang and Zak 1995; Eysenrode et al. 2002; Prescott 2002; Mataji and Vahedi 2021). Hence, it is imperative to investigate the alterations in soil nutrient availability following gap creation, aiming to discern the potential ramifications on forest regeneration and succession within forest ecosystems.
The heightened levels of light, temperature, and rainfall, coupled with diminished plant nutrient uptake, may collectively govern soil carbon and nutrient dynamics following gap formation. The impacts of canopy gap creation on forest regeneration and succession are closely associated with climate conditions at larger spatial scales (Ackerly 2003; Zhu et al. 2014; Pope et al. 2023). Furthermore, there is a well-established correlation between the characteristics of canopy gaps and the composition as well as dynamics of forest stands (Kneeshaw and Bergeron 1998; Ren et al. 2021). Therefore, future climate condition changes would greatly increase the uncertainty of the impacts of canopy gap creation on soil carbon and nutrient availability across various forest types.
The objectives of this paper are: (1) to investigate the effects of canopy gaps on carbon content and available nutrients; (2) to identify when and where canopy gaps may significantly impact soil carbon content and available nutrients; (3) to assess whether climate conditions would promote or constrain the effects of canopy gaps on soil carbon sink and fertility. Our findings will not only broaden the understanding of the response of the soil carbon pool and nutrient availability to small-scale disturbances but also aid in exploring the potential mechanisms of canopy gap effects on forest regeneration and succession.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Data collection
We compiled our dataset by collecting articles published before September 2021 from the Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The keyword combinations used for retrieval were (("canopy gap" OR "treefall gap" OR "forest gap") AND ("soil" OR "microbial" OR "soil enzyme") AND ("carbon" OR "nitrogen" OR "phosphorus" OR "nutrient" OR "stoichiometry"). To avoid unintentional biases, we developed the following criteria to select pooled articles: (i) the article had to be a field survey conducted in forest areas; (ii) both canopy gaps and forest understory control treatments were reported; (iii) canopy gaps underwent strict natural recovery processes without artificial nutrient input or tree planting; (iv) if the study contains samples from multiple time points, the data applied to analyze the canopy gap effects for the growing season and non-growing season was extracted from the middle of the growth season and the end of non-growing season, respectively; (v) information on the sample size and the means of control and treatment groups were explicitly reported (Fig. 10 in Appendix). In total, 2127 paired observations were extracted from 52 articles that met the abovementioned criteria (Text 1 in Appendix), and the dataset was made publicly available in the Figshare repository (Tong et al. 2023). The geographic distribution of the canopy gap experiments in the meta-analysis is shown in Fig. 1.
2.2 Data compilation
The variables extracted from the included studies were classified into five main groups: (i) basic soil characteristics (i.e., pH, soil moisture, and soil temperature), (ii) soil organic carbon and total nutrients (i.e., soil organic carbon [Corg], total nitrogen [Nt], total phosphorus [Pt], and ratio of soil organic carbon to total nitrogen [C:N]), (iii) soil available nutrients (i.e., ammonium [NH4+], nitrate [NO3−], and available phosphorus [available P]), (iv) the activities of extracellular enzymes (i.e., hydrolases [Hy-EEAs] and oxidoreductases [Ox-EEAs]), and (v) soil microbial biomass carbon and nutrients (i.e., microbial biomass carbon [Cmic], microbial biomass nitrogen [Nmic], microbial biomass phosphorus [Pmic], and the ratio of microbial biomass carbon to microbial biomass nitrogen [Cmic:Nmic]). For each observation, we also recorded the other parameters, such as the latitude and longitude of the experimental locations, climate patterns encompassing the mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP), forest type (natural forest and plantation), and other information (canopy gap age and size, sampling time and location). We also extracted each sampling site's mean UV radiation data from a global dataset (http://www.ufz.de/gluv) (Beckmann et al. 2014). The correlation between geographical and climatic variables is shown in Table 1 in Appendix. The mean (\(\overline{X }\)), sample size (n), and standard deviation (SD) of all variables were extracted from the original articles. If the study used standard error (SE) rather than SD, we used \({\text{SD}}={\text{SE}}\times \sqrt{n}\) to calculate SD. When some studies did not report the SD or SE (n = 283), we multiplied the reported mean by the average coefficient of variance of the complete dataset to calculate the missing SD (Weir et al. 2018). Data were directly obtained from the table or text, and those in digitized graphs were extracted with Getdata Graph Digitizer (version 2.22, Moscow, Russia).
We subdivided the potential categorical variables influencing changes in soil carbon content and available nutrients following gap creation. These variables encompassed sampling time (growing season and non-growing season), sampling location (gap center and gap edge), sampling layer (mineral layer (0–30 cm) and organic layer), gap origins (natural and artificial), gap age (≤ 3, 4–10, and > 10 years), and gap size (≤ 100, 101–400, and > 400 m2). We established these thresholds for potential categories primarily by referencing previous meta-analyses (e.g., Zhu et al. (2014)), determining general breakpoints from manipulative canopy gap experiments within our dataset, and analyzing the data distribution of numerical variables related to canopy gap characteristics (Fig. 12 in Appendix). In addition, the canopy gap age ranged from 1 to 40 years, and the gap size ranged from 14 to 1600 m2.
2.3 Statistical analyses
The effects of canopy gap creation on soil carbon content and available nutrients were calculated by the natural log-transformed response ratio (lnRR) according to Hedges et al. (1999):
where \(\overline{{Y }_{t}}\) and \(\overline{{Y }_{c}}\) are the means of variables in the canopy gap treatment group and forest understory control group, respectively. The variance (v) of each lnRR was calculated as follows:
where \({s}_{t}\) and \({s}_{c}\) are the SDs of variables in the canopy gap treatment group and forest understory control group, respectively; \({n}_{t}\) and \({n}_{c}\) are the sample sizes for the canopy gap treatment group and forest understory control group, respectively.
The meta-analysis was performed using OpenMEE software (Wallace et al. 2017), which took the "study" as a random factor to determine the mean effect size of each variable. Confidence intervals (CI) of effect size were calculated using the maximum likelihood (ML) random-effect model. An effect of canopy gap treatment was considered significant if the 95% CI did not overlap zero. The overall effects of canopy gap creation on soil carbon content and available nutrients were identified first. Subsequently, subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the response of soil carbon content and available nutrients to canopy gap creation among different categorical comparisons (sampling time, sampling location, or gap characteristics). Higgins I2 statistics and the Q test were used to quantify the heterogeneity degree (Qm) among different studies. The random-effects model was used for highly heterogeneous studies (I2 > 50% and p < 0.05) rather than a fixed-effect model because it had the characteristics of close weights among studies and extensive applicability.
OpenMEE software offered the standard tools for exploring publication bias, including 'fail-safe N' (Rosenberg 2005) and funnel plots (Egger et al. 1997). If the fail-safe number was higher than 5n + 10 (n represented the number of paired observations in the analysis), it could be concluded that the current result was robust and believable. Funnel plots should be funnel-shaped and symmetrically centered around the summary effect estimate of the analysis in the absence of bias and heterogeneity. In this study, it was suggested that no publication biases were detected from our results, except for Cmic:Nmic (Table 2 and Fig. 11 in Appendix). We used the forest plot to show the results of this meta-analysis, and its generation was performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.0.0 for Windows.
We utilized network visualization in Gephi software to demonstrate significant correlations (Chen et al. 2019). In this approach, variables in the dataset were represented by network nodes, and pairwise conditional associations between variables were depicted by edges. Moreover, all network edges connected nodes that exceeded a predefined significant threshold calculated through Pearson correlation (p-value < 0.05).
The random-forest method was employed to identify the primary predictors of the response ratios for carbon content and nutrient availability. Concurrently, predicted partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) was utilized to analyze the impacts of biotic and abiotic factors on changes in carbon content and nutrient availability resulting from gap opening. All the aforementioned data analyses were conducted using R 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2020).
3 Results
3.1 Mean canopy gap effects
Overall, canopy gaps increased soil moisture and soil temperature but did not affect soil pH (Fig. 2). Canopy gaps had a negative effect on Corg and Nt but a positive effect on Pt. For available nutrients, canopy gaps enhanced NH4+, NO3−, and available P by 19.4%, 13.5%, and 17.3%, respectively. Canopy gaps reduced the Ox-EEAs while having no significant effect on the Hy-EEAs. Furthermore, canopy gaps exhibited significant negative effects on Cmic, Nmic, and Pmic, but a positive effect on Cmic:Nmic.
3.2 Factors influencing the changes induced by canopy gaps
We employed the subgroup analysis method to evaluate the factors influencing canopy gap effects, as illustrated in Figs. 3 and 4. During the non-growing season, canopy gaps exhibited a negative impact on soil pH. Throughout both the growing and non-growing seasons, canopy gaps led to increased soil moisture and soil temperature. In the non-growing season, canopy gaps negatively affected Corg and Nt, whereas no effects were observed during the growing season. In the growing season, the Pt, available P, NH4 +, and NO3− were enhanced following gap creation. Canopy gaps significantly reduced Ox-EEAs in both the growing and non-growing seasons, with no significant effect observed on Hy-EEAs. In the growing season, canopy gaps resulted in decreased Cmic and Nmic, and in the non-growing season, there were reductions in Nmic and Pmic. (Fig. 3a).
Canopy gaps exerted a negative impact on soil pH in the organic layer, while showing no effect in the mineral layer. Canopy gaps increased the soil moisture by 7.6% and 15.9% in the mineral and organic layers, respectively, and only increased soil temperature by 5.1% in the mineral layer. The Corg and Nt decreased while Pt increased in the mineral layer due to gap opening. Canopy gaps notably enhanced available P, NH4 +, and NO3− in the mineral layer but were statistically insignificant in the organic layer. The Ox-EEAs decreased in the mineral layer, and Hy-EEAs increased in the organic layer following gap creation (Fig. 3b).
Canopy gaps had a negative effect on soil pH at the gap edge but not at the gap center. The soil moisture and temperature were enhanced at both the gap center and edge following gap creation. Canopy gaps reduced Corg and Nt at both the gap center and gap edge while only enhanced Pt at the gap center. The NH4 + and NO3− increased at the gap center, and the available P and NH4 + increased at the gap edge following gap creation (Fig. 3c).
Short and medium-term canopy gaps increased soil moisture and soil temperature, whereas long-term canopy gaps exhibited diverse effects on them. Medium-term and long-term canopy gaps reduced Corg and Nt, and the short-term canopy gaps had no effect. Short-term canopy gaps increased Pt. Short-term and long-term canopy gaps increased available P and NO3−. Short-term, medium-term, and long-term canopy gaps enhanced NH4 + by 16.0%, 10.5%, and 66.9%, respectively. Medium-term and long-term canopy gaps reduced Cmic and Nmic, and long-term canopy gaps had a negative effect on Pmic (Fig. 4a).
Small and medium gaps decreased and increased the soil pH, respectively, whereas large gaps had no effect. Soil moisture and temperature notably increased while Corg decreased in each gap size class. Small and large gaps reduced Nt by 16.9% and 8.5%, respectively, and medium gaps showed a positive effect on Pt. The NH4 + was enhanced in each gap size class. The NO3− and available P were enhanced in medium and small gaps, respectively. The Ox-EEAs significantly reduced in small and medium gaps but increased in large gaps. The Cmic decreased in large gaps, and Nmic decreased in each gap size class (Fig. 4b).
3.3 Correlations between the changes in soil carbon content and nutrient availability
The result of network analysis showed that changes in soil moisture, Corg, Nt, NO3− and Cmic were the critical indicators closely associated with most of the other soil physical, chemical, and microbial properties (Fig. 5). Specifically, the change in soil moisture was significantly and positively related to the changes in Corg, Nt, available P, and NO3−, and was negatively associated with the changes in NH4 + and the Ox-EEAs. The change in Corg was significantly and positively related to the changes in Nt, Pt, C:N, available P, and Nmic, and the most pronounced correlation was found between changes in Corg and Nt. The changes in Nt and Nmic were positively correlated. The change in NO3− was negatively correlated with the change in Nt and NH4+. The change in Pt was negatively correlated with the change in Hy-EEAs. The changes in Hy-EEAs and Ox-EEAs were positively correlated. The change in Cmic was significantly and positively correlated with the changes in Pmic and Cmic:Nmic.
3.4 Correlations between climatic variables and the changes in soil properties
The changes in NH4 +, Hy-EEAs, Ox-EEAs, and Cmic showed a positive correlation with MAT (Fig. 6a, c-e). The change in available P decreased with increasing MAT (Fig. 6). The changes in Corg, available P, and Pmic decreased with increasing MAP (Fig. 6f-h). The changes in soil temperature, Corg, Nt, and Ox-EEAs increased with increasing UV radiation (Fig. 6i-k, m). The change in available P, Pmic, and Cmic:Nmic decreased with increasing UV radiation (Fig. 6l, n, o). The correlations between climatic variables and the changes in soil carbon content and nutrient availability are detailed in Figs. 13–15 in Appendix.
3.5 Key factors that regulate the changes in soil carbon content and nutrient availability in canopy gaps
The random forest analysis suggested that the most important factors associated with the change in Corg were the changes in Nt and Nmic. The changes in Cmic, available P, and Ox-EEAs were dominant factors regulating the change in NH4+. The changes in Nmic, available P, and pH were the dominant factors regulating the change in NO3−. However, the importance of the changes in influencing factors for Cmic and available P was relatively low (Fig. 7).
The explanation of PLS-PM for the variance in the response of soil carbon content was at the medium level (GoF = 0.42). The PLS-PM showed that no correlation was detected between climate (including mean annual temperature (MAT) and UV radiation) and the change in carbon content (including Corg). Climate negatively affects the change in basic soil characteristics (including soil moisture; path coefficient = -0.22, p < 0.05), while positively affecting the change in total nutrients (including Nt; path coefficient = 0.15, p < 0.05) and the change in microbial characteristics (including Hy-EEAs and Ox-EEAs; path coefficient = 0.23, p < 0.05). The change in basic soil characteristics had no association with the change in carbon content (path coefficient = 0.02, p > 0.05) but positively affected the change in total nutrients (path coefficient = 0.21, p < 0.05). The change in total nutrients positively affected the change in carbon content (path coefficient = 0.85, p < 0.05). The variance in the change in carbon content was explained by 74% with climate and changes in basic soil characteristics, total nutrients, and microbial characteristics (Fig. 8a).
Otherwise, the explanation of PLS-PM for the variance in the response of soil nutrient availability was at a relatively low level (GoF = 0.17). No correlations were detected between climate (including MAT and UV radiation) and the changes in nutrient availability (including NH4+ and NO3−), soil basic characteristics (including soil temperature), and total nutrients (including C:N). Climate negatively affected the change in microbial characteristics (including Pmic and Hy-EEAs; path coefficient = -0.14, p < 0.05). The change in total nutrients negatively affected the changes in microbial characteristics (path coefficient = -0.18, p < 0.05) and nutrient availability (path coefficient = -0.21, p < 0.05). The variance in the change in nutrient availability was explained by just 7% with climate and changes in basic soil characteristics, total nutrients, and microbial characteristics (Fig. 8b).
4 Discussion
4.1 Canopy gaps reduced soil carbon content
Effectively mitigating climate change may be achieved through the enhancement of forest carbon stocks resulting from sustainable forest management (Huang et al. 2023). Nevertheless, our results underscored a consistent reduction in both Corg and Cmic following gap creation, indicating a potential decline in the soil carbon stock (Ni et al. 2016; Amolikondori et al. 2020). In general, heightened levels of irradiance and soil temperature resulting from gap creation or forest thinning accelerated soil microbial activity, leading to increased soil respiration and, consequently, enhanced mineralization of soil organic matter and elevated surface carbon efflux (Scharenbroch and Bockheim 2008) (Fig. 9). Therefore, the distinct effects of gap formation and forest thinning on soil carbon stock might be attributed to the reduced initial carbon input, which could be potentially caused by tree mortality during natural gap formation and litter removal after selective logging. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the increased plant diversity resulting from gap creation is likely to enhance soil carbon storage over the long term (Degen et al. 2005; Lange et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2018; Jia et al. 2021).
Corg is an integral component of the forest carbon pool, and its active organic carbon fraction not only plays a crucial role in the soil carbon turnover process but also serves as a sensitive indicator of changes in climate conditions (Zhu et al. 2020; Pravalie et al. 2021). Cmic plays a vital role in ecosystem functioning by serving as the supply and inventory of effective soil nutrient resources (Singh and Gupta 2018; Li et al. 2019). Our results showed that Corg and Cmic declined significantly following gap creation, which might be attributed to the heightened mineralization of soil organic matter mineralization brought by increasing soil microbial activity. Furthermore, the diminished input of readily available carbon sources, such as root exudates, might result in microbial carbon limitation, which was substantiated by our discovery that Cmic:Nmic decreased significantly following gap creation (Panchal et al. 2022). Nevertheless, despite the absence of a significant correlation between the response of Corg and Cmic to canopy gap disturbance, and the relatively modest reduction in Cmic compared to Corg, several potential factors may explain these observations. On the one hand, the inadequate input of plant and microbial residues led to a notable reduction in the Corg pool, thereby limiting the favorable impact of warming on soil microbial respiration in the warmed-up plots. On the other hand, microorganisms adapted to the rising temperature in external environment by producing enzymes with heightened thermal adaptation, ultimately contributing to the gradual stabilization of the microbial biomass pool.
Furthermore, we evaluated the effects of canopy gap attributes and spatiotemporal factors on the response of soil carbon content to canopy gap disturbance. Corg and Cmic displayed consistent responses to canopy gap creation. For instance, the results showed a remarkable reduction in Corg and Cmic in medium-term (4–10 years) and long-term (> 10 years) canopy gaps and no significant change in short-term (≤ 3 years) canopy gaps. These differences might arise from large amount of readily available carbon released from the remaining litterfall induced by increased light and temperature during the early stage of gap formation (Wang et al. 2015, 2021). Notably, significant decreases in Corg and Cmic occurred in the non-growing and growing seasons, respectively. This result might be attributed to the lower supplementation of root exudates during the non-growing season. In contrast, soil microbial respiration maintained a higher level in the growing season. Overall, the downward trend in soil carbon stock following gap creation might be attributed to variations in initial carbon input between canopy gaps and forest understory sites.
4.2 Canopy gaps enhanced soil nutrient availability
The efficient recycling of nutrients plays a crucial role in determining availability of nutrients in forest ecosystems. Typically, natural disturbances or partial harvesting practices that expedite nutrient recycling through the creation of canopy gaps also tend to enhance the spatial variability in soil nutrient availability (Prescott 2002; Thiel and Perakis 2009; Xu et al. 2016). In the present study, there was a notable improvement in soil nitrogen availability following gap creation, as evidenced by a significant enhancement in NH4+ and NO3− concentrations, consistent with the findings from similar previous studies (Thiel and Perakis 2009; Kucera et al. 2020). This result could be primarily attributed to the reduction in nutrient uptake by vegetation, as well as a decrease in carbon inputs from litter and root exudation, which induced a decrease in nitrogen assimilation by soil microbial biomass. Meanwhile, the increase in soil microbial activity facilitated nitrogen mineralization from soil microbial biomass, predominantly during the growing season and in the mineral layer.
The elevation of soil moisture levels had both negative and positive effects on the subsequent increase in NH4+ and NO3− following gap creation. This indicated that maintaining an appropriate soil moisture level may accelerate soil nitrification (Chen et al. 2015; Osborne et al. 2016). Furthermore, our study revealed a significant enhancement in NO3− concentration following gap creation. This suggested that soil denitrification might decline and be primarily influenced by soil moisture, temperature, and C:N (Bremner and Shaw 1958; Elrys et al. 2021; Pan et al. 2022).
Our study detected a notable decrease in Nt and Nmic following gap creation, with this decline becoming more pronounced as gap age and size increased. This reduction might be attributed to the decrease in organic nitrogen, which severed as the primary nitrogen source of plants and microorganisms through litter nutrient return and root nutrient release. This, in turn, seemed to pose challenges in maintaining the soil nitrogen pool (Wu et al. 2022). Furthermore, our observations revealed a positive correlation between the changes in Nt and Nmic. This implied that microbial biomass, acting as a source of bioavailable nitrogen, played a pivotal role in predicting the spatiotemporal fluctuations within the soil nitrogen pool (Miltner et al. 2012; Daly et al. 2021).
The primary source of phosphorus in forest soil is derived from rock weathering (Kolowith and Berner 2002; Eger et al. 2018). We observed a noteworthy rise in Pt following gap creation, a trend in line with other forestry practices, such as thinning (Tian et al. 2019; Zhou et al. 2021). This increase might be attributed to the improved soil temperature and moisture levels resulting from gap creation, which in turn expedited the migration of phosphorus from the subsoil to the topsoil. Meanwhile, a notable positive correlation was observed between enhancement of Pt and available P, indicating the crucial role of phosphorus migration in the soil phosphate supply. The microbial biomass could serve as a potential resource or reservoir of available plant nutrients under specific environmental conditions (Singh et al. 1989; Wardle et al. 2004; Sugito et al. 2010). This study observed a significant increase in available P and a simultaneous decrease in Pmic following gap creation. As mentioned earlier, the decrease in plant nutrient uptake might contribute to the rise in available P. Simultaneously, the insufficient substrate supply, resulting from reduced litter nutrient return and root nutrient release, could lead to a decline in microbial biomass. Additionally, the increased soil moisture might enhance phosphorus availability, likely achieved by promoting soil microbial activity (Gomoryova et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2023).
Enzyme activity serves as a crucial indicator of soil biological activity and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems, with its alternation dependent on the initial soil nutrient and water status (Gomez et al. 2020; Levakov et al. 2021). This study observed a significant decline in Ox-EEAs following gap creation, potentially attributable to reduced soil nutrient supply. Furthermore, the decrease in Ox-EEAs exhibited a negative correlation with the increase in soil moisture, suggesting improved soil moisture conditions alleviated the reduction in soil enzyme activity. Overall, soil available nutrients were enhanced following gap creation, aligning with similar findings reported in the literature regarding the impact of global forest recovery on soil fertility (Zhou et al. 2022).
4.3 Effects of climate conditions on the changes in soil carbon content and nutrient availability
It is well-documented that changes in climate conditions have far-reaching impacts on carbon sink and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems (Fung et al. 2005; Elrys et al. 2021; Margalef et al. 2021). A recent study reported a global reduction in the forest recovery effect on soil carbon sink and soil fertility due to joint changes in temperature and rainfall (Zhou et al. 2022). In the present study, we examined the influence of climate condition changes on the dynamics of soil carbon content and available nutrients following gap creation (Figs. 13, 14 and 15 in Appendix). The results indicated that temperature generally attenuated the effects of canopy gaps on the soil carbon content and available nutrients. Conversely, precipitation enhanced the canopy gap effects, aligning partially with the findings of Zhou et al. (2022).
Specifically, our observations indicated that the elevated MAP mitigated the decline in Corg and Pmic, as well as the increase in available P (Fig. 14 in Appendix). These findings suggested that heavy precipitation might have constrained both soil microbial respiration and the transformation of Pmic into available P. The rise in MAT intensified the decrease in Cmic (Fig. 13 in Appendix). This phenomenon might be attributed to the carbon losses in the soil induced by warming, as explained by the mechanism of substrate depletion (Walker et al. 2018). In addition, the elevated MAT also amplified the increase in NH4+, possibly due to the plant exhibiting heightened nutrient uptake at elevated temperatures.
Solar radiation is intricately linked to plant photosynthesis and nutrient stoichiometry, garnering heightened attention for its impact on biogeochemical cycling in recent studies (Epp et al. 2007; Ji et al. 2020; Barnes et al. 2023). In the current investigation, we evaluated the influence of UV radiation on the dynamics of both the physical and chemical properties of the soil following gap creation (Fig. 15 in Appendix). Previous studies have consistently demonstrated that the formation of canopy gaps significantly elevates soil temperature, primarily due to the increased solar radiation reaching the forest floor (Wang et al. 2022). Our study further observed a pronounced enhancement in soil temperature caused by UV radiation, potentially resulting in a more substantial impact on soil microbial respiration.
We observed that UV radiation enhanced the negative effects of canopy gaps on Corg and Nt, possibly due to an enhancement in soil microbial respiration. Likewise, our findings revealed that UV radiation facilitated a reduction in Ox-EEAs by instigating substantial losses in soil organic matter. In contrast, it was observed that UV radiation reduced the positive effects of canopy gaps on available P, as well as the negative effects on Pmic, suggesting that UV radiation might play a crucial role in regulating phosphorus cycling through the modulation of soil phosphorus-related enzyme activities, such as soil acid phosphatase. Meanwhile, we found that the increase in Cmic:Nmic was negatively associated with UV radiation, implying that high solar radiation could mitigate microbial nitrogen limitation to some extent.
4.4 Study limitations and management implications
While we have endeavored to offer a comprehensive understanding of the effects of canopy gaps on soil carbon content and nutrient availability through a global meta-analysis, there remain several potential limitations. Firstly, the sampled studies do not encompass the full spectrum of global forests, focusing primarily on eastern forests. Therefore, further research spanning a broader range of forest biomes, especially boreal and tropical forests, is imperative to ascertain the generality of our findings. Secondly, the analysis overlooks vital information regarding the surrounding gaps of trees. For example, tree height correlates with the angle of incoming solar radiation, and the crown radius is associated with gap edge effect. Thirdly, this study lacks direct evidence to elucidate potential mechanisms, particularly the responses of soil microorganisms after gap creation. Finally, previous research confirms the close association between biodiversity and soil nutrient availability. However, information regarding the variation in the gap-making species is not recorded in the present meta-analysis.
Our study has significant implications for sustainable forest management. Firstly, it highlights the pronounced effects of canopy gaps on the soil carbon sequestration, nutrient availability, and their interconnectedness with climate conditions. Consequently, integrating the canopy gap effect into spatially explicit models is crucial for achieving a comprehensive understanding of carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation (O'Connor 2008; Forsius et al. 2021). Secondly, this study has significantly contributed to a comprehensive understanding of the effects of canopy gaps on soil carbon and nutrients. This, in turn, facilitates more accurate predictions of forest succession in the future. With the growing popularity of close-to-nature forest management, the implementation of small-scale harvests and artificial canopy gaps is poised to play crucial roles in restoration of low-quality secondary forests and monoculture plantations (Fig. 16 in Appendix). Thirdly, prior studies have emphasized the necessity of sustainable forest management for climate change adaptation (Canadell and Raupach 2008; Liu et al. 2013; Keenan 2015). Our study contributes valuable information regarding the impacts of changes in climate conditions on soil carbon content and nutrient availability after the creation of canopy gaps. This information is crucial for the implementation of artificial canopy gaps in forest management under current and future climate conditions.
5 Conclusions
The occurrence of canopy gaps was found to decrease soil carbon content while simultaneously increasing nutrient availability in the topsoil layer of forest ecosystems. These changes became more pronounced with the age and size of canopy gaps. The alteration in soil moisture level following gap creation might serve as a crucial driver of the response of soil carbon pool and nutrient availability. Precipitation and temperature played negative and positive roles, respectively, in influencing the soil carbon content and nutrient availability. Additionally, UV radiation exhibited a positive regulatory effect on the response of soil carbon and nitrogen components, while playing a negative regulatory role in the response of phosphorus components. In summary, this study sheds light on the significant roles played by canopy gaps in regulating carbon stock dynamics and nutrient biogeochemical cycles in forest ecosystems. The findings have noteworthy implications for ecological restoration and fine-scale regulation of forest structure.
6 Appendix
Text 1. List of the 52 papers from which the data were extracted for this meta-analysis.
-
1.
Wang, B., Li, Z., Huang, S., Yuan, Y., Zhang, Y., & Qin, Y. (2021). Effects of selective cutting of forest trees on content of soil nutrient in mushroom-cultivated stand. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 41(2), 1-7. (In Chinese)
-
2.
Jia, G., Xu, Q., Yang, H., Yang, Q., Li, Y., & Liu, W. (2020). soil methane flux of tropical mountain rainforest canopu gaps in Jianfengling, Hainan Island. Journal of Forest and Environment, 40(2), 126-132. (In Chinese)
-
3.
Han, M., Tang, M., Shi, B., & Jin, G. (2020). Effect of canopy gap size on soil respiration in a mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest: Evidence from biotic and abiotic factors. European Journal of Soil Biology, 99, 103194.
-
4.
Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, W., Wu, F., Xu, Z., Tan, B., Zhang, L., He, X., Guo, L. (2018). Canopy gaps accelerate soil organic carbon retention by soil microbial biomass in the organic horizon in a subalpine fir forest. Applied Soil Ecology, 125, 169-176.
-
5.
Yu, X., Yang, L., Fei, S., Ma, Z., Hao, R., & Zhao, Z. (2018). Effect of soil layer and plant–soil interaction on soil microbial diversity and function after canopy gap disturbance. Forests, 9(11), 680.
-
6.
Lyu, Q., Liu, J., Liu, J., Luo, Y., Chen, L., Chen, G., Zhao, K., Chen, Y., Fan, C., Li, X. (2021). Response of plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties to different gap sizes in a Pinus massoniana plantation. PeerJ, 9, e12222.
-
7.
Wang, X., Liu, J., He, Z., Wu, Z., Jiang, L., Zhu, J., Xing, C., Gu, X. (2020). Seasonal dynamics of functional diversity of soil microbial communities in Castanopsis kawakamii forest gaps. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 42(7), 77-88.
-
8.
Tang, F., Quan, W., Li, C., Huang, X., Wu, X., Yang, Q., Pan, Y., Xu, T., Qian, C., Gu, Y. (2019). Effects of small gaps on the relationship among soil properties, topography, and plant species in subtropical Rhododendron secondary forest, southwest China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(11), 1919.
-
9.
Song, S., Zhang, D., Zhang, J., Yang, W., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Li, X. (2107). Edge effects of forest gap in Pinus massoniana plantations on the ecological stoichiometry of Cinnamomum longepaniculatum. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41(10), 1081-1090.
-
10.
Amolikondori, A., Vajari, K. A., Feizian, M., & Iorio, A. D. (2020). Influences of forest gaps on soil physico-chemical and biological properties in an oriental beech (Fagus orientalis L.) stand of Hyrcanian forest, north of Iran. iForest, 13, 124-129.
-
11.
Arunachalam, A., & Arunachalam, K. (2000). Influence of gap size and soil properties on microbial biomass in a subtropical humid forest of north-east India. Plant and Soil, 223(1), 187-195.
-
12.
Schliemann, S., & Bockheim, J. (2014). Influence of gap size on carbon and nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in Northern hardwood forests of the Upper Peninsula, Michigan. Plant and Soil, 377, 323-335.
-
13.
Muscolo, A., Sidari, M., & Mercurio, R. (2007). Influence of gap size on organic matter decomposition, microbial biomass and nutrient cycle in Calabrian pine (Pinus laricio, Poiret) stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 242(2-3), 412-418.
-
14.
Hu, W. J., Wang, P. C., Zhang, Y., Teng, M., & Zhou, Z. X. (2016). Effect of gap disturbances on soil properties and understory plant diversity in a pinus massoniana plantation in hubei, central China. 26, 988-1001.
-
15.
Bagnato, S., Marziliano, P. A., Sidari, M., Mallamaci, C., Marra, F., & Muscolo, A. (2021). Effects of gap size and cardinal directions on natural regeneration, growth dynamics of trees outside the gaps and soil properties in european beech forests of southern Italy. Forests, 12(11), 1563.
-
16.
Muscolo, A., Sidari, M., & Mercurio, R. (2007). Variations in soil chemical properties and microbial biomass in artificial gaps in silver fir stands. European Journal of Forest Research, 126(1), 59-65.
-
17.
Coulombe, D., Sirois, L., & Paré, D. (2017). Effect of harvest gap formation and thinning on soil nitrogen cycling at the boreal–temperate interface. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 47(3), 308-318.
-
18.
Shen, Y., Yang, W., Zhang, J., Xu, Z., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Li, H., You C., Tan, B. (2019). Forest gap size alters the functional diversity of soil nematode communities in alpine forest ecosystems. Forests, 10(9), 806.
-
19.
Wang, X., Liu, J., He, Z., Xing, C., Zhu, J., Gu, X., Lan, Y., Wu, Z., Liao, P., Zhu, D. (2021). Forest gaps mediate the structure and function of the soil microbial community in a Castanopsis kawakamii forest. Ecological Indicators, 122, 107288.
-
20.
Hu, B., Yang, B., Pang, X., Bao, W., & Tian, G. (2016). Responses of soil phosphorus fractions to gap size in a reforested spruce forest. Geoderma, 279, 61-69.
-
21.
Perreault, L., Forrester, J. A., Wurzburger, N., & Mladenoff, D. J. (2020). Emergent properties of downed woody debris in canopy gaps: A response of the soil ecosystem to manipulation of forest structure. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 151, 108053.
-
22.
Liu, Q., Sterck, F. J., Medina-Vega, J. A., Sha, L.-Q., Cao, M., Bongers, F., Zhang, J., Poorter, L. (2021). Soil nutrients, canopy gaps and topography affect liana distribution in a tropical seasonal rain forest in southwestern China. Journal of Vegetation Science, 32(1), e12951.
-
23.
Yang, B., Pang, X., Hu, B., Bao, W., & Tian, G. (2017). Does thinning-induced gap size result in altered soil microbial community in pine plantation in eastern Tibetan Plateau? Ecology and Evolution, 7(9), 2986-2993.
-
24.
Sariyildiz, T. (2008). Effects of gap-size classes on long-term litter decomposition rates of beech, oak and chestnut species at high elevations in northeast Turkey. Ecosystems, 11(6), 841-853.
-
25.
Xu, J., Lie, G., & Xue, L. (2016). Effects of gap size on diversity of soil fauna in a Cunninghamia lanceolata stand damaged by an ice storm in southern China. Journal of Forestry Research, 27(6), 1427-1434.
-
26.
Ogden, A. E., & Schmidt, M. G. (1997). Litterfall and soil characteristics in canopy gaps occupied by vine maple in a coastal western hemlock forest. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 77(4), 703-711.
-
27.
Xu, J., Lie, G., & Xue, L. (2016). Effects of gap size on diversity of soil fauna in a Cunninghamia lanceolata stand damaged by an ice storm in southern China. Journal of Forestry Research, 27(6), 1427-1434.
-
28.
Li, D., Li, X., Su, Y., Li, X., Yin, H., Li, X., Guo, M., He, Y. (2019). Forest gaps influence fungal community assembly in a weeping cypress forest. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 103(7), 3215-3224.
-
29.
Zou, G., Liu, Y., Kong, F., Liao, L., Deng, G., Jiang, X., Cai, J., Liu, W. (2021). Depression of the soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community by the canopy gaps in a Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) plantation on Lushan Mountain, subtropical China. PeerJ, 9.
-
30.
Iimura, Y., Hirota, M., Ida, H., & Ohtsuka, T. (2013). Comparison of quantity and quality of soil organic carbon between matured and gap areas in an old-growth beech forest. Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), 122(4), 723-732.
-
31.
Scharenbroch, B. C., & Bockheim, J. G. (2008). Gaps and soil C dynamics in old growth northern hardwood–hemlock forests. Ecosystems, 11(3), 426-441. 10.1007/s10021-008-9131-6.
-
32.
Griffiths, R., Gray, A., & Spies, T. (2009). Soil properties in old-growth douglas-fir forest gaps in the western Cascade Mountains of Oregon. Northwest Science, 84, 33-45.
-
33.
Mayer, M., Matthews, B., Rosinger, C., Sandén, H., Godbold, D. L., & Katzensteiner, K. (2017). Tree regeneration retards decomposition in a temperate mountain soil after forest gap disturbance. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 115, 490-498.
-
34.
Ritter, E. (2005). Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in newly formed gaps in a Danish beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37(7), 1237-1247.
-
35.
Kučera, A., Holik, L., Cerro, E. M., & Petříček, J. (2020). Effect of gap size and forest type on mineral nitrogen forms under different soil properties. Journal of Forestry Research, 31(2), 375-386.
-
36.
Yang, D. (2017). Effect of forest gap on soil microbial community structureand enzyme activity under Pinus tabulaeformis plantation. (Doctor), NorthwestA&F University, Xi'an. (In Chinese)
-
37.
Fei, F. (2015). Effect of gap size on soil microbial biomass and soil enzyme activity. (Master), Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing. (In Chinese)
-
38.
Jiang, Q., Yao, J., Wu, X., Hao, J., Pei, Z., Li, T., Shi, B., Zhang, B., Qi, J. (2018). Effects of size of gaps in Cryptomeria fortunei plantation on soil physicochemical properties and species diversity in zhougong mountain. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 34(4), 326-332. (In Chinese)
-
39.
Xiao, J., Zhang, W., Yu, L., & Yang, K. (2017). Effects of gap size on soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in a secondary forest in a montane region of eastern Liaoning Province, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 36(11), 3043-3048. (In Chinese)
-
40.
Wei, D., Zhang, D., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Li, B., & Zhang, J. (2017). Dynamics of leaf litter and mineral soil nutrients in different sized Pinus massoniana forest gaps. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 37(1), 128-138. (In Chinese)
-
41.
Ou, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Cui, N., Zhang, j., Li, J., Song, X., Deng, C. (2015). Early responses of soil ammonium and nitrate nitrogen to forest gap harvesting of a Pinus massoniana plantation in the upper reaches of yangtze river. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 21(1), 147-154. (In Chinese)
-
42.
Zhou, Y., Hao, K., Li, X., Fan, C., Chen, L., Liu, Y., & Wang, X. (2014). Effects of forest gap on seasonal dynamics of soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in Picea asperata forest in Miyaluo of Western Sichuan, Southwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25(9), 2469-2476. (In Chinese)
-
43.
Li, Z., Wu, F., Yang, W., Xu, Z., Gou, X., Xiong, L., Yin, R., Huang, L. (2015). Soil invertase and urease activities at different periods in subalpine forest gap in western Sichuan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(12), 3919-3925. (In Chinese)
-
44.
Ou, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Cui, N., Deng, C., Ji, W., He, R. (2014). Early influence of forest gap harvesting on soil phosphorus in Pinus massoniana plantation in a hilly area of the reaches of Yangtze River. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 33(3), 592-601. (In Chinese)
-
45.
Han, W., He, J., Zhang, W., & Li, J. (2013). Effects of gap size on root growth of seedlings and soil physical and chemical properties in Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in the Huanglong forest. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 49(11), 16-23. (In Chinese)
-
46.
Liu, C., Zhu, J., Wu, X., & Kai, Y. (2011). Characteristics of soil nutrients within canopy gaps of various sizes in secondary forests in eastern mountainous regions of Liaoning Province,China. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 39(1), 79-81. (In Chinese)
-
47.
Wang, C., Pang, X., & Bao, W. (2010). Short term effects of low intensity thinning simulated by gap on ground microclimate and soil nutrients of pure spruce plantation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21(3), 541-548. (In Chinese)
-
48.
Sha, L., & Cao, M. (1999). Nutrients in treefall gap of tropical seasonal rainforest in Xishuangbanna. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 27(6), 78-80. (In Chinese)
-
49.
Liu, S., Duan, W., Zhong, C., Chen, L., & Wang, L. (2012). Dynamic changes in soil temperature, water content, nutrition and microorganisms of differnt size gaps in the mixed broadleaved Korean pine forest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 26(5), 78-89. (In Chinese)
-
50.
Zhang, C. Y., Zhao, X. H., & Zheng, J. M. (2006). A study on soil properties in forest gaps and under canopy in broadleaved Pinus koriensis forest in Changbai Mountain. Forest Research. 19(3): 347-352. (In Chinese)
-
51.
Zhou, G. (2021). Influence of wind-fall gap of Robina pseudoacacia plantation on microhabitat and its regeneration. (Master), Shandong Agriculatural University, Tai'an. (In Chinese)
-
52.
Thiel, A. L., & Perakis, S. S. (2009). Nitrogen dynamics across silvicultural canopy gaps in young forests of western Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management, 258(3), 273-287.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Figshare repository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24038883.v3.
References
Ackerly D (2003) Canopy gaps to climate change-extreme events, ecology and evolution. New Phytol 160:2–4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00888.x
Amolikondori A, Abrari Vajari K, Feizian M, Di Iorio A (2020) Influences of forest gaps on soil physico-chemical and biological properties in an oriental beech (Fagus orientalis L) stand of Hyrcanian forest, north of Iran. iForest 13:124–129. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3205-013
Amolikondori A, Abrari Vajari K, Feizian M (2022) Assessing soil organic carbon, N and P stocks and its relation to soil properties in artificial canopy gaps in a managed oriental beech (Fagus orientalis L.) forest. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 185:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202100425
Barnes PW, Robson TM, Zepp RG, Bornman JF, Jansen MAK, Ossola R, Wang QW, Robinson SA, Foereid B, Klekociuk AR, Martinez-Abaigar J, Hou WC, Mackenzie R, Paul ND (2023) Interactive effects of changes in UV radiation and climate on terrestrial ecosystems, biogeochemical cycles, and feedbacks to the climate system. Photoch Photobio Sci 22:1049–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-023-00376-7
Beckmann M, Vaclavik T, Manceur AM, Sprtova L, von Wehrden H, Welk E, Cord AF (2014) glUV: a global UV-B radiation data set for macroecological studies. Methods Ecol Evol 5:372–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12168
Bremner JM, Shaw K (1958) Denitrification in soil. II. Factors Affecting Denitrification. J Agr Sci 51:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600032779
Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science (new York, NY) 320:1456–1457. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155458
Chen ZM, Ding WX, Xu YH, Muller C, Rutting T, Yu HY, Fan JL, Zhang JB, Zhu TB (2015) Importance of heterotrophic nitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium in a cropland soil: evidences from a N-15 tracing study to literature synthesis. Soil Biol Biochem 91:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.026
Chen SP, Wang WT, Xu WT, Wang Y, Wan HW, Chen DM, Tang ZY, Tang XL, Zhou GY, Xie ZQ, Zhou DW, Shangguan ZP, Huang JH, He JS, Wang YF, Sheng JD, Tang LS, Li XR, Dong M, Wu Y, Wang QF, Wang ZH, Wu JG, Chapin FS, Bai YF (2018) Plant diversity enhances productivity and soil carbon storage. P Natl Acad Sci USA 115:4027–4032. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700298114
Chen LJ, Jiang YJ, Liang C, Luo Y, Xu QS, Han C, Zhao QG, Sun B (2019) Competitive interaction with keystone taxa induced negative priming under biochar amendments. Microbime 7:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0693-7
Daly AB, Jilling A, Bowles TM, Buchkowski RW, Frey SD, Kallenbach CM, Keiluweit M, Mooshammer M, Schimel JP, Grandy AS (2021) A holistic framework integrating plant-microbe-mineral regulation of soil bioavailable nitrogen. Biogeochemistry 154:211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-021-00793-9
Dechnik-Vazquez YA, Meave JA, Perez-Garcia EA, Gallardo-Cruz JA, Romero-Romero MA (2016) The effect of treefall gaps on the understorey structure and composition of the tropical dry forest of Nizanda, Oaxaca, Mexico: implications for forest regeneration. J Trop Ecol 32:89–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467416000092
Degen T, Devillez F, Jacquemart AL (2005) Gaps promote plant diversity in beech forests (Luzulo-Fagetum), North Vosges, France. Ann Forest Sci 62:429–440. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005039
dos Santos LT, Magnabosco Marra D, Trumbore S, de Camargo PB, Negrón-Juárez RI, Lima AJN, Ribeiro GHPM, dos Santos J, Higuchi N (2016) Windthrows increase soil carbon stocks in a Central Amazon forest. Biogeosciences 13:1299–1308. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1299-2016
Eger A, Yoo K, Almond PC, Boitt G, Larsen IJ, Condron LM, Wang X, Mudd SM (2018) Does soil erosion rejuvenate the soil phosphorus inventory? Geoderma 332:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.06.021
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Brit Med J 315:629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Elrys AS, Wang J, Metwally MAS, Cheng Y, Zhang JB, Cai ZC, Chang SX, Muller C (2021) Global gross nitrification rates are dominantly driven by soil carbon-to-nitrogen stoichiometry and total nitrogen. Global Change Biol 27:6512–6524. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15883
Epp RG, Erickson DJ, Paul ND, Sulzberger B (2007) Interactive effects of solar UV radiation and climate change on biogeochemical cycling. Photoch Photobio Sci 6:286–300. https://doi.org/10.1039/b700021a
Eysenrode D, Kockelbergh F, Bogaert J, Impens I, Hecke P (2002) Canopy gap edge determination and the importance of gap edges for plant diversity. Web Ecol 3:1–5. https://doi.org/10.5194/we-3-1-2002
Fahey RT, Puettmann KJ (2008) Patterns in spatial extent of gap influence on understory plant communities. Forest Ecol Manag 255:2801–2810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.053
Forsius M, Kujala H, Minunno F, Holmberg M, Leikola N, Mikkonen N, Autio I, Paunu V-V, Tanhuanpää T, Hurskainen P, Mäyrä J, Kivinen S, Keski-Saari S, Kosenius A-K, Kuusela S, Virkkala R, Viinikka A, Vihervaara P, Akujärvi A, Heikkinen R (2021) Developing a spatially explicit modelling and evaluation framework for integrated carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation: application in southern Finland. Sci Total Environ 775:145847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145847
Fung IY, Doney SC, Lindsay K, John J (2005) Evolution of carbon sinks in a changing climate. P Natl Acad Sci USA 102:11201–11206. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504949102
Galhidy L, Mihok B, Hagyo A, Rajkai K, Standovar T (2006) Effects of gap size and associated changes in light and soil moisture on the understorey vegetation of a Hungarian beech forest. Plant Ecol 183:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-9012-4
Gomez EJ, Delgado JA, Gonzalez JM (2020) Environmental factors affect the response of microbial extracellular enzyme activity in soils when determined as a function of water availability and temperature. Ecol Evol 10:10105–10115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6672
Gomoryova E, Gregor J, Pichler V, Gomory D (2006) Spatial patterns of soil microbial characteristics and soil moisture in a natural beech forest. Biologia 61:S329–S333. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0183-9
Gough CM, Bohrer G, Hardiman BS, Nave LE, Vogel CS, Atkins JW, Bond-Lamberty B, Fahey RT, Fotis AT, Grigri MS, Haber LT, Yang J, Kleinke CL, Mathes KC, Nadelhoffer KJ, Ellen S-H, Curtis PS (2021) Disturbance-accelerated succession increases the production of a temperate forest. Ecol Appl 31:e02417. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2417
Gray AN, Spies TA, Easter MJ (2002) Microclimatic and soil moisture responses to gap formation in coastal Douglas-fir forests. Can J Forest Res 32:332–343. https://doi.org/10.1139/X01-200
Griffiths HM, Eggleton P, Hemming-Schroeder N, Swinfield T, Woon JS, Allison SD, Coomes DA, Ashton LA, Parr CL (2021) Carbon flux and forest dynamics: increased deadwood decomposition in tropical rainforest tree-fall canopy gaps. Global Change Biol 27:1601–1613. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15488
Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156. https://doi.org/10.2307/177062
Huang C, Li S, He HS, Liang Y, Xu WR, Wu MM, Wu ZW, Huang C, Chen FS (2023) Effects of forest management practices on carbon dynamics of China’s boreal forests under changing climates. J Environ Manage 335:117497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117497
Jayakrishnan KU, Bala G, Cao L, Caldeira K (2022) Contrasting climate and carbon-cycle consequences of fossil-fuel use versus deforestation disturbance. Environ Res Lett 17:064020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac69fd
Ji Y, Zhou P, Peng S, Huang B, Peng S, Zhou T (2020) A continental study of relationships between leaf N and P stoichiometry and solar radiation including its direct, diffuse, and spectral components. J Geophys Res Biogeo 125:e2020JG005747. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005747
Jia YF, Zhai GQ, Zhu SS, Liu XJ, Schmid B, Wang ZH, Ma KP, Feng XJ (2021) Plant and microbial pathways driving plant diversity effects on soil carbon accumulation in subtropical forest. Soil Biol Biochem 161:108375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108375
Joshi RK, Garkoti SC (2023) Effect of forest chronosequence on ecological stoichiometry and nitrogen and phosphorus stocks in Alnus nepalensis forest stands, central Himalaya. Land Degrad Dev 34:3769–3789. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4719
Keenan RJ (2015) Climate change impacts and adaptation in forest management: a review. Ann Forest Sci 72:145–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0446-5
Kelemen K, Mihok B, Galhidy L, Standovar T (2012) Dynamic response of herbaceous vegetation to gap opening in a central European beech stand. Sliva Fenn 46:53–65. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.65
Kneeshaw DD, Bergeron YJE (1998) Canopy gap characteristics and tree replacement in the southeastern boreal forest. Ecology 79:783–794. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0783:CGCATR]2.0.CO;2
Kolowith LC, Berner RA (2002) Weathering of phosphorus in black shales. Global Ecol Biogrogr 16:87. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001887
Kucera A, Holik L, Cerro EM, Petricek J (2020) Effect of gap size and forest type on mineral nitrogen forms under different soil properties J. Forestry Res 31:375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0822-3
Lange M, Eisenhauer N, Sierra CA, Bessler H, Engels C, Griffiths RI, Mellado-Vazquez PG, Malik AA, Roy J, Scheu S, Steinbeiss S, Thomson BC, Trumbore SE, Gleixner G (2015) Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nat Commun 6:6707. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7707
Levakov I, Ronen Z, Siebner H, Dahan O (2021) Continuous in-situ measurement of free extracellular enzyme activity as direct indicator for soil biological activity. Soil Biol Biochem 163:108448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108448
Li ZL, Tian DS, Wang BX, Wang JS, Wang S, Chen HYH, Xu XF, Wang CH, He NP, Niu SL (2019) Microbes drive global soil nitrogen mineralization and availability. Global Change Biol 25:1078–1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14557
Liu S, Innes J, Wei X (2013) Shaping forest management to climate change: an overview. Forest Ecol Manag 300:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.018
Liu XJ, Tan ND, Zhou GY, Zhang DQ, Zhang QM, Liu SZ, Chu GW, Liu JX (2021) Plant diversity and species turnover co-regulate soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability in Dinghushan forests, southern China. Plant Soil 464:257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04940-x
Long C, Yang X, Long W, Li D, Zhou W, Zhang H (2018) Soil nutrients influence plant community assembly in two tropical coastal secondary forests. Trop Conserv Sci 11:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082918817956
Lu D, Zhu J, Zhang G, Sun Y, Sun Y, Hu L, Wang GG (2023) Disentangling regeneration by vertical stratification: a 17-year gap-filling process in a temperate secondary forest. Forest Ecol Manag 539:120994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120994
Margalef O, Sardans J, Maspons J, Molowny-Horas R, Fernandez-Martinez M, Janssens IA, Richter A, Ciais P, Obersteiner M, Penuelas J (2021) The effect of global change on soil phosphatase activity. Global Change Biol 27:5989–6003. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15832
Mataji A, Vahedi AA (2021) Distribution attributes of natural canopy gaps in the Hyrcanian mixed-oriental beech forests. J For Sci 67:367–375. https://doi.org/10.17221/150/2020-JFS
McNab WH, Kilgo JC, Blake JI, Zarnoch SJ (2021) Effect of gap size on composition and structure of regeneration 19 years after harvest in a southeastern bottomland forest, USA. Can J Forest Res 51:380–392. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0181
Miltner A, Bombach P, Schmidt-Brucken B, Kastner M (2012) SOM genesis: microbial biomass as a significant source. Biogeochemistry 111:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9658-z
Muscolo A, Bagnato S, Sidari M, Mercurio R (2014) A review of the roles of forest canopy gaps. J Forestry Res 25:725–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0521-7
Ni X, Yang W, Tan B, Li H, He J, Xu L, Wu F (2016) Forest gaps slow the sequestration of soil organic matter: a humification experiment with six foliar litters in an alpine forest. Sci Rep-UK 6:19744. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19744
O’Connor D (2008) Governing the global commons: linking carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in tropical forests. Global Environ Chang 18:368–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.012
Osborne BB, Baron JS, Wallenstein MD (2016) Moisture and temperature controls on nitrification differ among ammonia oxidizer communities from three alpine soil habitats. Front Earth Sci-Prc 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-015-0556-x
Pan BB, Zhang YS, Xia LL, Lam SK, Hu HW, Chen DL (2022) Nitrous oxide production pathways in Australian forest soils. Geoderma 420:115871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115871
Panchal P, Preece C, Peñuelas J, Giri J (2022) Soil carbon sequestration by root exudates. Trends Plant Sci 27:749–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2022.04.009
Pollmann W (2002) Effects of natural disturbance and selective logging on Nothofagus forests in south-Central Chile. J Biogeogr 29:955–970. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00734.x
Pope CA, Cannon JB, Bigelow SW, Sharma A (2023) Effects of hurricane canopy gaps on longleaf pine and upland oak sapling growth. Forest Ecol Manag 529:120684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120684
Pravalie R, Nita IA, Patriche C, Niculita M, Birsan MV, Rosca B, Bandoc G (2021) Global changes in soil organic carbon and implications for land degradation neutrality and climate stability. Environ Res 201:111580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111580
Prescott CE (2002) The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree Physiol 22:1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.15-16.1193
Pugh TAM, Lindeskog M, Smith B, Poulter B, Arneth A, Haverd V, Calle L (2019) Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. P Natl Acad Sci USA 116:4382–4387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810512116
Ren S, Ali A, Liu H, Yuan Z, Yang Q, Shen G, Zhou S, Wang X (2021) Response of community diversity and productivity to canopy gap disturbance in subtropical forests. Forest Ecol Manag 502:119740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119740
Ritter E, Dalsgaard L, Eirthorn KS (2005) Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. Forest Ecol Manag 206:15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.08.011
Rosenberg MS (2005) The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution 59:464–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01004.x
Scharenbroch BC, Bockheim JG (2008) Gaps and soil C dynamics in old growth northern hardwood-hemlock forests. Ecosystems 11:426–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9131-6
Singh JS, Gupta VK (2018) Soil microbial biomass: a key soil driver in management of ecosystem functioning. Sci Total Environ 634:497–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.373
Singh JS, Raghubanshi AS, Singh RS, Srivastava SC (1989) Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrients in dry tropical forest and savanna. Nature 338:499–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/338499a0
Sugito T, Yoshida K, Takebe M, Shinano T, Toyota K (2010) Soil microbial biomass phosphorus as an indicator of phosphorus availability in a Gleyic andosol. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 56:390–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00483.x
Thiel AL, Perakis SS (2009) Nitrogen dynamics across silvicultural canopy gaps in young forests of western Oregon. Forest Ecol Manag 258:273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.015
Tian HX, Cheng XQ, Han HR, Jing HY, Liu XJ, Li ZZ (2019) Seasonal variations and thinning effects on soil phosphorus fractions in Larix principis-rupprechtii mayr. plantations. Forests 10:172. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020172
Tong R, Ji B, Wang GG, Lou C, Ma C, Yuan W, Zhu N, Wu T (2023) Canopy gap impacts on soil organic carbon and nutrient dynamic: A meta-analysis. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24038883.v3
Walker TWN, Kaiser C, Strasser F, Herbold CW, Leblans NIW, Woebken D, Janssens IA, Sigurdsson BD, Richter A (2018) Microbial temperature sensitivity and biomass change explain soil carbon loss with warming. Nat Clim Change 8:885–889. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0259-x
Wallace BC, Lajeunesse MJ, Dietz G, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA, Schmid CH, Gurevitch J (2017) OpenMEE: intuitive, open-source software for meta-analysis in ecology and evolutionary biology. Methods Ecol Evol 8:941–947. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12708
Wang J, Liu LL, Wang X, Chen YW (2015) The interaction between abiotic photodegradation and microbial decomposition under ultraviolet radiation. Global Change Biol 21:2095–2104. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12812
Wang QW, Pieriste M, Liu CG, Kenta T, Robson TM, Kurokawa H (2021) The contribution of photodegradation to litter decomposition in a temperate forest gap and understorey. New Phytol 229:2625–2636. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17022
Wang QW, Robson TM, Pieristè M, Kenta T, Zhou W, Kurokawa H (2022) Canopy structure and phenology modulate the impacts of solar radiation on C and N dynamics during litter decomposition in a temperate forest. Sci Total Environ 820:153185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153185
Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, Setala H, van der Putten WH, Wall DH (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science (new York, NY) 304:1629–1633. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094875
Weir CJ, Butcher I, Assi V, Lewis SC, Murray GD, Langhorne P, Brady MC (2018) Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 18:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0483-0
Wu A, Yin R, Xu Z, Zhang L, You C, Liu Y, Li H, Wang L, Liu S, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Tan B (2022) Forest gaps slow lignin and cellulose degradation of fir (Abies faxoniana) twig litter in an alpine forest. Geoderma 424:116010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116010
Xu JX, Xue L, Su ZY (2016) Impacts of forest gaps on soil properties after a severe ice storm in a Cunninghamia lanceolata stand. Pedosphere 26:408–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60053-4
Yamamoto SI (2000) Forest gap dynamics and tree regeneration. J Forest Res-Jpn 5:223–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767114
Yang JJ, Guan PT, Zhang P, Wu YA, Wang DL, Wu DH (2023) Stronger microbial nutrient limitations in subsoil along the precipitation gradient of agroecosystem: insights from soil enzyme activity and stoichiometry. Front Ecol Evol 11:1–35. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1137172
Zhang QS, Zak JC (1995) Effects of gap size on litter decomposition and microbial activity in a subtropical forest. Ecology 76:2196–2204. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941693
Zhou T, Wang CK, Zhou ZH (2021) Thinning promotes the nitrogen and phosphorous cycling in forest soils. Agr Forest Meteorol 311:108665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108665
Zhou GY, Zhou XH, Eldridge DJ, Han XM, Song YJ, Liu RQ, Zhou LY, He YH, Du ZG, Delgado-Baquerizo M (2022) Temperature and rainfall patterns constrain the multidimensional rewilding of global forests. Adv Sci 9:2201144. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202201144
Zhu JJ, Lu DL, Zhang WD (2014) Effects of gaps on regeneration of woody plants: a meta-analysis. J Forestry Res 25:501–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0489-3
Zhu JX, Wang CK, Zhou Z, Zhou GY, Hu XY, Jiang L, Li YD, Liu GH, Ji CJ, Zhao SQ, Li P, Zhu JL, Tang ZY, Zheng CY, Birdsey RA, Pan YD, Fang JY (2020) Increasing soil carbon stocks in eight permanent forest plots in China. Biogeosciences 17:715–726. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-715-2020
Zhu JJ, Zhu CY, Lu DL, Wang GG, Zheng X, Cao JS, Zhang JX (2021) Regeneration and succession: a 50-year gap dynamic in temperate secondary forests. Northeast China Forest Ecol Manag 484:118943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118943
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank all the scientists whose data and work were included in this meta-analysis.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-profit Research Institution of Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAFYBB2022SY010), and Pioneer and Leading Goose R&D Program of Zhejiang (2022C02053).
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-profit Research Institution of Chinese Academy of Forestry,CAFYBB2022SY010,Ran Tong,Pioneer and Leading Goose R and;D Program of Zhejiang, 2022C02053, Tonggui Wu
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R T and TG W designed the study, provided the funding and revised the manuscript; R T, BY J, and GG W performed the experiments, data collection, and drafted the manuscript; CY L, C M performed data processing and statistics; NF Z and WW Y performed part of the experiment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Handling editor: Andreas Bolte.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the topical collection on: Impacts of disturbances on carbon cycling in forest ecosystems.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tong, R., Ji, B., Wang, G.G. et al. Canopy gap impacts on soil organic carbon and nutrient dynamic: a meta-analysis. Annals of Forest Science 81, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-024-01224-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-024-01224-z